Ideal on Paper,Excluded in Practice: Age and Gender Bias in Job Advertisements

Abstract

Researchers estimate that 20–40% of employers are influenced by bias in hiring decisions, with gender and age discrimination creating barriers, particularly during the attraction phase. We examined whether job ads include implicit preferences through gendered and age-based language. A total of 800 job ads from eight U.S. occupations were analyzed using exploratory latent content analysis, which informed a customized dictionary for linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC). A 2 (industry) × 2 (gender dominance) mixed-design repeated measures ANOVA, we found significant differences in linguistic bias, with language favoring an older woman ideal most prevalent. White-collar industries exhibited higher overall bias, with interactions between industry and gender dominance. Despite this linguistic trend, older women continue to face hiring barriers—a disconnect we call the “older woman paradox.” One explanation may be HR demographics, as women aged 45 + comprise over 75% of HR managers. Implications are discussed.

Keywords

Ageism sexism intersectionality employment discrimination older workers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albert

Escot

Fernández-Cornejo

J. A.

(2011). A field experiment to study sex and age discrimination in the Madrid labour market. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(2), 351–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.540160

Allison

M. T.

(1999). Organizational barriers to diversity in the workplace. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(1), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1999.11949852

Allison

M. T.

(2019). Access and boundary maintenance: Serving culturally diverse populations. In Ewert

A. W.

Chavez

D. J.

Magill

A. W.

(Eds.), Culture, conflict, and communication in the wildland-urban interface (1st ed., pp. 99–107). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429041372-9

Allison

M. T.

Smith

(1990). Leisure and quality of life: Issues facing racial and ethnic minority elderly. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 24(3), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1999.11949852

American Psychological Association. (2022). Implicit bias. https://www.apa.org/topics/implicit-bias

Baert

Norga

Thuy

Van Hecke

(2016). Getting grey hairs in the labour market. An alternative experiment on age discrimination. Journal of Economic Psychology, 57, 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.10.002

Barrick

M. R.

Mount

M. K.

(1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x

Becker

S. O.

Fernandes

Weichselbaumer

(2019). Discrimination in hiring based on potential and realized fertility: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Labour Economics, 59, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.04.009

Bendick

(2007). Situation testing for employment discrimination in the United States of America. Horizons Stratégiques, 5(3), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.3917/hori.005.0017

10.

Bendick

Brown

L. E.

Wall

(1999). No foot in the door: An experimental study of employment discrimination against older workers. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 10(4), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1300/J031v10n04_02

11.

Bendick

Nunes

A. P.

(2012). Developing the research basis for controlling bias in hiring. Journal of Social Issues, 68(2), 238–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01747.x

12.

Berger

E. D.

(2009). Managing age discrimination: An examination of the techniques used when seeking employment. The Gerontologist, 49(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnp031

13.

Burn

Button

Corella

L. M.

Neumark

(2020). Older workers need not apply? Ageist language in job ads and age discrimination in hiring. IZA Institute of Labor Economics. https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/13506/older-workers-need-not-apply-ageist-language-in-job-ads-and-age-discrimination-in-hiring

14.

Burn

Firoozi

Ladd

Neumark

(2022). Help really wanted? The impact of age stereotypes in job ads on applications from older workers. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w30287

15.

Cadiz

D. M.

Brady

G. M.

Yaldiz

L. M.

Zaniboni

Truxillo

D. M.

(2022). Age stereotypes do matter: Looking through the lens of the attraction–selection–attrition model. Work, Aging and Retirement, 8(4), 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waac009

16.

Canetto

S. S.

Kaminski

P. L.

Felicio

D. M.

(1995). Typical and optimal aging in women and men: Is there a double standard? The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 40(3), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.2190/RX0U-T56B-1G0F-266U

17.

Carl, C & Walker, R. V.. (2023, December 16). Ideal on paper, excluded in practice: Age and gender bias in job advertisements [Project page]. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/yfu8p/

18.

Catalyst. (2022). Women in the workforce: United States (Quick Take). https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-the-workforce-united-states/

19.

Celani

Singh

(2011). Signaling theory and applicant attraction outcomes. Personnel Review, 40(2), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481111106093

20.

Collier

Zhang

(2016). Can we reduce bias in the recruiting process and diversify pools of candidates by using different types of words in job descriptions? [Cornell University]. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/items/5ef5bdb8-de13-439e-8eed-3ca3edbddebb

21.

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf

22.

Data

U. S. A.

(2023). Human resources managers. Data USA. https://datausa.io/profile/soc/human-resources-managers

23.

Diekman

A. B.

Eagly

A. H.

(2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262001

24.

Eagly

A. H.

Wood

(1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(3), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291173011

25.

Fiske

S. T.

(2024). Prejudice, discrimination, and stereotyping (In Biswas-Diener

Diener

(Eds)). DEF Publishers. http://noba.to/jfkx7nrd

26.

Frissen

Adebayo

K. J.

Nanda

(2023). A machine learning approach to recognize bias and discrimination in job advertisements. AI & SOCIETY, 38(2), 1025–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01574-0

27.

Gaucher

Friesen

Kay

A. C.

(2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022530

28.

Gogol

(2024). White collar vs. blue collar: What’s the difference? Stilt. https://www.stilt.com/blog/2021/03/white-collar-vs-blue-collar/

29.

Hämmig

(2014). Prevalence and health correlates of work-life conflict among blue- and white-collar workers from different economic sectors. Frontiers in Public Health, 2, 221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00221

30.

