This article provides a general background to this special focus section of the journal on ‘racial interaction and isolation in everyday life’. It reviews both the geographic literature on segregation and the psychological literature on the contact hypothesis, and calls for more research on how, when and why racial isolation manifests at a micro-ecological level; that is, the level at which individuals actually encounter one another in situations of bodily co-presence. Some conceptual and methodological implications of this extension of the segregation literature are described. The social psychological significance of the racial organisation of such ordinary activities as eating in cafeterias, relaxing on beaches and occupying public seating are also explored. The focus of the argument is that everyday boundary processes may maintain the salience of racial categories, embody racial attitudes and regulate the possibility of intimate contact.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice.Reading: Addison-Wesley Blackwell.
2.
BrewerM. (1997). The social psychology of intergroup relations: Can research inform practice?Journal of Social Issues, 53, 197–211.
3.
CampbellD. T.KruskalW. H.WallaceW. P. (1966). Seating aggregation as an index of attitude. Sociometry, 29, 1–15.
4.
ChristopherA. J. (1994). The atlas of apartheid.London: Routledge.
5.
ConnollyP. (2000). What now for the contact hypothesis?Race, Ethnicity and Education, 3, 170–193.
6.
DavisM.SeibertR.BreedW. (1966). Interracial seating patterns on New Orleans public transit. Social Problems, 13, 298–306.
7.
DixonJ. A. (2001). Contact and boundaries: ‘Locating’ the social psychology of intergroup relations. Theory and Psychology, 11, 587–608.
8.
DixonJ. A.ReicherS. (1997). Intergroup contact and desegregation in the ‘new’ South Africa. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 361–381.
9.
DixonJ. A.DurrheimK. (2003). Contact and the ecology of racial division: Some varieties of informal segregation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 1–23.
10.
DovidioJ.GaetnerS.KawamakiK. (2003). Intergroup contact: The past, present and the future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 5–20.
11.
EllenI. G. (1998). Stable racial integration in the contemporary United States: An empirical overview. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20, 27–42.
12.
FestingerL.SchachterS.BackK. (1959). Social pressures in informal groups.London: Tavistock.
13.
FosterD. H. (1997). Space, place and race. Journal of Community and Health Sciences, 4, 1–10.
14.
FosterD. H. (2000). Race, space and civil society. In CochraneJ. R.KleinB. (Eds), Sameness and difference: Problems and potentials in South African civil society (pp. 57–78). The Cultural heritage and Contemporary Change Series.
15.
FosterD. H.FinchilescuG. (1986). Contact in a non-contact society. In HewstoneM.BrownR. (Eds), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 119–136). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
16.
GoldbergD. T. (1993). Polluting the body politic: Racist discourse and urban location. In CrossM.KeithM. (Eds), Racism, the city and the state (pp. 185–205). London: Routledge.
17.
GoldbergT. (1998). The new segregation. Race and Society, 1, 15–32.
18.
GordonS. (Ed.) (1985). A talent for tomorrow. Life stories of South African servants.Johannesburg: Ravan Press.
19.
HallE. T. (1966). The hidden dimension.London: The Bodley Head.
20.
HutchensR. (2001). Numeric measures of segregation: Desirable properties and their implications. Mathematical Social Sciences, 42, 13–29.
21.
KaplanP. F.FugateD. (1972). Pilot study of racial interaction in a public place: Northern and Southern settings compared. International Journal of Group Tensions, 2, 63–79.
22.
KirschenbaumA. (1984). Segregated integration: A research note on the fallacy of misplaced numbers. Social Forces, 62, 784–793.
23.
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space.Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
MaozI. (2002). Is there contact at all? Intergroup interaction in planned contact interventions between Jews and Arabs in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, 185–197.
25.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67, 281–315.
26.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1989). Hypersegregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: Black and Hispanic segregation along five dimensions. Demography, 26, 373–393.
27.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass.Cambridge: Howard University Press.
28.
MasseyD. S.FischerM. J. (2000). How segregation concentrates poverty. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23, 670–691.
29.
MasseyD. S.WhiteM. J.PhuaV. (1996). The dimensions of segregation revisited. Sociological Methods and Research, 25, 172–206.
30.
McCauleyC.PlummerM.MoskalenkoS.MordkoffJ. B. (2001). The exposure index: A measure of intergroup contact. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 7, 321–336.
31.
MynhardtJ. C.du ToitA. (1991). Contact and change. In FosterD.Louw-PotgieterJ. (Eds), Social Psychology in South Africa (pp. 271–314). Johannesburg: Lexicon.
32.
ParkerJ. H. (1968). The interaction of Negroes and whites in an integrated church setting. Social Forces, 46, 359–366.
33.
PaulusP. B.NagarD. (1987). Environmental influences on social interaction and group development. In HendrickC. (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 9) (pp. 68–90). CA: Newbury, Sage.
34.
PettigrewT. F. (1969). Racially separate or together?Journal of Social Issues, 25, 43–69.
35.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
36.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice?. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 93–114). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
PredA. (1984). Place as historically contingent process - structuration and the time-geography of becoming places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74, 279–297.
38.
RobinsonJ. (1998). Spaces of democracy: Remapping the apartheid city. Environment and Planning D, 16, 533–548.
39.
SchellingT. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior.New York: Norton.
40.
SchnellI.YoavB. (2001). The sociospatial isolation of agents in everyday life spaces as an aspect of segregation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91, 622–636.
41.
SchofieldJ. W.SagarH. A. (1977). Peer interaction patterns in an integrated middle school. Sociometry, 40, 130–138.
42.
SchofieldJ. W. (1986). Black-white contact in desegregated schools. In HewstoneM.BrownR. (Eds), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 79–92). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
43.
SibleyD. (1995). Geographies of exclusion: Society and difference in the West.London: Routledge.
44.
SigelmanL.BledsoeT.WelchS.CombsM. W. (1996). Making contact? Black-white social interaction in the urban setting. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1306–1332.
45.
TaylorD. M.MoghaddamF. M. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives (2nd edition). London: Praeger.
