Abstract
For many years, tuberculosis (TB) has been endemic in Pakistan; many rare and unusual presentations have been reported. There is a myriad of non-specific symptoms which always requires a high index of clinical suspicion for TB. World Health Organization data suggest that Pakistan ranks as the fifth highest country burdened with TB and has the fourth highest prevalence of multi-drug resistant TB globally. With an annual incidence of 277 cases per 100,000, the importance of early diagnosis and treatment is self-evident. We present a case where a strong suspicion of isolated hepatosplenic TB in an immunocompetent patient justified a directed approach.
Case report
A 32-year-old man presented to the Civil Hospital, Karachi, with complaints of low grade fever and unintentional weight loss of 8 kg over the previous four months. His fever was reported to be intermittent and was associated with generalized weakness. His appetite had also decreased. He denied a productive cough, chest pain, abdominal pain, night sweats and was otherwise asymptomatic. His past medical and family history were insignificant. He was not addicted to drugs nor to alcohol and had never smoked.
On examination, severe cachexia was noted. There was no anaemia, jaundice, palpable lymphadenopathy, clubbing or oedema. On abdominal examination, an enlarged, firm spleen palpable 2 cm below the costal margin was palpated, the remaining examination being unremarkable. Initial laboratory screening revealed a haemoglobin level of 130 g/L, a total leucocyte count of 10.3 × 10 9/L with a differential of 70% polymorphs, 22% lymphocytes, and 2% eosinophils and a platelet count of 346 × 10 9/L. The C-reactive protein (CRP) level was raised at 75.6 mg/L but electrolyte levels, liver and renal function tests were all within normal limits. A blood culture showed no growth.
Further tests for malaria, infectious mononucleosis, hepatitis B and C, brucellosis and HIV were all negative. The chest radiograph was unremarkable. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed hypodense lesions in the liver and an enlarged spleen of 13.7 cm in size. Computed tomography (CT) abdominal scan confirmed multiple lesions (9–17 cm in size) throughout the liver, a uniformly enlarged spleen and small subcentimetric mesenteric lymph nodes. The coagulation profile was normal. After full counselling concerning the risks and advantages, an ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of the hepatic lesions revealed the presence of chronic lymphoplasmacytic inflammation with caseous necrosis consistent with the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) (Figure 1). Acid fast bacilli (AFB) smear test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Quantiferon-TB test were all, however, negative. After appropriate counselling regarding the diagnosis and treatment options available, a trial of anti-tuberculous therapy was initiated, resulting in recovery after six months of treatment without adverse reactions. At the 15-months follow-up, he had gained > 4 kg in weight and an ultrasound scan of the liver and spleen showed a reversion to normal. He felt generally better and reported no fever nor weakness.
Histological examination of sections from liver biopsy (at 10 × magnification) showed degeneration of hepatocytes along with necrotic tissue debris, extensive caseation necrosis and multiple epitheloid granulomas containing Langerhans giant cells. Moderate lymphocytic infiltration was present.
Discussion
TB is currently increasing in severity owing to the increasing prevalence of AIDS and the development of multi-drug resistant strains. The rising global burden of this disease has accounted for an increase in unusual case presentations of TB. 1
Our case, initially presenting with non-specific complaints, led initially towards a diagnosis of chronic malaria or primary liver disease. Although TB is of extremely high prevalence in Pakistan, the denial of any cough, productive sputum or night sweats did not suggest TB in the first instance. However, such non-specific symptoms are the chief presenting symptoms described of all hepatosplenic TB patients. 2
The abdominal ultrasound scan confirmed physical findings but did not confirm any specific diagnosis. Thus, an abdominal CT scan was ordered but there was a waiting time of two weeks before this could be done. Abdominal exploration was ruled out by the cachectic condition of the patient, and so an ultrasound-guided biopsy was decided upon, as previously described.2,3 While a CT-guided biopsy has greater accuracy, and thus less risk of complication, the delay entailed by repeating this scan could not be envisaged. Although a splenic biopsy has a higher diagnostic yield, 4 it is riskier than a liver biopsy, which is more frequently performed in our institution.
Despite the absence of AFB, the considered opinion was that TB was nonetheless most likely, as in the similar described. 2 Hepatosplenic TB is a curable disease with relatively good outcomes, but delay in treatment may be fatal. Where a hard and fast diagnosis cannot be reached, it is entirely reasonable to accept the most likely choice.
Conclusion
Though a trial of TB treatment is frowned upon in some circles, where the diagnosis of TB is correct beyond reasonable doubt, treatment must be started without further delay, especially in a cachectic patient.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
