Work-to-Life Spillover and Organizational Commitment: The Moderating Role of Flextime and Sectoral Differences Between Public and Non-Public Organizations
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2025
Work-to-Life Spillover and Organizational Commitment: The Moderating Role of Flextime and Sectoral Differences Between Public and Non-Public Organizations
The importance of retaining and motivating employees from a human resources management perspective has intensified the focus on organizational commitment and work-life balance. Despite extensive research on factors influencing organizational commitment, empirical evidence remains inconclusive, particularly regarding perceived work-life spillover and flexibility. In the Asian context, female workers often bear a greater share of caregiving responsibilities, yet studies specifically targeting female workers remain limited. This study addresses these gaps by examining the impact of work-to-life spillover on organizational commitment and the moderating effect of workplace flexibility (flextime) among Korean women managers. In addition, sectoral differences were analyzed using data from the 2016 and 2018 Korean Women Manager Panel (KWMP) compiled by the Korean Women’s Development Institute (KWDI). The findings revealed that both negative and positive spillover significantly influence organizational commitment. Moreover, the actual use of flextime was found to mitigate the negative effects of spillover on organizational commitment. From a human resource management (HRM) perspective, these results underscore the importance of not only providing workplace flexibility systems but also ensuring their effective use. In addition, the findings emphasize the need for institutional support tailored to sector-specific contexts to address work-life spillover challenges effectively.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990). Organizational socialization tactics: A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers’ commitment and role orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 847–858.
2.
AntunesF.PereiraL. F.DiasÁ. L.da SilvaR. V. (2023). Flexible labour policies as competitive advantage. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(4), 563–590.
3.
AryeeS.SrinivasE. S.TanH. H. (2005). Rhythms of life: Antecedents and outcomes of work-family balance in employed parents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 132.
4.
AshforthB. E.KreinerG. E.FugateM. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491.
5.
AzeemS. M.AkhtarN. (2014). The influence of work life balance and job satisfaction on organizational commitment of healthcare employees. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 4(2), 18.
6.
BaeK. B.KimD. (2016). The impact of decoupling of telework on job satisfaction in US federal agencies: Does gender matter?The American Review of Public Administration, 46(3), 356–371.
7.
BalP. M.De LangeA. H. (2015). From flexibility human resource management to employee engagement and perceived job performance across the lifespan: A multisample study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 126–154.
8.
BalP. M.IzakM. (2021). Paradigms of flexibility: A systematic review of research on workplace flexibility. European Management Review, 18(1), 37–50.
9.
BalfourD. L.WechslerB. (1996). Organizational commitment: Antecedents and outcomes in public organizations. Public Productivity & Management Review, 256–277.
10.
BeauregardT. A.HenryL. C. (2009). Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance. Human Resource Management Review, 19(1), 9–22.
11.
BerkeryE.MorleyM. J.TiernanS.PeretzH. (2020). From start to finish: Flexi-time as a social exchange and its impact on organizational outcomes. European Management Journal, 38(4), 591–601.
12.
BerkowskyR. W. (2013). When you just cannot get away: Exploring the use of information and communication technologies in facilitating negative work/home spillover. Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 519–541.
13.
BlauG. J.BoalK. B. (1987). Conceptualizing how job involvement and organizational commitment affect turnover and absenteeism. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 288–300.
14.
BlauP. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193–206.
15.
BoardmanC.SundquistE. (2009). Toward understanding work motivation: Worker attitudes and the perception of effective public service. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(5), 519–535.
16.
BrimO. G.BaltesP. B.BumpassL.ClearyP. D.FeathermanD. L.HazzardW. R.KesslerR. C.& ShwederR. A. (1999). Midlife in the United States (MIDUS 1), 1995—1996—MIDUS 1—Version 13. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02760.v13
17.
BurdínG.PérotinV. (2019). Employee representation and flexible working time. Labour Economics, 61, 101755.
18.
CaillierJ. G. (2012). The impact of teleworking on work motivation in a US federal government agency. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(4), 461–480.
19.
CaillierJ. G. (2013). Satisfaction with work-life benefits and organizational commitment/job involvement: Is there a connection?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(4), 340–364.
20.
ChenM. K.RossiP. E.ChevalierJ. A.OehlsenE. (2019). The value of flexible work: Evidence from Uber drivers. Journal of Political Economy, 127(6), 2735–2794.
21.
ChesleyN. (2005). Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1237–1248.
22.
ChoY.KimN.LeeM. M.LimJ. H.HanH.ParkH. Y. (2015). South Korean women leaders’ struggles for a work and family balance. Human Resource Development International, 18(5), 521–537.
23.
