A review of international and local research on projective personality testing across cultures is given. It is concluded that thematic apperception tests have been used more frequently, and the possible reasons for this are discussed. Features common to the adaptations of various projective techniques for cross-cultural use are pointed out, and discussed in terms of a distinction between the more traditional ‘tests of inclusion’ and the more recent ‘tests of selection’ that are useful in cross-cultural testing contexts. The conclusion is drawn that this reconceptualization elucidates a centrally important aspect of testing across cultures, namely, the transmission of meanings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndorL.E. (1983). Psychological and sociological studies of the Black people of Africa, South of the Sahara 1960–1975 — an annotated select bibliography. Johannesburg: National Institute for Personnel Research.
2.
BaranS. (1970). A study of the relation between the dimension of field-dependence and degree of acculturation with special reference to the Zulu. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Johannesburg, University of the Witwatersrand.
3.
BaranS. (1972). Projective Personality Test/Projektiewe Persoonlikheidstoets. Johannesburg, National Institute for Personnel Research.
4.
BaranS. (1975). The development and validation of a projective test for use among Bantu-speaking people. In MorseS.J.OrpenC. (Eds.), Contemporary South Africa: Social psychological perspectivesJuta: Cape Town.
5.
BeckS.J. (1937). Introduction to the Rorschach method — Monograph 1. New York: American Orthopsychiatric Association.
6.
BerryJ.W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4, 119–128.
7.
BhanaK. (1987). Psychological research with Indian South Africans: Explorations in method. In MauerK.F.RetiefA.I. (Eds.), Psychology in context: Cross-cultural research trends in South Africa. Pretoria, Human Sciences Research Council.
8.
BleulerM.BleulerR. (1935). Rorschach's ink-blot test and racial psychology: Mental peculiarities of Moroccans. Character and Personality, 4, 97–114.
ButcherJ.M.PancheriP. (1976). A handbook of cross-national MMPI research. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
CattellR.B. (1951). Principles of design in ‘projective’ or misperception tests of personality. In AndersonH.H.AndersonG.L. (Eds.), An introduction to projective techniques. New York, Prentice-Hall Inc.
12.
ColeM.ScribnerS. (1974). Culture and thought. New York: Wiley.
13.
DasenP.R. (1984). The cross-cultural study of intelligence: Piaget and the Baoulé. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 407–434.
14.
De RidderJ.C. (1956). An investigation into educational and occupational differences in test performance on a battery of adaptability tests designed for Africans. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Johannesburg, University of the Witwatersrand.
15.
De RidderJ.C. (1961). The personality of the urban African in South Africa. New York: Humanities Press.
16.
DurojaiyeM.O.A. (1971). Is the concept of African intelligence meaningful?East Africa Journal, 8, 4–12.
17.
EpsteinS. (1966). Some considerations on the nature of ambiguity and the use of stimulus dimensions in projective techniques. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 30, 192–193.
18.
ErasmusP.F. (1975a). A survey of the literature on Bantu personality with particular reference to TAT and depth perception investigations. Institute for Psychometric Research Report No. P-10, Pretoria, Human Sciences Research Council.
19.
ErasmusP.F. (1975b). TAT-Z Catalogue No. 1676. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
20.
GeertzC. (1971). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
21.
GergenK.J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266–275.
22.
GladwinT.SarasonS.B. (1953). Truk: Man in paradise. New York: Wennergren.
23.
HenryW.E. (1947). The thematic apperception technique in the study of culture-personality relations. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 35, 3–138.
24.
HenryW.E. (1956). The analysis of fantasy: The Thematic Apperception Technique in the study of personality. New York: Wiley.
25.
HoltzmanW.H. (1968). Cross-cultural studies in psychology. International Journal of Psychology, 3, 83–91.
26.
HoltzmanW.H. (1980). Projective techniques. In TriandisH.C.BerryJ.W. (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology Vol. 2. Methodology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
27.
JacksonD.N.GuthrieG.M.AstillaE.ElwoodB. (1983). The cross-cultural generalizability of personality construct measures. In IrvineS.H.BerryJ.W. (Eds.), Human Assessment and cultural factors. New York: Plenum Press.
28.
LeeS.G. (1953). Manual of a thematic apperception test for African subjects: Set of 22 pictures. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.
29.
Lepot-FromentC. (1974). Comments on sexual and anatomic responses in the Rorschach test. Review of Psychology, Science and Education, 9, 445–456.
30.
LessaW.A.SpigelmanM. (1954). Ulithian personality as seen through ethnological materials and thematic test analysis. Los Angeles, University of California Press.
31.
LindzeyG. (1961). Projective techniques and cross-cultural research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
32.
MalgadyR.G.CostantinoG.RoglerL.H. (1984). Development of a Thematic Apperception Test (TEMAS) for urban Hispanic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 986–996.
33.
MauerK.F.RetiefA.I. (1985). Metodologiese probleme in die sielkunde/Methodological problems in psychology. Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Wysbegeerte, 4, 19–24.
34.
McClellandD.C.AtkinsonJ.W.ClarkR.A.LowellE.L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Irvington.
35.
MinnaarG.G.GerickeJ.S. (1979). The classification and analysis of TAT-Z responses IPER Report 1389 PBP. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
36.
MischelW. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
37.
MurrayH.A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York, Oxford.
38.
MurrayH.A. (1943). Thematic apperception test: Set of 31 pictures and manual. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
39.
OkonjiM.O. (1975). African approaches to the study of behaviour. In BerryJ.W.LonnerW.J. (Eds.), Applied cross-cultural psychology. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger297–302.
40.
PoortingaY.H. (1983). Some comments on the use and fairness of tests in developing countries. Paper presented at the Third Regional Asian Conference of the International Association for Cross-cultural Psychology, Bangi Selangor, Malaysia.
41.
RetiefA. (1986). The need for theory development in psychology: Some case studies. South African Journal of Psychology, 16, 71–78.
42.
RetiefA. (in press). In defence of realism in psychology. In BothaE.JoubertD.MoutonJ.RetiefA.. Social theorizing and social reality. HSRC Research Methodology Series. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
43.
RetiefA.I.BosmanP. (in press). A projective personality test suitable for limited cross-cultural use. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
44.
RorschachH. (1942). Psychodiagnostics. Berne: Verlag Hans Huber.
45.
SechrestL. (1986). Modes and methods of personality research. Journal of Personality, 54, 318–331.
46.
SherwoodE.T. (1957). On the designing of TAT pictures, with special reference to a set for an African people assimilating western culture. The Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 161–190.
47.
SherwoodE.T. (1961). Swazi personality and the assimilation of Western culture. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Chicago.
48.
SobelH.J. (1981). Projective methods of cognitive analysis. In MerluzziT.GlassC.GenestM. (Eds.), Cognitive assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
49.
SpenceB.A. (1982). A psychological investigation into the characteristics of black guidance teachers. M.A. Dissertation, Pretoria, University of South Africa.
50.
StonesC.R. (1985). Qualitative research: A viable psychological alternative. The psychological record, 35, 63–75.
51.
SwartD.J. (1982). Manual for the Picture Personality Test for Indian South Africans (PPT-ISA). Institute for Psychological and Edumetric Research Report No. 2054, Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
52.
WhiteD.H. (1982). The effects of job stress in the South African mining industry. Unpublished PH.D. Thesis, Pretoria, University of South Africa.
