A Comparative Analysis of Job Motivation and Career Preference of Asian Undergraduate Students

Abstract

This article examines how various job motivators and perception toward public service affect university students’ tendencies to choose public sector jobs in a comparative context. We address this question using survey data collected from undergraduate students in China, Singapore, and Korea. The findings indicate that a positive association exists between motivation to benefit society and public sector job preference among Singaporean and Korean students, although such a relationship does not exist among Chinese students. Job security and salary are commonly important motivators for students who prefer either public or private sector jobs. Finally, the divergent characteristics of students’ career goals serve to emphasize the importance of comparative studies in identifying context-specific and context-general factors that motivate students toward public service careers.

Keywords

job motivation public sector careers comparative study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aberbach

J. D.

(1991). Public service and administrative reform in the United States: The Volcker Commission and the Bush Administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 57, 403-419.

Baldwin

J. N.

(1990). Perceptions of public versus private sector personnel and informal red tape: Their impact on motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 20, 7-28.

Bellante

Link

A. N.

(1981). Are public-sector workers more risk averse than private sector workers. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 34, 408-412.

Bellows

(2009). Meritocracy and the Singapore Political System. Asian Journal of Political Science, 17, 24-44.

Benest

(2005). It’s a reality: The shrinking talent pool for local government managers. Public Management, 87(2), 14-19.

Bilmes

Gould

W. S.

(2009). The people factor: Strengthening America by investing in public service. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Brewer

G. A.

Selden

S. C.

(1998). Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(3), 413-440.

Broadnax

W. D.

(2012). America needs its best in the public’s service. Public Administration Review, 72, 13-14.

Chetkovich

(2003). What’s in a sector? The shifting career plans of public policy students. Public Administration Review, 63, 660-674.

10.

Christensen

R. K.

Wright

B. E.

(2011). The effects of public service motivation on job choice decisions: Disentangling the contributions of person-organization fit and person-job fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 723-743.

11.

Crewson

P. E.

(1997). Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 499-518.

12.

DeHart-Davis

Marlowe

Pandey

S. K.

(2006). Gender Dimensions of Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 873-887.

13.

Delfgaauw

Dur

(2010). Managerial talent, motivation, and self-selection into public management. Journal of Public Economics, 84, 654-660.

14.

Frank

S. A.

Lewis

G. B.

(2004). Government employees. The American Review of Public Administration, 34, 36-51.

15.

Frederickson

H. G.

(2002). Confucius and the moral basis of bureaucracy. Administration & Society, 33, 610-628.

16.

Gabris

G. T.

Simo

(1995). Public sector motivation as an independent variable affecting career decisions. Public Personnel Management, 24, 33-51.

17.

Giauque

Ritz

Varone

Anderfuhren-Biget

Waldner

(2011). Putting public service motivation into context: a balance between universalism and particularism. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 227-253.

18.

Y. C.

Kang

(2011). Creating a capable bureaucracy with loyalists: The internal dynamics of the South Korean developmental state, 1948-1979. Comparative Political Studies, 44, 78-108.

19.

Herzberg

(1966). Work and nature of man. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

20.

Herzberg

Mausner

Snyderman

B. B.

(1959). The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley.

21.

Houston

D. J.

(2000). Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 713-728.

22.

Hwang

K. K.

(1996). South Korea’s bureaucracy and the informal politics of economic development. Asian Survey, 36, 306-319.

23.

Jurkiewicz

C. L.

Massey

T. K.

Brown

R. G.

(1998). Motivation in public and private organizations: A comparative study. Public Productivity & Management Review, 21, 230-250.

24.

Karl

K. A.

Peat

(2004). A match made in heaven or a square peg in a round hole? How public service educators can help students assess person-environment fit. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10, 265-277.

25.

Karl

K. A.

Sutton

C. L.

(1998). Job values in today’s workforce: A comparison of public and private sector employees. Public Personnel Management, 27, 515-527.

26.

Khojasteh

(1993). Motivating the private vs. public sector managers. Public Personnel Management, 22, 391-401.

27.

Kim

Vandenabeele

(2010). A strategy for building public service motivation research internationally. Public Administration Review, 70, 701-709.

28.

Lee

Choi

D. L.

(in press). Does public service motivation influence the intention to work in the public sector? Evidence from Korea. Review of Public Personnel Administration.