ChoiS. (2020). Flexible work arrangements and employee retention: A longitudinal analysis of the federal workforces. Public Personnel Management, 49(3), 470–495.
24.
ChristensenK. E.StainesG. L. (1990). Flextime: A viable solution to work/family conflict?Journal of Family Issues, 11(4), 455–476.
25.
CollischonM.EberlA. (2020). Let’s talk about fixed effects: Let’s talk about all the good things and the bad things. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologies, 72(2), 289–299.
26.
ConnellyB. L.CertoS. T.IrelandR. D.ReutzelC. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.
27.
De VriesH.TummersL.BekkersV. (2019). The benefits of teleworking in the public sector: Reality or rhetoric?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(4), 570–593.
28.
EatonS. C. (2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and perceived performance. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42(2), 145–167.
29.
EckenrodeJ.GoreS. (1990). Stress and coping at the boundary of work and family. In EckenrodeJ.GoreS. (Eds), Stress between work and family (pp. 1–16). Springer.
30.
EdwardsJ. R.CaplanR. D.Van HarrisonR. (1998). Person-environment fit theory. Theories of Organizational Stress, 28(1), 67–94.
31.
EisenbergerR.StinglhamberF.VandenbergheC.SucharskiI. L.RhoadesL. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565.
32.
EzraM.DeckmanM. (1996). Balancing work and family responsibilities: Flextime and child care in the federal government. Public Administration Review, 56, 174–179.
33.
FergusonM.CarlsonD.KacmarK. M. (2015). Flexing work boundaries: The spillover and crossover of workplace support. Personnel Psychology, 68(3), 581–614.
34.
FungL. K. H.HuiR. T. Y.YauW. C. W. (2021). Work-life balance of Chinese knowledge workers under flextime arrangement: The relationship of work-life balance supportive culture and work-life spillover. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 1–17.
35.
GaertnerS. (1999). Structural determinants of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in turnover models. Human Resource Management Review, 9(4), 479–493.
36.
GeurtsS. A.DemeroutiE. (2003). Work/non-work interface: A review of theories and findings. The Handbook of Work and Health Psychology, 2(1), 279–312.
37.
GiannikisS. K.MihailD. M. (2011). Flexible work arrangements in Greece: A study of employee perceptions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(02), 417–432.
38.
GoodsteinJ. D. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 350–382.
39.
GradyG.KerraneM.DarcyC.McCarthyA. (2008). Work life balance: Policies and initiatives in Irish organizations: A best practice management guide. Oak Tree Press.
40.
GrandeyA. A.CropanzanoR. (1999). The conservation of resources model applied to work–family conflict and strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(2), 350–370.
41.
GreenD. P.KimS. Y.YoonD. H. (2001). Dirty pool. International Organization, 55(2), 441–468.
42.
GreenhausJ. H.BeutellN. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.
43.
GreenhausJ. H.PowellG. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.
44.
GroeneveldS.VerbeekS. (2012). Diversity policies in public and private sector organizations: An empirical comparison of incidence and effectiveness. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(4), 353–381.
45.
GroverS. L.CrookerK. J. (1995). Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 271–288.
46.
GrzywaczJ. G.MarksN. F. (2000). Family, work, work-family spillover, and problem drinking during midlife. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 336–348.
47.
HaarJ.BroughamD. (2022). Work antecedents and consequences of work-life balance: A two sample study within New Zealand. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(4), 784–807.
48.
HaarJ. M. (2013). Testing a new measure of work–life balance: A study of parent and non-parent employees from New Zealand. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(17), 3305–3324.
49.
HaarJ. M.BardoelE. A. (2008). Positive spillover from the work–family interface: A study of Australian employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 46(3), 275–287.
50.
HeugensP. P.LanderM. W. (2009). Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 61–85.
51.
HobfollS. E.HalbeslebenJ.NeveuJ. P.WestmanM. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103–128.
52.
HögeT.HornungS. (2015). Perceived flexibility requirements: Exploring mediating mechanisms in positive and negative effects on worker well-being. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 36(3), 407–430.
53.
HussainS.MelewarT. C.PriporasC. V.ForoudiP.DennisC. (2020). Examining the effects of celebrity trust on advertising credibility, brand credibility and corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 109, 472–488.
54.
HylandM.ProttasD. (2017). Looking at spillover from both sides: An examination of work and home flexibility and permeability. Community, Work and Family, 20(2), 181–200.
55.
Jeffrey HillE.GrzywaczJ. G.AllenS.BlanchardV. L.Matz-CostaC.ShulkinS.Pitt-CatsouphesM. (2008). Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. Community, Work and Family, 11(2), 149–163.
56.
