Community conversations as community engagement: hosts’ reflections

Abstract

This article reviews community conversations as a community engagement tool within the South African context by exploring the perceptions of the conversation hosts. A focus group discussion was held with community conversation hosts to better understand the community conversation process and its community engagement value. Their reflections are reviewed against four principles of community engagement, namely, appreciation, applicability, provocation, and collaboration. According to the hosts, the community conversations seemingly increased community members’ awareness of community resources and allowed for community members to voice their shared concerns and discuss matters that they deem to be most relevant in their community. The conversations were considered to have created a participative environment in which community members and external stakeholders could discuss potential solutions to identified problems, thereby laying a foundation for future action. Additionally, the conversations were interpreted as promotive of relationship-building and collaboration opportunities among community members and between community members and external stakeholders. The article reflects on limitations of the method and recommendations for its future application.

Keywords

Appreciative inquiry community conversation community engagement hosts South Africa World Café

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldred

(2009). From community participation to organizational therapy? World Café and appreciative inquiry as research methods. Community Development Journal, 46, 57–71.

Boyd

N. M.

Bright

D. S.

(2007). Appreciative inquiry as a mode of action research for community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 1019–1036.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

Brown

Isaacs

(2005). The World Café: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Campbell

Jovchelovitch

(2000). Health, community and development: Towards a social psychology of participation. Journal of Community & Applied Psychology, 10, 255–270.

Campbell

Murray

(2004). Community health psychology: Promoting analysis and action for social change. Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 187–195.

Carr

D. S.

Halvorsen

(2001). An evaluation of three democratic, community-based approaches to citizen participation: Surveys, conversations with community groups, and community dinners. Society & Natural Resources, 14, 107–126.

Carson

(2011). Designing a public conversation using the World Café method. Social Alternatives, 30(1), 10–14.

Carter

E. W.

Swedeen

Walter

M. C. M.

Moss

C. K.

(2012). ‘I don’t have to do this by myself?’ Parent-led community conversations to promote inclusion. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(1), 9–23.

10.

Cooperrider

D. L.

Srivastva

(1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1, 139–169.

11.

DeTurk

(2006). The power of dialogue: Consequences of intergroup dialogue and their implications for agency and alliance building. Communication Quarterly, 54, 33–51.

12.

Eksteen

Bulbulia

van Niekerk

Ismail

Lekoba

(2012). Ukuphepha: A multi-level community engagement model for the promotion of safety, peace and health. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 22, 501–510.

13.

Fullarton

Palermo

(2008). Evaluation of a large group method in an educational institution: The World Café versus large group facilitation. Journal of Institutional Research, 14(1), 109–117.

14.

Hechenbleikner

Gilburg

Dunnell

(2008). Reading’s World Café: Increasing community engagement in planning for the future. Public Management. 90, 6–12.

15.

Helling

Thomas

J. C.

(2007). Encouraging community dialog: Approach, promise, and tensions. International Journal of Public Administration, 24, 749–770.

16.

Hornett

(2007). World Café: Stimulating seminar dialogues in a large class. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 34, 256–258.

17.

Israel

B. A.

Schulz

A. J.

Parker

E. A.

Becker

A. B.

(1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173–202.

18.

Kanaskie

M. L.

(2011). Incorporating café design principles into end-of-life discussions: An innovative method for continuing education. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 42, 166–171.

19.

Kretzmann

McKnight

J. P.

(1996). Building community from the inside out. Chicago, IL: ACTA Publications.

20.

Moulton

P. L.

Miller

M. E.

Offutt

S. M.

Gibbens

B. P.

(2007). Identifying rural health care needs using community conversations. Journal of Rural Health, 23(1), 92–96.

21.

Neal

J. W.

Neal

Z. P.

(2011). Power as a structural phenomenon. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 157–167.

22.

Prewitt

(2011). Working in the café: Lessons in group dialogue. The Learning Organization, 18, 189–202.

23.

Prilleltensky

(2013). Wellness without fairness: The missing link in psychology. South African Journal of Psychology, 43, 147–155.

24.

Roberts

(1997). Public deliberation: An alternative approach to crafting policy and setting direction. Public Administration Review, 57, 124–132.

25.

Seligman

M. E. P.

Csikszentmihalyi

(2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.

26.

Tan

Brown

(2005). The World Café in Singapore: Creating a learning culture through dialogue. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41, 83–90.

27.

Watts

R. J.

Flanagan

(2007). Pushing the envelope on youth civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 779–792.

28.

Willig

(2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.