De Marchi, N., ed. 1988. The Popperian legacy in economics: Papers presented at a symposium in Amsterdam, December 1985.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (hereafter cited as PL; pp. 17-62 contain a discussion with the participants).
2.
Klamer, A., D. N. McCloskey, and R. M. Solow, eds. 1988. The consequences of economic rhetoric.New York: Cambridge University Press (hereafter cited as CER).
3.
McCloskey, D.N.1985. The rhetoric of economics.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press (hereafter cited as RE).
4.
McCloskey, D.N.1987. The writing of economics.New York/London: Macmillan (hereafter cited as W).
5.
Nelson, J. S., A. Megill, and D. N. McCloskey, eds. 1987. The rhetoric of the human sciences: Latiguage and argument in scholarship and public affairs.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press (hereafter cited as RHS).
6.
Bazerman, C.1987. Codifying the social scientific style: The APA Publication manual as a behaviorist rhetoric, in RHS , 125-44.
7.
Bicchieri, C.1988. Should a scientist abstain from metaphor? in CER, 100-14.
8.
Biesecker, B.A.1989. Rethinking the rhetorical situation from within the thematic of Différance.Philosophy and Rhetoric22:110-30.
9.
Black, M.1962. Metaphor. In Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy, by M. Black, 25-47. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
Boland, L.A.1989Review (of RHSJournal of Economic Literature27:73-74.
11.
Broekman, J.M.1982. Recht en antropologie [Law and anthropology ]Antwerpen: D. Reidel.
12.
Brown, R.H.1987. Reason as rhetorical: On relations among epistemology, discourse, and practice In RHS, 184-97.
13.
Bruns, G.L.1987. On the weakness of language in the human sciences In RHS, 239-62.
14.
Bunge, M.1982. Demarcating science from pseudoscienceFundamenta Scientiae3: 369-88.
15.
Caldwell, B.J.1988. The case for pluralism In PL , 231-44.
16.
Caldwell, B.J., and A.W. Coats1984. The rhetoric of economists: A comment on McCloskeyJournal of Ecotiomic Literature22:575-78.
17.
Campbell, J.A.1987. Charles Darwin: Rhetorician of science In RHS, 69-86.
18.
Carlston, D.E.1987. Turning psychology on itself: The rhetoric of psychology and the psychology of rhetoric In RHS , 145-62.
19.
Clower, R.W.1988The ideas of economists In CER, 85-89.
20.
Coats, A.W.1988. Economic rhetoric. The social and historical context In CER, 64-84.
21.
Davis, P.J., and R. Hersch1987Rhetoric and mathematics In RHS , 53-68.
22.
De Dijn, H.1988. Over de kloof tussen wetenschap en cultuur (en of ze moet of kan gedicht worden) [About the gap between science and culture (and whether it should or can be closed)]Onze Alma Mater42:299-309.
23.
— 1989. Religie en waarheidTijdschrift voor Filosofie51:407-26.
24.
Denton, F.T.1988The sigmticance of significance: Rhetorical aspects of statistical hypothesis testing in economics In RHS, 163-83.
25.
Derrida, J.1981a. PositionsChicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
—. 1981b. DisseminationChicago : University of Chicago Press.
27.
—. 1982a. Différance. In Margins of philosophy , by J. Derrida, 1-27. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
—. 1982b. White mythology: Metaphor in the text of philosophy. In Margins of philosophy, by J. Derrida, 207-71. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
29.
Dews, P.1986. The Nouvelle philosophie and Foucault. In Toward a critique of Foucault, edited by M. Gane, 61-105. London and New York: Routledge.
30.
Elshtain, J.B.1987. Feminist political rhetoric and women's studies In RHS, 319-40.
31.
Fish, S.1988. Comments from outside economics In CER , 21-30.
32.
Folbre, N., and H. Hartmann.1988. The rhetoric of self-interest: Ideology of gender in economic theory In CER, 184-203.
33.
Foucault, M.1980a. Truth and power. In Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, by M. Foucault, 109-33. New York:
34.
—. 1980b. What is an author? In Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews, by M. Foucault, 113-38. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
—. 1981. The order of discourse. In Untying the text: A Post-structuralist reader, edited by R. Young, 48-78. Boston, London, and Henley: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.
36.
Goodwin, C.D.1988. The heterogeneity of the economists' discourse: Philosopher, priest and hired gun In CER , 207-20.
37.
Habermas, J.1987. Excursus on leveling the genre distinction between philosophy and literature In The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures, by J. Habermas, 185-210. Cambridge.Cambridge University Press.
38.
Hausman, D.M.1980. How to do philosophy of economics In PSA 1980 (Proceedings of the 1980 Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association), vol. 1, edited by P. D. Asquith and R. N. Giere, 353-62. East Lansing, MI:
39.
Heilbronner, R.L.1988. Rhetoric and ideology In CER, 38-43.
40.
Hernadi, P.1987. Literary interpretation and the rhetoric of the human sciences In RHS, 263-75.
41.
Hiley, D.R.1985. Foucault and the question of enlightenmentPhilosophy and Social Criticism11.63-83.
42.
Hollis, M.1985. The emperor's newest clothesEconomics and Philosophy1:128-33.
43.
IJsseling, S.1976. Rhetoric and philosophy in conflict: A historical survey.The Hague.
44.
Klamer, A.1986. The self-portrait of a discipline: Economics through its textbooksMimeo. Wellesley College .