JohansenM.ZhuL. (2017). Who values diversity? Comparing the effect of manager gender across the public, private, and nonprofit sectors. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 797–809.
57.
KabanoffB. (1980). Work and nonwork: A review of models, methods, and findings. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 60–77.
58.
KarasekR.III.BryantP. (2012). Signaling theory: Past, present, and future. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 11(1), 91.
59.
KarasekR. A.Jr. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308.
60.
KatzD.KahnR. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2, p. 528). Wiley.
61.
KimH.ChoK. (2017). A comparative study on work-family balance and influence factors between public and private organizations. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 26(2), 217–246.
62.
KimJ. S.RyuS. (2017). Employee satisfaction with work-life balance policies and organizational commitment: A Philippine study. Public Administration and Development, 37(4), 260–276.
63.
KimT.MullinsL. B. (2016). How does supervisor support and diversity management affect employee participation in work/family policies?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(1), 80–105.
64.
KimT.MullinsL. B.YoonT. (2021). Supervision of telework: A key to organizational performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(4), 263–277.
65.
KimT.OhM. (2019). Work-life balance promoting policies and practices: The role of organizational culture. Modern Society & Public Administration, 27(4), 147–168.
KossekE. E. (2005). Workplace policies and practices to support work and families: Gaps in implementation and linkages to individual and organizational effectiveness. Workforce/Workplace Mismatch, 56, 97–116.
69.
KossekE. E.LautschB. A. (2018). Work–life flexibility for whom? Occupational status and work–life inequality in upper, middle, and lower level jobs. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 5–36.
70.
KossekE. E.LautschB. A.EatonS. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 347–367.
71.
KossekE. E.PichlerS.BodnerT.HammerL. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work–family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 289–313.
72.
LambertS. J. (1990). Processes linking work and family: A critical review and research agenda. Human Relations, 43(3), 239–257.
73.
LeonidouL. C.CoudounarisD. N.KvasovaO.ChristodoulidesP. (2015). Drivers and outcomes of green tourist attitudes and behavior: Sociodemographic moderating effects. Psychology & Marketing, 32(6), 635–650.
74.
LyonsS. T.DuxburyL. E.HigginsC. A. (2006). A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 605–618.
75.
MastracciS. H. (2013). Time use on caregiving activities: Comparing Federal Government and private sector workers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(1), 3–27.
76.
MeleV.BelléN.CuccinielloM. (2021). Thanks, but no thanks: Preferences towards teleworking colleagues in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(4), 790–805.
77.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.
78.
MeyerJ. P.StanleyD. J.HerscovitchL.TopolnytskyL. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52.
79.
MorrisJ. H.SteersR. M. (1980). Structural influences on organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17(1), 50–57.
80.
MowdayR. T.PorterL. W.SteersR. M. (2013). Employee—organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic press.
81.
MowdayR. T.SteersR. M.PorterL. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247.
82.
Onken-MenkeG.NüeschS.KröllC. (2018). Are you attracted? Do you remain? Meta-analytic evidence on flexible work practices. Business Research, 11, 239–277.
83.
PappasJ. M.FlahertyK. E. (2006). The moderating role of individual-difference variables in compensation research. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(1), 19–35.
84.
ParkS.DooM. Y. (2020). The effect of organizational culture and HR practices on female managers’ commitment and job satisfaction. European Journal of Training and Development, 44(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-03-2019-0045
85.
PerriginoM. B.DunfordB. B.WilsonK. S. (2018). Work–family backlash: The “dark side” of work-life balance (WLB) policies. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 600–630.
86.
PfefferJ. (1981). Understanding the role of power in decision making. In PfefferJ. (Eds.), Power in organizations (pp. 404–423). Pitman.
87.
PieterseM.MostertK. (2005). Measuring work-home interaction: A validation of the Survey Work-Home Interaction Nijmegen (SWING) instrument. Management Dynamics: Journal of the Southern African Institute for Management Scientists, 14(2), 2–15.
88.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.
89.
PodsakoffP. M.OrganD. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.
90.
PowellG. N.GreenhausJ. H. (2010). Sex, gender, and the work-to-family interface: Exploring negative and positive interdependencies. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 513–534.
91.
PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.) (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago press.
92.
PradhanR. K.JenaL. K.KumariI. G. (2016). Effect of work–life balance on organizational citizenship behaviour: Role of organizational commitment. Global Business Review, 17(Suppl. 3), 15S–29S.
93.
PutnamL. L.FairhurstG. T.BanghartS. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171.
94.
QuH.RobichauR. W. (2024). Subjective well-being across the sectors: Examining differences in workers’ life satisfaction and daily experiential well-being. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 44(4), 631–654.
95.
