In this paper, we propose a method for constructing an occupation-based socioeconomic index that can easily incorporate changes in occupational structure. The resulting index is the occupational percentile rank for a given cohort, based on contemporaneous information pertaining to educational composition and the number of workers at the occupation level. An occupation may experience an increase or decrease in its occupational rank due to changes in relative sizes and educational compositions across occupations. The method is flexible in dealing with changes in occupational and educational measurements over time. Applying the method to U.S. history from the mid-nineteenth century to the present day, we derive the index using IPUMS U.S. Census microdata from 1850 to 2000 and the American Community Surveys (ACSs) from 2001 to 2018. Compared to previous occupational measures, this new measure takes into account occupational status evolvement caused by long-term secular changes in occupational size and educational composition. The resulting percentile rank measure can be easily merged with social surveys and administrative data that include occupational measures based on the U.S. Census occupation codes and crosswalks.
AndersonW. A. 1927. “The Occupational Attitudes and Choices of a Group of College Men. Part I.” Social Forces6:278‐83.
2.
AndersonW. A. 1928. “The Occupational Attitudes and Choice of a Group of College Men. Part II.” Social Forces6:467‐73.
3.
AndersonW. A. 1934. “The Occupational Attitudes of College Men.” The Journal of Social Psychology5:435‐66.
4.
AutorDavid. 2019. “Work of the Past, Work of the Future.” National Bureau of Economic Research working paper.
5.
BlauPeter M.DuncanOtis Dudley. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.
6.
BlishenBernard R. 1958. “The Construction and Use of An Occupational Class Scale.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science24:519‐31.
7.
BlishenBernard R.CarrollWilliam K.1978. “Sex Differences in a Socioeconomic Index for Occupations in Canada.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology15:352‐71.
8.
BlishenBernard R.McRobertsHugh A.1976. “A Revised Socioeconomic Index for Occupations in Canada.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology13:71‐9.
9.
BoseChristine E.RossiPeter H.. 1983. “Gender and Jobs: Prestige Standings of Occupations As Affected by Gender.” American Sociological Review48:316‐30.
10.
BoydMonica. 1986. “Socioeconomic Indicies and Sexual Inequality: A Tale of Scales.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology23:457‐80.
11.
BravermanHarry. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
12.
BuchmannClaudiaDiPreteThomas A.McDanielAnne. 2008. “Gender Inequalities in Education.” Annual Review of Sociology34:319‐37.
13.
CainPamelaTreimanDonald J.. 1981. “The Dictionary of Occupational Titles As a Source of Occupational Data.” American Sociological Review46:253‐78.
14.
CaplowTheodore. 1954. The Sociology of Work. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
CattellRaymond B. 1942. “The Concept of Social Status.” The Journal of Social Psychology15:293‐308.
16.
ClarkRobert E. 1948. “The Relationship of Schizophrenia to Occupational Income and Prestige.” American Sociological Review3:325‐30.
17.
COLLABU.S. Department of Labor. 1949. Dictionary of Occupational Titles Volume 1. 2nd ed. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18.
ConkMargo A. 1978. “Occupational Classification in the United States: 1870–1940.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History9:111‐30.
19.
CoutuWalter. 1936. “The Relative Prestige of Twenty Professions As Judged by Three Groups of Professional Students.” Social Forces14:522‐9.
20.
DaviesA. F. 1952. “Prestige of Occupations.” British Journal of Sociology3:134‐47.
21.
DavisJerome. 1927. “Testing the Social Attitudes of Children in the Government Schools in Russia.” American Journal of Sociology32:947‐52.
22.
DavisKingsleyMooreWilbert E.1945. “Some Principles of Stratification.” American Sociological Review10:242‐9.
23.
DavisJames A.SmithTom W.1991. General Social Surveys, 1972–1990: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
24.
DuncanOtis Dudley. 1961. “A Socioeconomic Index for All Occupations’ and ‘Properties and Characteristics of the Socioeconomic Index’.” Pp. 109-138 and 139-161 in Occupations and Social Status, edited by Jr. Albert J. Reiss. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
25.
DuncanOtis Dudley. 1968. “Social Stratification and Mobility: Problems in the Measurement of Trend.” Pp. 675-719 in Indicators of Social Change, edited by Eleanor B. Sheldon and Wilbert E. Moore. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
26.
DuncanOtis Dudley. 1984. Notes on Social Measurement: Historical and Critical. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
EdwardsAlba M. 1917. “Social-Economic Groups of the United States.” American Statistical Association Quarterly15:643‐61.
28.
