This article compares estimates of “informed” public opinion derived from the regression-based approach of Bartels, Delli Carpini and Keeter, and Althaus with those from the deliberative polling method of Fishkin on the same sample of respondents. Contrary to low-information rationality perspectives, both methods indicate that across a range of prominent policy domains, level of political awareness has a strong impact on the expressed preferences of individuals. And while self-canceling across respondents tends to translate these individual-level influences into only rather modest effects in the aggregate, on a significant minority of issues, substantial shifts in collective opinion remain. The broad similarity of the estimates produced by these two very different methods, in addition to their convergence with previous studies of information effects, lends some simultaneous support to the validity and reliability of both approaches.
Alker, Hayward R.1969. “A Typology of Ecological Fallacies.” Pp. 69-86 in Quantitative Ecological Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mattei Dogan and Stein Rokkan. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Althaus, Scott L.1996. “Opinion Polls, Information Effects and Political Equality: Exploring Ideological Biases in Collective Opinion.” Political Communication13: 3-21.
3.
—. 1998. “Information Effects in Collective Preferences.” American Political Science Review92: 545-58.
4.
—. 2001. “Who’s Voted in When the People Turn Out?” Pp. 33-53 in Communication in U.S. Elections: New Agendas, edited by R.P. Hart and D. Shaw. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
Bartels, Larry. 1990. “Public Opinion and Political Interests.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 18-20.
6.
—. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science40(1): 194-230.
7.
—. 2000. “Panel Effects in the American National Election Studies.” Political Analysis8(1): 1-20.
8.
Bennett, Stephen E.1988. “‘Know-Nothings’ Revisited: The Meaning of Political Ignorance Today.” Social Science Quarterly17: 422-35.
9.
Brehm, John. 1993. The Phantom Respondents. Opinion Surveys and Political Representation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Converse, Phillip E.1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” Pp. 206-61 in Ideology and Discontent, edited by D. Apter. New York: Free Press.
11.
—. 1990. “Popular Representation and the Distribution of Information.” Pp. 369-88 in Information and Democratic Processes, edited by A. Ferejohn and J. Kuklinski. Urbana: University of Ilinois Press.
12.
Daves, Robert P.1996. “Debating the Deliberative Poll: The National Issues Convention.” Polling Report12(5): 7-8.
13.
Delli Carpini, Micheal X. and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Dempster, Arthur, Nan Laird, and Donald Rubin. 1977. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation From Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Methodological Series B39: 1-38.
15.
Denver, David, Gordon Hands, and Bill Jones. 1995. “Fishkin and the Deliberative Poll: Lessons From a Study of the Granada 500 Television Program.” Political Communication12: 147-56.
16.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
17.
Duch, Raymond, Harvey Palmer, and Christopher Anderson. 2000. “Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Performance.” American Journal of Political Science44: 635-52.
18.
Fishkin, James. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
—. 1988. “The Case for a National Caucus: Taking Democracy Seriously.” Atlantic MonthlyAugust: 16-18.
20.
—. 1995a. “Bringing Deliberation to Democracy: The British Experiment.” Good Society5(3): 45-49.
21.
—. 1995b. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
—. 1997. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. 2nd ed.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Fishkin, James and Robert Luskin. 1996. “The Deliberative Poll: A Reply to Our Critics.” Public Perspective7(1): 45-49.
24.
Gilens, Martin. 2001. “Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences.” American Political Science Review95: 379-96.
25.
Key, Vladimir O.1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936-1960. New York: Vintage.
26.
King, Gary, James Honaker, Anne Joseph, and Kenneth Scheve. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review95(1): 49-69.
27.
Kuklinski, James and Paul Quirk. 2000. “Reconsidering the Rational Public: Cognition, Heuristics, and Mass Opinion.” Pp. 153-83 in Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, edited by A. Lupia, M. McCubbins, and S. Popkin. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Ladd, Everett C.1996. “Fishkin’s Deliberative Poll Is Flawed Science and Dubious Democracy.” Public Perspective7(1): 41-45.
29.
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts Versus Encyclopaedias: Information and Voting Behaviour in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review88: 63-76.
30.
Lupia, Arthur, Matthew McCubbins, and Samuel Popkin. 2000. Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
McCombs, Maxwell E. and Amy Reynolds, eds. 1999. The Poll With a Human Face: The National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
Merkle, Daniel. 1996. “The National Issues Convention Deliberative Poll.” Public Opinion Quarterly60: 588-619.
33.
Mincer, Jacob. 1974. “Family Investment in Human Capital: Earnings of Women.” Journal of Political Economy82: 397-429.
34.
Mitofsky, Warren. 1996a. “The Emperor Has No Clothes.” Public Perspective7(1): 17-19.
35.
—. 1996b. “It’s Not Deliberative and It’s Not a Poll.” Public Perspective7(3): 4-6.
36.
Newport, Frank. 1996. “Why Do We Need a Deliberative Poll?” Public Perspective7(1): 7-9.
37.
Page, Benjamin and Robert Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in American’s Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Popkin, Samuel L.1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Price, Vincent and Peter Neijens. 1997. “Opinion Quality in Public Opinion Research.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research9: 336-60.
40.
—. 1998. “Deliberative Polls: Toward Improved Measures of ‘Informed’ Public Opinion?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research10: 145-76.
41.
Robinson, William S.1950. “Ecological Correlations and the Behaviour of Individuals.” American Sociological Review15: 351-57.
42.
Smith, Tom W.1984. “Nonattitudes: A Review and Evaluation.” Pp. 215-55 in Surveying Subjective Phenomena, edited by C. Turner and E. Martin. New York: Academic Press.
43.
Sniderman, Paul, Richard Brody, and Paul Tetlock. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Sturgis, Patrick. 2001. “Political Attitudes: The Role of Information as a Determinant of Direction, Structure and Stability.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of London.
45.
Tindale, R. Scott. 1996. “Groups Are Unpredictably Transformed by Their Internal Dynamics.” Public Perspective7(1): 16-18.
46.
Tringali, Brian. 1996. “Experimenting With Artificial Democracy.” Public Perspective7(1): 19-20.
47.
Zaller, John R.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
