This article explores the problematic issue of using editions as sources for studies of English historical morpho-syntax. It presents a methodological case study of the variation between he and it in reference to inanimate objects (such as mercury) in Mirror of Lights, an alchemical text that survives in multiple copies from the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. The study reveals that the manuscript versions differ greatly in how they employ he and it, underscoring that linguistic studies based on one version would provide very different results from those using another version as the source. The article argues that it is crucial that such manuscript variation is taken into consideration in morpho-syntactic studies. It suggests that an electronic edition that incorporates all copies of the text would make the full variation available to linguists, while a traditional critical edition would highlight the pattern of one version but obscure or ignore the patterns of other manuscripts. The article also discusses the more general problem of including a multiversion text such as the Mirror of Lights into a corpus and suggests some possible solutions.
Bailey, Richard W.2004. The need for good texts: The case of Henry Machyn's Day Book, 1550–1563. In Studies in the history of the English language II: Unfolding conversations, ed. Anne Curzan and Kimberly Emmons, 217–228. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2.
Bailey, Richard W., Marilyn Miller, and Colette Moore, eds. Forthcoming. A London provisioner's chronicle, 1550–1563, by Henry Machyn. Ann Arbor: Scholarly Publishing Office, the University of Michigan Library.
3.
Benson, Larry D., ed. 1987. The Riverside Chaucer.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
4.
Crisciani, Chiara. 1996. Alchemy and medicine in the Middle Ages. Bulletin de philosophie médiévale38:9–21.
5.
Curzan, Anne. 2000. Gender categories in early English grammars: Their message to the modern grammarian. In Gender in grammar and cognition, vol. 2,Manifestations of gender, ed. Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen, and Mirja Saari, 561–576. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
6.
Curzan, Anne. 2003. Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Curzan, Anne, and Chris C. Palmer. 2006. The importance of historical corpora, reliability, and reading. In Corpus-based studies of diachronic English, ed. Roberta Facchinetti and Matti Rissanen, 17–34. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
8.
Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter. 1975. The foundations of Newton's alchemy, or “The Hunting of the Greene Lyon.”Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Fellows, Jennifer. 1998. Author, author, author...:An apology for parallel texts. In A guide to editing Middle English, ed. Vincent P. McCarren and Douglas Moffat, 15–24. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Fredriksson, Maria, ed. 2002. Esculapius'De stomacho, Edited with an Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Ph.D. diss., Uppsala University, Sweden.
11.
Geoghegan, D.1957. A licence of Henry VI to practise alchemy. Ambix6:10–17.
12.
Greetham, D. C.1992. Textual scholarship: An introduction. New York: Garland.
13.
Grund, Peter. 2002. In search of gold: Towards a text edition of an alchemical treatise. In Middle English from tongue to text, ed. Peter J. Lucas and Angela M. Lucas, 265–279. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
14.
Grund, Peter. 2003. The golden formulas: Genre conventions of alchemical recipes in the Middle English period. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen104 (4): 455–475.
15.
Grund, Peter. 2004a. Albertus Magnus and the Queen of the Elves: A 15th-century English verse dialogue on alchemy. Anglia122 (4): 640–662.
16.
Grund, Peter, ed. 2004b. “Misticall Wordes and Names Infinite”: An Edition of Humfrey Lock's Treatise on Alchemy, with an Introduction, Explanatory Notes and Glossary. Ph.D. diss., Uppsala University, Sweden.
17.
Grund, Peter. 2006. “ffor to make Azure as Albert biddes”: Medieval English alchemical writings in the pseudo-Albertan tradition. Ambix53 (1): 21–42.
18.
Grund, Peter, Merja Kytö, and Matti Rissanen. 2004. Editing the Salem witchcraft records: An exploration of a linguistic treasury. American Speech79 (2): 146–166.
19.
Keiser, George R.1998. A manual of the writings in Middle English 1050–1500. Vol. 10,Works of science and information. New Haven: Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences.