EdwardsAlba M. 1933. “A Social-Economic Grouping of the Gainful Workers of the United States.” Journal of the American Statistical Association28:377‐87.
29.
EdwardsAlba M. 1938. A Social-Economic Grouping of the Gainful Workers of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30.
EmighRebecca JeanRileyDylanAhmedPatricia. 2016. Changes in Censuses From Imperialist to Welfare States: How Societies and States Count. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
EriksonRobertGoldthorpeJohn H.PortocareroLucienne. 1979. “Intergenerational Class Mobility in Three Western European Societies: England, France and Sweden.” The British Journal of Sociology30:415‐41.
32.
FeathermanDavid L.HauserRobert M.. 1976. “Prestige Or Socioeconomic Scales in the Study of Occupational Achievement.” Sociological Methods and Research4:403‐22.
33.
FeathermanDavid L.HauserRobert M.. 1978. Opportunity and Change. New York, NY: Academic Press.
34.
FeathermanDavid L.SobelMichaelDickensDavid. 1975. “A Manual for Coding Occupations and Industries into Detailed 1970 Categories and a Listing of 1970-basis Duncan Socioeconomic Scores.” Technical report, Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin, Center for Demography and Ecology Working Paper, 75–1. (This material is reproduced in Robert M. Hauser and David L. Featherman (eds.), The Process of Stratification, New York, Academic Press, 1977.).
35.
FoxJohn. 2016. Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
36.
FoxJohnSuschniggCarole. 1989. “A Note on Gender and the Prestige of Occupations.” Canadian Journal of Sociology14:353‐60.
37.
GanzeboomHarry B. G.De GraafPaul M.TreimanDonald J.. 1992. “A Standard International Socio-Economic Index of Occupational Status.” Social Science Research21:1‐56.
38.
GanzeboomHarry B. G.TreimanDonald J.. 1996. “Internationally Comparable Measures of Occupational Status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations.” Social Science Research25:201‐39.
39.
GanzeboomHarry B. GTreimanDonald J.. 2003. “Three Internationally Standardized Measures for Comparative Research on Occupational Status.” Pp. 159-193. in Advances in Cross-Cultural Harmonisation. A European Working Book for Demographic and Socio-Economic Variables, edited by Christof Wolf and Jurgen H.P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik. London: Kluwer Academic Press.
40.
GlassDavid V (ed.). 1954. Social Mobility in Britain. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
41.
GoldbergerArthur S. 1989. “Economic and Mechanical Models of Intergenerational Transmission.” The American Economic Review79:504‐13.
42.
GoldthorpeJohn H.HopeKeith. 1974. The Social Grading of Occupations. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
43.
GrossEdward. 1959. “The Occupational Variable As a Research Category.” American Sociological Review24:640‐9.
44.
HallJohnJonesCaradog B.. 1950. “Social Grading of Occupations.” British Journal of Sociology1:31‐55.
45.
HallerArchibald O.LewisDavid M.. 1966. “The Hypothesis of Intersocietal Similarity in Occupational Prestige Hierarchies.” American Journal of Sociology72:210‐6.
46.
HandelMichael J. 2016. “The O*NET Content Model: Strengths and Limitations.” Journal for Labour Market Research49:157‐76.
47.
HattPaul K. 1950. “Occupations and Social Stratification.” American Journal of Sociology55:533‐43.
48.
HaugMarie R. 1977. “Measurement in Social Stratification.” Annual Review of Sociology3:51‐77.
49.
HauserRobert M. 1980. “Some Exploratory Methods for Modeling Mobility Tables and Other Cross-Classified Data.” Sociological Methodology11:413‐58.
50.
HauserRobert M. 1982. “Occupational Status in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History15:111‐26.
51.
HauserRobert M.FeathermanDavid L.. 1977. The Process of Stratification: Trends and Analyses. New York: Academic Press.
52.
HauserRobert M.WarrenJohn Robert. 1997. “Socioeconomic Indexes for Occupations: A Review, Update, and Critique.” Sociological Methodology27:177‐298.
53.
HauserRobert M.WarrenJohn RobertHuangMin-HsiungCarterWendy Y.. 2000. “Occupational Status, Education, and Social Mobility in the Meritocracy.” Pp. 179–229 in Meritocracy and Economic Inequality, edited by Arrow K., S. Bowles, and S. Durlauf. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
HodgeRobert W. 1961. Occupational Composition and Status Crystallization. Master’s thesis, University of Chicago.
55.
HodgeRobert W. 1981. “The Measurement of Occupational Status.” Social Science Research10:396‐415.
56.
