This article argues against Jon Elster’s contention that there is a fundamental incompatibility between, on the one hand, autonomy and rationality, and, on the other hand, adaptation to the conditions of one’s existence in the sense that one’s desires or preferences are adjusted to what it is possible to achieve. It is claimed that Elster’s conclusions are premised on a defective conception of human faculties and powers, including a defective conception of human experience and rationality. Moreover, the claim is made that these defects are also characteristic of “rational choice theory” more generally.
Boudon, Raymond. 1979. La logique du social: Introduction à l’analyse sociologique. Paris: Hachette.
3.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
4.
Coleman, James S.1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
5.
Coleman, James S., and Thomas J. Fararo. 1992. Introduction. In Rational choice theory: Advocacy and critique, edited by James S. Coleman and Thomas J. Fararo, ix-xxii. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Elster, Jon. 1983. Sour grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Elster, Jon. 1984. Reprint. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in rationality and irrationality. Rev. ed.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Original edition, 1979.
8.
Elster, Jon. 1985. Making sense of Marx. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Elster, Jon. 1989a. The cement of society: A study of social order. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Elster, Jon. 1989b. Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Freud, Sigmund. 1984. Mourning and melancholia (1917). In On metapsychology: The theory of psychoanalysis, The Pelican Freud Library Volume 11, edited by Angela Richards, 245-268. New York: Penguin.
12.
Green, Donald P., and Ian Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies of rational choice: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Henderson, James M., and Richard E. Quandt. 1971. Reprint. Microeconomic theory: A mathematical approach, 2d ed.Tokyo: McGraw-Hill. Original edition, 1958.
14.
Nelson, Richard R., and Sidney G. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
15.
Sandven, Tore. 1995. Intentional action and pure causality: A critical discussion of some central conceptual distinctions in the work of Jon Elster. Philosophy of the Social Sciences25:286-317.
16.
Wolf, Susan. 1990. Freedom within reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