20.
Kibre, Pearl. 1980. Albertus Magnus on alchemy. In Albertus Magnus and the sciences: Commemorative essays 1980, ed. James A.Weisheipl, 187–202. Toronto, Canada: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
21.
Kytö, Merja, and Terry Walker. 2003. The linguistic study of Early Modern English speech-related texts: How “bad” can “bad” data be?Journal of English Linguistics31 (3): 221–248.
22.
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 1, Internal factors. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
23.
Laing, Margaret. 2002. Corpus-provoked questions about negation in early Middle English. Language Sciences24:297–321.
24.
Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 2,1066–1476, ed. Norman Blake, 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Lass, Roger. 2004a. Texts as linguistic objects. In Categorization in the history of English, ed. Christian J. Kay and Jeremy J. Smith, 147–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26.
Lass, Roger. 2004b. Ut Custodiant Litteras: Editions, corpora and witnesshood. In Methods and data in English historical dialectology, ed. Marina Dossena and Roger Lass, 21–48. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
27.
Machan, Tim William. 1994. Textual criticism and Middle English texts. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
28.
Mausch, Hanna. 1986. A note on LME gender. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia18:89–100.
29.
McCarren, Vincent P., and Douglas Moffat, eds. 1998. A guide to editing Middle English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
30.
McIntosh, Angus, M. L. Samuels, and Michael Benskin. 1986. A linguistic atlas of Late Mediaeval English. 4 vols. Aberdeen, UK: Aberdeen University Press.
31.
Minnis, A. J., and Charlotte Brewer, eds. 1992. Crux and controversy in Middle English textual criticism. Cambridge, UK: D. S. Brewer.
32.
Moffat, Douglas. 1998. A bibliographical essay on editing methods and authorial and scribal intention. In A guide to editing Middle English, ed. Vincent P. McCarren and Douglas Moffat, 25–57. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
33.
Nevalainen, Terttu, and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 1994. Its strength and the beauty of it: The standardization of the third person neuter possessive in Early Modern English. In Towards a Standard English 1600–1800, ed. Dieter Stein and Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, 171–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
34.
Norri, Juhani. 1992. Names of sicknesses in English, 1400–1550: An exploration of the lexical field. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae: Dissertationes Humanarum Litterarum 63. Helsinki, Finland: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.
35.
Ogden, Margaret S., Charles E. Palmer, and Richard L. McKelvey. 1954. Bibliography. In Middle English dictionary. Plan and bibliography, ed. Hans Kurath and Sherman M. Kuhn. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36.
Pahta, Päivi, ed. 1998. Medieval embryology in the vernacular: The case ofDe spermate. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki LIII. Helsinki, Finland: Société Néophilologique.
37.
Principe, Lawrence M.1998. The aspiring adept: Robert Boyle and his alchemical quest. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
Roberts, Gareth. 1994. The mirror of alchemy: Alchemical ideas and images in manuscripts and books from antiquity to the seventeenth century. London: The British Library.
39.
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2000. Scientific language and spelling standardisation 1375–1550. In The development of Standard English 1300–1800, ed. Laura Wright, 131–154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Päivi Pahta, eds. 2004. Medical and scientific writing in Late Medieval English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Taavitsainen, Irma, Päivi Pahta, and Martti Mäkinen. 2005. Middle English medical texts (CD-ROM). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42.
Tavormina, Teresa M.2005. The Twenty-Jordan series: An illustrated Middle English uroscopy text. American Notes and Queries18 (3): 40–64.
43.
Voigts, Linda Ehrsam. 2004. The Declaracions of Richard of Wallingford: A case study of a Middle English astrological treatise. In Medical and scientific writing in Late Medieval English,ed. Irma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta, 197–208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Voigts, Linda Ehrsam, and Patricia Deery Kurtz. 2000. Scientific and medical writings in Old and Middle English: An electronic reference (CD-ROM). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