HodgeRobert W.SiegelPaul M.RossiPeter H.. 1964. “Occupational Prestige in the United States, 1925–63.” American Journal of Sociology70:286‐302.
57.
HodgeRobert W.TreimanDonald J.RossiPeter H.. 1966. “A Comparative Study of Occupational Prestige.” Pp. 309-321 in Pp, edited by R. Bendix and S. Lipset. New York, NY: Free Press.
58.
HollingsheadAugust B. 1949. Elmtown’s Youth. New York: John Wiley.
59.
HollingsheadAugust B. 1957. “Two Factor Index of Social Position.” in New Haven. CT: Privately Printed.
60.
HollingsheadAugust B. 1975. “Four Factor Index of Social Status.” Unpublished working paper, Department of Sociology, Yale University.
61.
HollingsheadAugust B.RedlichF. C.. 1958. Social Class and Mental Illness. New York: John Wiley.
62.
HoutMichaelDiPreteThomas A.. 2006. “What We Have Learned: RC28’s Contributions to Knowledge About Social Stratification.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility24:1‐20.
63.
HoutMichaelSmithTom W.MarsdenPeter V.. 2015. “Prestige and Socioeconomic Scores for the 2010 Census Codes.” in GSS Methodological Report, No. 124. Chicago: NORC.
64.
HuntWilliam C. 1897. “Workers At Gainful Occupations At the Federal Censuses of 1870, 1880, and 1890.” Bulletin of the Department of Labor, No11:393‐433.
65.
InkelesAlexRossiPeter H.. 1956. “National Comparisons of Occupational Prestige.” American Journal of Sociology61:329‐39.
66.
JarvisBenjamin F.SongXi. 2017. “Rising Intragenerational Occupational Mobility in the United States, 1969 to 2011.” American Sociological Review82:568‐99.
67.
JencksChristopherPermanLauriRainwaterLee. 1988. “What Is a Good Job? A New Measure of Labor-Market Success.” American Journal of Sociology93:1322‐57.
68.
JonssonJan O.GruskyDavid B.Di CarloMatthewPollakReinhardBrintonMary C.. 2009. “Microclass Mobility: Social Reproduction in Four Countries.” American Journal of Sociology114:977‐1036.
69.
KahlJoseph A. 1957. The American Class Structure. New York: Rinehart & Co.
70.
KrausVeredSchildErling O.HodgeRobert W.. 1978. “Occupational Prestige in the Collective Conscience.” Social Forces56:900‐18.
71.
LehmanHarvey C.WittyPaul A.. 1931. “Further Study of the Social Status of Occupations.” The Journal of Educational Sociology5:101‐12.
72.
LipsetSeymour M.BendixReinhard. 1959. Social Mobility in Industrial Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
73.
NakaoKeikoTreasJudith. 1994. “Updating Occupational Prestige and Socioeconomic Scores: How the New Measures Measure Up.” Sociological Methodology1:1‐72.
74.
NamCharles B.BoydMonica. 2004. “Occupational Status in 2000: Over a Century of Census-Based Measurement.” Population Research and Policy Review23:327‐58.
75.
NamCharles B.PowersMary G.. 1968. “Changes in the Relative Status Level of Workers in the United States, 1950–1960.” Social Forces47:158‐70.
76.
NamCharles B.PowersMary G.. 1983. The Socioeconomic Approach to Status Measurement (With a Guide to Occupational and Socioeconomic Status Scores). Houston: Cap and Gown Press.
77.
National Center for O* NET Development. 2000. Transitioning O* NET to the Standard Occupational Classification. Raleigh, North Carolina: National Center for O* NET Development (https://www.onetcenter.org/reports/TRreport˙xwk.html).
78.
NorthCecilHattPaul K.. 1947. “Jobs and Occupations: A Popular Evaluation.” Opinion News9:3‐13.
79.
OsgoodC. E.StagnerR., 1941. “Analysis of a Prestige Frame of Reference by a Gradient Technique.” Journal of Applied Psychology25:275‐90.
80.
PowersMary G. 1982. “Measures of Socioeconomic Status: An Introduction.” Pp. 1-28 in Measures of Socioeconomic Status: Current Issues, edited by M. G. Powers, Boulder, CO: Westview Press for the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
81.
Reiss Jr.Albert J (ed.). 1961. Occupations and Social Status. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
82.
RossiterW. S. 1909. A Century of Population Growth: From the First Census of the United States to the Twelfth 1790–1900. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
83.
RugglesSteven. 2014. “Big Microdata for Population Research.” Demography51:287‐97.
84.
SiegelPaul S. 1971. Prestige in the American Occupational Structure. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Chicago. March 1971.