45.
—. 1987a The advent of modernism. Preliminary reportMimeo. University of Iowa.
46.
—. 1987b. Review (of REReview of Radical Political Economics19:80-83.
47.
—. 1987c. As if economists and their subjects were rational In RHS, 163-83.
48.
Klamer, A. , and D.N. McCloskey .1988a. Economics in the human conversation In CER, 3-20.
49.
—. 1988b. Negotiating a new conversation about economics In CER, 265-79.
50.
—. 1988c. Economics as discourse In PL, 259-78.
51.
Klemm, D.E.1987. The rhetoric of theological argument In RHS, 276-97.
52.
Landau, M.1987. Paradise lost: The theme of terrestriality in human evolution In RHS, 111-24.
53.
Laudan, L.1983. The demise of the demarcation problem. In Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis, edited by R. S. Cohen and L. Laudan, 111-27. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
54.
Leff, M.C.1987. Modern sophistic and the unity of rhetonc In RHS, 19-37.
55.
Maki, U.1988. How to combine rhetoric and realism in the methodology of economicsEconomics and Philosophy4.89-109.
56.
McCloskey, D.N.1983. The rhetoric of economicsJournal of Economic Literature21: 481-517.
57.
—. 1984a. The literary character of economicsDaedalus (Summer): 97-119.
58.
—. 1984b. Reply to Caldwell and CoatsJournal of Economic Literature22:579-80.
59.
—. 1985a. The loss function has been mislaid: The rhetoric of significance testsAmerican Economic Review75:201-5.
60.
—. 1985b. Sartorial epistemology in tatters: A reply to Martin HollisEconomics and Philosophy1:134-37.
61.
—. 1987. Reply (to reviews by Klamer, Stewart and GleicherReview of Radical Political Fconomics19.87-91.
62.
—. 1988a. Towards a rhetoric of economics. In The boundaries of economics, edited by G. C. Winston and R F. Teichgraber III, 13-29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
63.
—. 1988b. Thick and thin methodologies in the history of economic thought In PL, 245-57
64.
—. 1988c. Two replies and a dialogue on the rhetonc of economics: Maki, Rappaport, RosenbergEconomics and Philosophy4:150-66.
65.
—. 1988d. The consequences of rhetoric In CER , 280-93.
66.
McGee, M.C., and J.R. Lyne.1987. What are nice folks like you doing in a place like this? Some entailments of treating knowledge claims rhetorically In RHS, 381-406.
67.
Megill, A., and D.N. McCloskey.1987. The rhetoric of history In RHS, 221-38.
68.
Mirowski, P.1988Shall I compare thee to a Minkowski-Ricardo-Leonhef-Metzler matrix of the Mosak-Hicks type? Or, rhetoric, mathematics, and the nature of neoclassical economic theory In CER, 117-45.
69.
—. 1989. How not to do things with metaphors: Paul Samuelson and the science of neoclassical economicsStudies in History and Philosophy of Science20:175-91.
70.
Nelson, J.S.1987. Stories of science and politics: Some rhetorics of political research In RHS, 198-220.
71.
—. 1987. Seven rhetorics of inquiry: A provocation In RHS, 407-34.
72.
Nelson, J.S., A. Megill, and D.N. McCloskey.1987. Rhetoric of inquiry In RHS, 3-18.
73.
Oakeshott, M.1977. The voice of poetry in the conversation of mankind. In Rationalism in politics and other essays, by M. Oakeshott, 197-247. London and Totowa, NJ: Routledge.
74.
Papineau, D.1988. Does the sociology of science discredit science? In Relativism and realism in science, edited by R. Nola, 37-57. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer.
75.
Rappaport, S.1988. Economic methodology: Rhetoric or epistemologyEconomics and Philosophy4110-28.
76.
Resnick, S. and R. Wollf.1988. Marxian theory and the rhetorics of economics In CER, 47-63.
77.
Roelants, H.1971-72. Wetenschap en objektiviteit [Science and objectivity]Wijsgerig Perspectief op Maatschappij en Wetenschap12:202-28.
78.
—. 1984. Wetenschap, pseudowetenschap, parawentenschap [Science, pseudoscience, parascience]Mimeo.K. U. Leuven.
79.
Rorty, R.1982. Consequences of pragmatism (Essays: 1972-1980).Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
80.
—. 1987. Science as solidarity In RHS, 38-52.
81.
Rosaldo, R.1987. Where objectivity lies: The rhetoric of anthropology In RHS, 87-110.
82.
Rosenberg, A.1988. Economics is too important to be left to the rhetoriciansEconomics and Philosophy4:129-49.
83.
Shapiro, M.J.1987The rhetoric of social science: The political responsibilities of the scholar In RHS, 363-80.
84.
Solow, R.M.1988. Comments from inside economics In CER, 31-37.
85.
Visker, R.1988. Marshallian ethics and economics: Deconstructing the authority of sciencePhilosophy of the Social Sciences18:179-99.
86.
—. 1989. Can genealogy be critical? A somewhat unromantic look at Nietzsche and Foucault In Michel Foucault and the human sciences, by R. Visker. München: Boom.
87.
— . 1990. Michel Foucault and the human sciences.Munchen: Boom.
88.
Warsh, D.1988. "Yellow rain" and "supply-side economics": Some rhetoric that failed In CER, 247-62.
89.
White, J.B.1987. Rhetoric and law: The arts of cultural and communal life In RHS, 298-318.