29.

Lee

(2010, October 17). Increase of competition rate of civil service exam. Yonhap News. Retrieved from http://media.daum.net/politics/view.html?cateid=1018&newsid=20101017130503854&p=yonhap

30.

Leighley

J. E.

Vedlitz

(1999). Race, ethnicity, and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations. Journal of Politics, 61, 1092-1114.

31.

Lewis

G. B.

Frank

S. A.

(2002). Who wants to work for the government. Public Administration Review, 62, 395-404.

32.

Light

P. C.

(1999). The new public service. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

33.

Light

P. C.

(2000). The empty government talent pool: The new public service arrives. The Brookings Review, 18, 20-23.

34.

Light

P. C.

(2002). The troubled state of the federal public service. Washington, DC: Center for Public Service, Brookings Institution.

35.

Liu

(2009). Evidence of public service motivation of social workers in China. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 349-366.

36.

Liu

Hui

Yang

(2011). How well can public service motivation connect with occupational intention? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77, 191-211.

37.

Liu

(2013). Public Administration in China—Evolution and Current Challenge, Asian Journal of Political Science, 21, 1-20.

38.

Lucas

R.E.

(1993). Making a miracle. Econometrica 61, 251–272.

39.

Lyons

S. T.

Duxbury

L. E.

Higgins

C. A.

(2006). A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 605-618.

40.

Naff

K. C.

Crum

(1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 5-16.

41.

E. S. W.

Gossett

C. W.

(2013). Career Choice in Canadian public service: An exploration of fit with the millennial generation. Public Personnel Management, 42, 337-358.

42.

Perry

J. L.

(1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6, 5-22.

43.

Perry

J. L.

Hondeghem

(2008). Motivation in public management: The call of public service. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

44.

Perry

J. L.

Wise

L. R.

(1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public administration review, 50, 367-373.

45.

Quah

J. S. T.

(2010). Public administration Singapore-style. Bingley, UK: Emerald.

46.

Rainey

H. G.

(1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. The American Review of Public Administration, 16, 288-302.

47.

Rainey

H. G.

Steinbauer

(1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 1-32.

48.

Rampell

(2011, March 1). More college graduates take public service jobs. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/02/business/02graduates.html

49.

Rose

R. P.

(2013). Preferences for careers in public work: Examining the government-nonprofit divide among undergraduates through public service motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 43, 416-437.

50.

Schneider

(1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.

51.

Schuster

J. R.

(1974). Management-compensation policy and the public interest. Public Personnel Management, 3, 510-523.

52.

Shaobin

(2010, December 5). Chinese sit public servant exam, facing intense competition. Xinhua News. Retrieved from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-12/05/c_13635994.htm

53.

Stivers

(1993). Gender images in public administration: legitimacy and the administrative state. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

54.

Tan

K. P.

(2008). Meritocracy and elitism in a global city: Ideological shifts in Singapore. International Political Science Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29, 7-27.

55.

Taylor

(2005). Recruiting university graduates for the public sector: An Australian case study. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18, 514-533.

56.

Taylor

(2008). Graduates’ views on working in the public sector: A comparative analysis of the three tiers of government. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67, 20-29.

57.

Tsao

K. K.

Worthley

J. A.

(2009). Civil service development in China and America: A comparative perspective. Public Administration Review, 69, S88-S94.

58.

Vandenabeele

(2008). Government calling: Public service motivation as an element in selecting government as an employer of choice. Public Administration, 86, 1089-1105.

59.

Vandenabeele

Hondeghem

Steen

(2004). The civil service as an employer of choice in Belgium: How work orientations influence the attractiveness of public employment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 24, 319-333.

60.

Vandenabeele

Scheepers

Hondeghem

(2006). Public service motivation in an international comparative perspective: The UK and Germany. Public Policy and Administration, 21, 13-31.

61.

Vandenabeele

Van de Walle

(2008). International differences in public service motivation: Comparing regions across the world. In Perry

J. L.

Hondeghem

(Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 223-244). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

62.

Wittmer

(1991). Serving the people or serving for pay: Reward preferences among government, hybrid sector, and business managers. Public Productivity and Management Review, 14, 369-383.

63.

World Bank. (1993). The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

64.

World Bank. (2009). The governance indicator. Retrieved from http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home