The impact of home language on the understanding of the vocabulary used in the South African version of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire Fifth Edition

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the understanding of the vocabulary used in the South African version of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire Fifth Edition by native English speakers and non-native English speakers. Two prominent studies investigated the impact of home language when using the earlier version, namely, the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire South African 1992 version. Methodological suggestions following from these studies were implemented in this study and the results for the current version were compared to the findings of the earlier studies. The sample comprised 213 first-year university students from different faculties. Understanding of the vocabulary used was operationalised as the ability to provide synonyms for words used in the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire Fifth Edition. The number of correct responses to each word was reported in frequency tables for each language group and Chi-square analyses provided support for these findings. The average percentage of correct responses was calculated to allow for comparisons. The native English-speaking group performed moderately better. The non-native English-speaking respondents nevertheless performed notably higher in this study when compared to earlier studies. This was attributed partly to the changes in the design of this study. Further comparison between the language groups in this study was done using an independent samples t-test. The mean score obtained by each language group was relatively high, but a significant difference between the groups suggested greater difficulty in understanding in the case of non-native English speakers. These findings were further informed by a preliminary investigation into the level of understanding of different population groups.

Keywords

Assessment cross-cultural cross-linguistic language personality Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire Fifth Edition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrahams

(1996). The cross-cultural comparability of the 16PF (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.

Abrahams

Mauer

K. F.

(1999a). The comparability of the constructs of the 16PF in the South African context. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 25, 53–59.

Abrahams

Mauer

K. F.

(1999b). Qualitative and statistical impacts of home language on responses to the items of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 29, 76–86.

Anastasi

Urbina

(1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Conn

S. R.

Rieke

M. L.

(1998). The 16PF Fifth Edition technical manual (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

De Bruin

G. P.

Schepers

J. M.

Taylor

. (2005, June). Construct validity of the 16 PF 5th Edition and the Basic Traits Inventory. Paper presented at the 8th Annual Industrial Psychology Conference, Pretoria, South Africa.

Foxcroft

C. D.

(2011). Ethical issues related to psychological testing in Africa: What I have learned (so far). Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2). Retrieved from https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.9707/2307-0919.1022

Foxcroft

C. D.

Roodt

Abrahams

(2013). Psychological assessment: A brief retrospective overview. In Foxcroft

Roodt

(Eds.), Introduction to psychological assessment in the South African context (4th ed., pp. 9–27). Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press.

Grieve

(2001). Factors affecting assessment results. In Foxcroft

Roodt

(Eds.), An introduction to psychological assessment in the South African context (pp. 315–343). Cape Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press.

10.

Heaven

P. C. L.

Pretorius

(1998). Personality structure among black and white South Africans. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 664–667.

11.

Institute for Personality and Ability Testing (IPAT). (2009). 16PF South African version: User’s Manual (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Author.

12.

Laher

Cockcroft

(2013). Current and future trends in psychological assessment in South Africa. In Laher

Cockcroft

(Eds.), Psychological assessment in South Africa: Research and applications (pp. 547–553). Johannesburg, South Africa: Wits University Press.

13.

Lievens

Van Keer

Harris

M. M.

Bisqueret

(2003). Predicting cross-cultural training performance: The validity of personality, cognitive ability and dimensions measured by an assessment centre and behaviour description interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 476–489.

14.

Maree

D. J. F.

(2002). Properties of and South African norms for the 16PF fifth edition: Technical report. Johannesburg, South Africa: Jopie van Rooyen & Partners SA (Pty) Ltd.

15.

McDonald

(2011). Comparing a native English-speaking group and non-native English-speaking group’s understanding of the vocabulary used in the 16PF5 (Unpublished master’s dissertation). University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.

16.

Meiring

Van de Vijver

A. J. R.

Rothmann

Barrick

M. R.

(2005). Construct, item and method bias of cognitive and personality tests in South Africa. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31(1), 1–8.

17.

Meiring

Van de Vijver

F. J. R.

Rothmann

(2006). Bias in the adapted version of the 15FQ+ in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 36, 340–356.

18.

Nell

(1994). Interpretation and miss-interpretation of the South African Wechsler-Bellevue Adult Intelligence Scale: A history and a prospectus. South African Journal of Psychology, 24, 100–109.

19.

Nell

(1997). Science and politics meet at last: The insurance industry and neuropsychological norms. South African Journal of Psychology, 27, 43–49.

20.

Nell

(1999). Standardising the WAIS-III and the WMS-III for South Africa: Legislative psychometric and policy issues. South African Journal of Psychology, 29, 128–138.

21.

Price

(2011). Human resource management (4th ed.). Hampshire, UK: South-Western Cengage Learning.

22.

Prinsloo

C. H.

(1992). Handleiding vir die gebruik van die Sestien-Persooonlikheidsfaktorvraelys, Suid-Afrikaanse 1992-weergawe (16PF, SA92) /Manual for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire South African 1992 version (16PF, SA92). Pretoria, South Africa: Raad vir Geesteswetenskaplike Navorsing.

23.

Prinsloo

C. H.

(1998). The factor structure and readability of the South African English version of the Fifth Edition of the American 16PF (Report to the External Advisory Committee). Pretoria, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.

24.

Prinsloo

C. H.

Ebersöhn

(2002). Fair usage of the 16PF in personality assessment in South Africa: A response to Abrahams and Mauer with special reference to issues of research methodology. South African Journal of Psychology, 32(3), 48–57.

25.

Schepers

J. M.

Hassett

C. F.

(2006). The relationship between the fourth edition (2003) of the Locus of Control Inventory and the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (Version 5). South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 32(2), 9–18.

26.

Schoeman

De Beer

Visser

(2008). The relationship between learning potential, English language proficiency and work-related training test results. South African Journal of Labour Relations, 32(1), 47–62.

27.

Shaughnessy

J. J.

Zechmeister

E. B.

Zechmeister

J. S.

(2003). Research methods in psychology (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

28.

Shuttleworth-Jordan

A. B.

(1996). On not reinventing the wheel: A clinical perspective on culturally relevant test usage in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 26, 96–102.

29.

Van Eeden

Mantsha

T. R.

(2007). Theoretical and methodological considerations in the translation of the 16PF5 into an African language. South African Journal of Psychology, 37, 62–81.

30.

Van Eeden

Prinsloo

C. H.

(1997). Using the South African version of the 16PF in a multicultural context. South African Journal of Psychology, 27, 151–169.

31.

Van Eeden

Taylor

Prinsloo

C. H.

(2013). The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) in South Africa. In Laher

Cockcroft

(Eds.), Psychological assessment in South Africa: Research and applications (pp. 203–217). Johannesburg, South Africa: Wits University Press.

32.

Van Eeden

Taylor

T. R.

Du Toit

(1996). Adaptation and standardization of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire Fifth Edition (16PF5) in South Africa: A feasibility study. Pretoria, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.

33.

Wallis

Birt

(2003). A comparison of native and non-native English-speaking groups’ understanding of the vocabulary contained within the 16PF (SA92). South African Journal of Psychology, 33, 182–190.