RoehlingP. V.MoenP.BattR. (2003). When work spills over into home and home spills over into work. In MoenP. (Ed.), It’s about time: Couples and careers (pp. 101–121). Cornell University Press.
96.
RogersS. J.MayD. C. (2003). Spillover between marital quality and job satisfaction: Long-term patterns and gender differences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2), 482–495.
97.
RonenS.PrimpsS. B. (1981). The compressed work week as organizational change: Behavioral and attitudinal outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 61–74.
98.
ScanduraT. A.LankauM. J. (1997). Relationships of gender, family responsibility and flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(4), 377–391.
99.
SchnettlerB.Miranda-ZapataE.GrunertK. G.LobosG.LapoM.HuecheC. (2021). Testing the spillover-crossover model between work-life balance and satisfaction in different domains of life in dual-earner households. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16, 1475–1501.
100.
SiegelP. A.PostC.BrocknerJ.FishmanA. Y.GardenC. (2005). The moderating influence of procedural fairness on the relationship between work-life conflict and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 13.
101.
SigrohaA. (2014). Impact of work life balance on working women: A comparative analysis. The Business & Management Review, 5(3), 22.
102.
SimE.HanC. S. (2024). Relumining perceived workplace gender discrimination in South Korea: Examining determinants and paths through decision trees. Human Resource Development International, 27(2), 239–256.
103.
SmithE. F.GilmerD. O.StockdaleM. S. (2019). The importance of culture and support for workplace flexibility: An ecological framework for understanding flexibility support structures. Business Horizons, 62(5), 557–566.
104.
SokJ.BlommeR.TrompD. (2014). Positive and negative spillover from work to home: The role of organizational culture and supportive arrangements. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 456–472.
105.
SolingerO. N.Van OlffenW.RoeR. A. (2008). Beyond the three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 70.
106.
StazykE. C.PandeyS. K.WrightB. E. (2011). Understanding affective organizational commitment: The importance of institutional context. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 603–624.
107.
SteijnB.LeisinkP. (2006). Organizational commitment among Dutch public sector employees. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(2), 187–201.
108.
StinglhamberF.VandenbergheC. (2003). Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(3), 251–270.
109.
SuazoM. M.MartínezP. G.SandovalR. (2009). Creating psychological and legal contracts through human resource practices: A signaling theory perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 19(2), 154–166.
110.
SuhJ.Hijal-MoghrabiI. (2022). The effects of fairness on female managers’ perception of career prospects and job satisfaction: A study across sectors. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(8), 644–657.
111.
SuzukiK.HurH. (2020). Bureaucratic structures and organizational commitment: Findings from a comparative study of 20 European countries. Public Management Review, 22(6), 877–907.
112.
TsenM. K.GuM.TanC. M.GohS. K. (2022). Does flexible work arrangements decrease or increase turnover intention? A comparison between the social exchange theory and border theory. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42(11–12), 962–983.
113.
UnanueW.GómezM. E.CortezD.OyanedelJ. C.Mendiburo-SeguelA. (2017). Revisiting the link between job satisfaction and life satisfaction: The role of basic psychological needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 680.
114.
VandenbergheC.BenteinK.StinglhamberF. (2004). Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 47–71.
115.
Vigoda-GadotE.KapunD. (2005). Perceptions of politics and perceived performance in public and private organisations: A test of one model across two sectors. Policy & Politics, 33(2), 251–276.
116.
WayneJ. H.GrzywaczJ. G.CarlsonD. S.KacmarK. M. (2007). Work–family facilitation: A theoretical explanation and model of primary antecedents and consequences. Human Resource Management Review, 17(1), 63–76.
117.
WeissH. M.CropanzanoR. (1996). Affective events theory. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18(1), 1–74.
118.
WestmanM.EtzionD. L. (2005). The crossover of work-family conflict from one spouse to the other. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(9), 1936–1957.
119.
WestphalJ. D.ZajacE. J. (2001). Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchases programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 202–228.
120.
WhitenerE. M. (2001). Do “high commitment” human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Management, 27(5), 515–535.
121.
WilliamsJ. C.Blair-LoyM.BerdahlJ. L. (2013). Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 209–234.
122.
WolframH. J.GrattonL. (2014). Gender role self-concept, categorical gender, and transactional-transformational leadership: Implications for perceived workgroup performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(4), 338–353.
YahayaR.EbrahimF. (2016). Leadership styles and organizational commitment: Literature review. Journal of Management Development, 35(2), 190–216.
125.
YangY.IslamD. M. T. (2021). Work-life balance and organizational commitment: A study of field level administration in Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(14), 1286–1296.
126.
YousefD. A. (2017). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and attitudes toward organizational change: A study in the local government. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(1), 77–88.