85.
SmithMapheus. 1943. “An Empirical Scale of Prestige Status of Occupations.” American Sociological Review8:185‐92.
86.
SmithTom W.SonJaesok. 2014. “Measuring Occupational Prestige on the 2012 General Social Survey.” in GSS Methodological Report, No. 122. NORC.
87.
SongXiCampbellCameron D.. 2017. “Genealogical Microdata and Their Significance for Social Science.” Annual Review of Sociology43:75‐99.
88.
SongXiMasseyCatherine G.RolfKaren A.FerrieJoseph P.RothbaumJonathan L.XieYu. 2020. “Long-Term Decline in Intergenerational Mobility in the United States Since the 1850s.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117:251‐8.
89.
SorokinPitrim A. 1959[1927]. Social and Cultural Mobility. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
90.
StevensGillianChoJoo Hyun. 1985. “Socioeconomic Indexes and the New 1980 Census Occupational Classification Scheme.” Social Science Research14:142‐68.
91.
StevensGillianFeathermanDavid L.1981. “A Revised Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status.” Social Science Research10:364‐95.
92.
StevensGillianHoisingtonElizabeth. 1987. “Occupational Prestige and the 1980 U.S. Labor Force.” Social Science Research16:74‐105.
93.
SvalastogaKaare. 1959. Prestige, Class, and Mobility. London, UK: Heinemann.
94.
TreasJudithTyreeAndrea. 1979. “Prestige Versus Socioeconomic Status in the Attainment Processes of American Men and Women.” Social Science Research8:201‐21.
95.
TreimanDonald J. 1975. “Problems of Concept and Measurement in the Comparative Study of Occupational Mobility.” Social Science Research4:183‐230.
96.
TreimanDonald J. 1976. “A Standard Occupational Prestige Scale for Use with Historical Data.” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History7:283‐304.
97.
TreimanDonald J. 1977. Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
98.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1910. Thirteenth Census of the United States: Classified Index to Occupations. Population Division. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
99.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1915. Index to Occupations: Alphabetical and Classified. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
100.
U.S. Department of Labor. 1965. Dictionary of Occupational Titles Volume I. 3rd ed. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
101.
U.S. Department of Labor. 1977. Dictionary of Occupational Titles. 4th ed. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
102.
U.S. Department of Labor. 1991. Dictionary of Occupational Titles Volume 1. 4th Edition, Revised. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
103.
U.S. Department of Labor. 1998. O*NET 98: Data Dictionary. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
104.
U.S. Department of Labor. 1939a. Dictionary of Occupational Titles Part I. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
105.
U.S. Department of Labor. 1939b. Dictionary of Occupational Titles, Part II: Group Arrangement of Occupational Titles and Codes. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
106.
van LeeuwenMarco H. D.MaasIneke. 2011. HISCLASS: A Historical International Social Class Scheme. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
107.
van LeeuwenMarco H. D.MaasInekeMilesAndrew. 2002. HISCO: Historical International Standard Classification of Occupations. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
108.
WallaceMichaelKallebergArne L.. 1982. ““Industrial Transformation and the Decline of Craft: The Decomposition of Skill in the Printing Industry 1931–1978.” American Sociological Review47:307‐24.
109.
WardZachary. forthcoming. “Intergenerational Mobility in American History: Accounting for Race and Measurement Error.” American Economic Reviewhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w29256.
110.
WarnerW. LloydMeekerMarchiaKennethEells. 1949. Social Class in America: A Manual of Procedure for the Measurement of Social Status. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
111.
WarrenJohn RobertSheridanJennifer T.HauserRobert M.. 1998. “Choosing a Measure of Occupational Standing: How Useful Are Composite Measures in Analyses of Gender Inequality in Occupational Attainment?” Sociological Methods and Research27:3‐76.
112.
WeedenKim A.GruskyDavid B.. 2005. “The Case for a New Class Map.” American Journal of Sociology111:141‐212.
113.
WeedenKim A.GruskyDavid B.. 2012. “The Three Worlds of Inequality.” American Journal of Sociology117:1723‐85.
114.
WegenerBernd. 1992. “Concepts and Measurement of Prestige.” Annual Review of Sociology18:253‐80.
115.
WelchM. K. 1950. “The Ranking of Occupations on the Basis of Social Status.” Occupations; the vocational guidance journal27:237‐41.
116.
WrightErik Olin. 1997. Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
117.
XieYu. 2007. “Otis Dudley Duncan’s Legacy: The Demographic Approach to Quantitative Reasoning in Social Science.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility25:141‐56.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
