The Civil Service Reform Act was intended to transform the public sector. This paper draws upon surveys conducted in 1979 by the Office of Personnel Management and in 1986 by the Merit Systems Protection board to contrast federal employee perceptions towards performance appraisal. Identical or nearly identical items included in both surveys tap attitudes that indicate that the new objectives-based performance appraisal system does not appear to have garnered much in the way of added support. Perceptions regarding blanket ratings, participative objectives setting, feedback, the fairness of standards, and the fairness of ratings have changed but little. The change that has occured has been, for the most part, in the way of introducing uncertainty.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ Stacy (1963) “Toward an Understanding of Inequity.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 67 November: 422–476.
2.
BelloneCarl J. (1982) “Structural vs Behavioral Change: The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978,” Review of Public Personnel Administration2, 2 (Spring): 59–67.
3.
ColbyPeter W.IngrahamPatricia W. (1981) “Civil Service Reform: The Views of the Senior Executive Service,” Review of Public Personnel Administration1, 8 (Summer): 75–89.
4.
HuddlestonMark W. (1988) “To The Threshold of Reform: The SES and America's Search for a Higher Civil Service,” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
5.
IngrahamPatricia, and Peter Colby (1982) “Individual Motivation and Institutional Changes Under the Senior Executive Service,” Review of Public Personnel Administration2, 2 (Spring): 101–118.
6.
IngrahamPatricia, and Carolyn Ban (1984) Legislating Bureaucratic Change: The Civil Service Reform Act of 1977. Albany, NY: State University of New York press.
7.
KramerKenneth (1982) “Seeds of Success and Failure: Policy Development and Implementation of the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act,” Review of Public Personnel Administration2, 2 (Spring): 5–20.
8.
LynnNaomi B.VadenRichard E. (1979) “Bureaucratic Response to Civil Service Reform,” Public Administration Review39, 4 (July/August): 333–343.
9.
LynnNaomi B.VadenRichard E. (1980) “Federal Executives: Initial Reaction to Change,” Administration & Society12, 1 (May): 101–120.
10.
MarzottoToni (1986) “The Senior Executive Service: The Balance Between Responsiveness and Capacity,” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
11.
NigroLloyd G. (1981) “Attitudes of Federal Employees Toward Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay: Implication for CSRA Implementation,” Public Administration Review41, 1 (January/February): 84–86.
12.
NigroLloyd G. (1982) “CSRA Performance Appraisals and Merit Pay: Growing Uncertainty in the Federal Work Force,” Public Administration Review42, 2 (July/August): 371–375.
13.
PaganoMichael A. (1984) “The SES Performance Management System and Bonus Awards,” Review of Public Personnel Administration4, 2 (Spring): 40–56.
14.
RomzekBarbara (1985) “The Effects of Public Service Recognition, Job Security and Staff Reductions on Organizational Involvement,” Public Administration Review45, 2 (March/April): 282–291.
15.
RosenBernard (1986) “Crisis in the U.S Civil Service,” Public Administration Review46, 3 (May/June): 207–214.
16.
U.S. Congress. Senate (1978) Civil Service Reform Act. S. 2640, 95th Congress, Chapter 43, PL 95–454.
17.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (1988) Toward Effective Performance Management in the Federal Government. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (July).
18.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (1980) Federal Employee Attitudes: Phase 1: Baseline Survey, 1979. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (March).
19.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (1983) Federal Employee Attitudes; Phase 2: Follow-Up Survey, 1980. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (1984) Federal Employee Attitude Survey; Phase 3, 1983: Preliminary Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (February).
21.
YeagerSamuel J.RabiJackVocinoThomas (1985) “Feedback and Administrative Behavior in the Public Sector” Public Administration Review45, 5 (September/October); 570–575.
