The construct validation of the Relationship Harmony and Soft-Heartedness Scales of the South African Personality Inventory

Abstract

This study forms part of the South African Personality Inventory project that aims to develop: (a) an indigenous theoretical model of personality; and (b) a unique personality measure that is in line with South African legislation and that can be used fairly to assess personality across different South African language and cultural groups. In line with this mandate, the objectives in this study were twofold: first, to validate the Relationship Harmony and Soft-Heartedness Scales of the South African Personality Inventory and to determine whether these constructs are unique and distinct from the Big Five personality factors, and second, to determine whether Relationship Harmony and Soft-Heartedness are predictive of an external criterion, prosocial behaviour. A quantitative, cross-sectional research design with convenience sampling was used. Data were gathered from students (N = 431) at two tertiary institutions in South Africa, using preliminary Relationship Harmony and Soft-Heartedness Scales, the Basic Traits Inventory (Short form: Research Version), and the Prosocialness Scale. Results indicated that the Relationship Harmony and Soft-Heartedness Scales yielded five and six reliable factors, respectively, and presented good content, convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity, adding substantial predictive value for prosocial behaviour over and above the Big Five Model.

Keywords

Five-Factor Model personality assessment prosocial behaviour Relationship Harmony Soft-Heartedness South African Personality Inventory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrahams

(2002). The (un)fair usage of the 16PF (SA92) in South Africa: A response to C.H. Prinsloo and I. Ebersöhn. South African Journal of Psychology, 32, 58–61.

Bandalos

D. L.

Finney

S. J.

(2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In Marcoulides

G. A.

Schumacker

R. E.

(Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: New developments and techniques (pp. 269–296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Benet

Waller

N. G.

(1995). The big seven factor model of personality description: Evidence for its cross-cultural generality in a Spanish sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 701–718.

Caprara

G. V.

Alessandri

Di Giunta

Panerai

Eisenberg

(2010). The contribution of agreeableness and self-efficacy beliefs to prosociality. European Journal of Personality, 24, 35–55.

Caprara

G. V.

Steca

Zelli

Capanna

(2005). A new scale for measuring adults’ prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 77–89.

Cheung

F. M.

Kwong

J. Y. Y.

Zhang

(2003). Clinical validation of the Chinese personality assessment inventory. Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 89–100.

Cheung

F. M.

Van de Vijver

F. J. R.

Leong

F. T. L.

(2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66, 593–603.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cohen

(1992). Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

10.

Eysenck

H. J.

Eysenck

S. B. G.

(1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (adult and junior). London, UK: Hodder & Stoughton.

11.

Hau

Marsh

H. W.

(2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modeling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychology, 57, 327–351.

12.

Heuchert

Parker

Stumpf

Myburgh

(2000). The five-factor model of personality in South African college students. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 112–125.

13.

John

O. P.

Srivastava

(1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin

L. A.

John

O. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102 –138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

14.

Kahn

J. H.

(2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and application. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 684–718.

15.

Lee

Ashton

M. C.

(2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.

16.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.

17.

Meiring

Van de Vijver

F. J. R.

Rothmann

(2006). Bias in an adapted version of the 15FQ+ in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 36, 340–356.

18.

Moyo

Theron

(2011). A preliminary factor analytic investigation into the first-order factor structure of the Fifteen Factor Questionnaire Plus (15FQ+) on a sample of Black South African managers. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology [SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde], 37, Article #934, 22 pp. doi: 10.4102/sajip.v37i1.934

19.

Nel

J. A.

(2008). Uncovering personality dimensions in eleven different language groups in South Africa: An exploratory study (Unpublished doctoral thesis). North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

20.

Nel

J. A.

Valchev

V. H.

Rothmann

Van de Vijver

F. J. R.

Meiring

De Bruin

G. P.

(2012). Exploring the personality structure in the 11 languages of South Africa. Journal of Personality, 80, 915–948.

21.

Netemeyer

R. G.

Bearden

W. O.

Sharma

(2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

22.

Taylor

(2004). The construction of a South African Five Factor Personality Questionnaire (Unpublished masters dissertation). Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg, South Africa.

23.

Taylor

De Bruin

G. P.

(2005). Basic Traits Inventory: Technical manual. Johannesburg, South Africa: Jopie van Rooyen and Partners.

24.

Valchev

V. H.

Van de Vijver

F. J. R.

Nel

J. A.

Rothmann

Meiring

De Bruin

G. P.

(2011). Implicit personality conceptions of the Nguni cultural-linguistic groups of South Africa. Cross-Cultural Research, 45, 235–266.

25.

Van Eeden

R. G. P.

Mantsha

T. R

. (2007). Theoretical and methodological considerations in the translation of the 16PF5 into an African language. South African Journal of Psychology, 37, 62–81.

26.

Wallis

Birt

(2003). A comparison of native and non-native English-speaking groups’ understanding of the vocabulary contained within the 16PF (SA92). South African Journal of Psychology, 33, 182–190.

27.

Wolfaardt

J. B.

Roodt

(2005). Basic concepts. In Foxcroft

C. D.

Roodt

(Eds.), An introduction to psychological assessment in the South African context (2nd ed., pp. 24–45). Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press.