Harada

Sugisawa

Sugihara

Yanagisawa

Shimmei

(2019). Perceived age discrimination and job satisfaction among older employed men in Japan. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 89(3), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415018811100

31.

J. C.

Kang

S. K.

Tse

Toh

S. M.

(2019). Stereotypes at work: Occupational stereotypes predict race and gender segregation in the workforce. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103318

32.

Isaac

Lee

Carnes

(2009). Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: A systematic review. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 84(10), 1440–1446. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b6ba00

33.

Johnson

S. K.

(2020). The diversity employers need to remember: Age diversity. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/nextavenue/2020/07/19/the-diversity-employers-need-to-remember-age-diversity/

34.

Kleinheksel

A. J.

Rockich-Winston

Tawfik

Wyatt

T. R.

(2020). Demystifying content analysis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 7113. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7113

35.

Kochhar

(2023). The enduring grip of the gender pay gap. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/03/01/the-enduring-grip-of-the-gender-pay-gap/

36.

Koenig

A. M.

(2018). Comparing prescriptive and descriptive gender stereotypes about children, adults, and the elderly. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01086

37.

Lahey

(2005). Age, women, and hiring: An experimental study (w11435; p. w11435). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w11435

38.

McCall

(2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800

39.

McDonald

Damarin

A. K.

Lawhorne

Wilcox

Vallas

S. P.

Kovalainen

(2019). Black holes and purple squirrels: A tale of two online labor markets. In Work and labor in the digital age (Vol. 33, pp. 93–120). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320190000033006

40.

McGann

Ong

Bowman

Duncan

Kimberley

Biggs

(2016). Gendered ageism in Australia: Changing perceptions of age discrimination among older men and women. Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 35(4), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12155

41.

Mehl

M. R.

(2006). Quantitative text analysis. In Eid

Diener

(Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 141–156). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11383-011

42.

Neumark

(2019). Age discrimination in the U.S. Labor market. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 43(3), 51–58.

43.

Neumark

Burn

Button

(2019). Is it harder for older workers to find jobs? New and improved evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Political Economy, 127(2), 922–970. https://doi.org/10.1086/701029

44.

Neumark

Burn

Button

Chehras

(2018). Do state laws protecting older workers from discrimination reduce age discrimination in hiring? Evidence from a field experiment (w25369; p. w25369). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25369

45.

T. W. H.

Feldman

D. C.

(2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392

46.

Parietti

Soricelli

Jasperson

H. D.

(2023). Blue-collar vs. white-collar: What’s the difference? Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/wealth-management/120215/blue-collar-vs-white-collar-different-social-classes.asp

47.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Francis

M. E.

Booth

R. J.

(1999). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246699633_Linguistic_inquiry_and_word_count_LIWC

48.

Perron

(2018). The value of experience: Age discrimination against older workers persists. AARP Research. https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00177.002

49.

Polizzi

K. G.

Millikin

R. J.

(2002). Attitudes toward the elderly: Identifying problematic usage of ageist and overextended terminology in research instructions. Educational Gerontology, 28(5), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270290081344

50.

Raub

(2018). Bots, bias and big data: Artificial intelligence, algorithmic bias and disparate impact liability in hiring practices. Arkansas Law Review, 71(2), 529.

51.

Ridgway

Oldridge

Mavin

(2025). ‘Leading’ by example? Gendered language in human resource job adverts. Human Resource Management Journal, 35(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12549

52.

Rooth

D.-O.

(2021). Correspondence testing studies. IZA World of Labor. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.58.v2

53.

Schneider

(1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x

54.

Spence

(1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

55.

Statista. (2023). Share of human resources managers in the United States in 2023, by gender. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1088059/share-human-resources-managers-united-states-gender/

56.

Stenberg

S. J.

Hogg

(2020). Persuasive acts: Women’s rhetorics in the twenty-first century. University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvwrm691

57.

Tausczik

Y. R.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676

58.

Tierney

W. G.

Bensimon

E. M.

(1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. SUNY Press .

59.

Tokarz

R. E.

Mesfin

(2021). Stereotyping ourselves: Gendered language use in management and instruction library job advertisements. Journal of Library Administration, 61(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2021.1883368

60.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022). Women in the labor force: A Databook BLS Reports. (BLS Reports Report 1097). https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-databook/2021/home.htm

61.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023a). Civilian labor force participation rate. https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-labor-force-participation-rate.htm

62.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023b). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11b.htm

63.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025a). Occupational Outlook Handbook. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/

64.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025b). Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm

65.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). Current population survey, basic monthly microdata. https://data.census.gov/mdat/

66.

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2021a). Age discrimination in employment act (charges filed with EEOC) FY 1997—FY 2021. https://www.eeoc.gov/data/age-discrimination-employment-act-charges-filed-eeoc-includes-concurrent-charges-title-vii-ada

67.

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2021b). Sex-based charges (charges filed with EEOC) FY 1997—FY 2021. https://www.eeoc.gov/data/sex-based-charges-charges-filed-eeoc-fy-1997-fy-2021

68.

Walker

R. V.

Zelin

A. I.

(2021). “You’re too young/old for this”: The intersection of ageism and sexism in the workplace. In Cole

Hollis-Sawyer

(Eds.), Older women who work: Resilience, choice, and change (pp. 161–187). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000212-010

69.

Wille

Derous

(2018). When job ads turn you down: How requirements in job ads may stop instead of attract highly qualified women. Sex Roles, 79(7–8), 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0877-1

70.

Yanico

B. J.

(1978). Sex bias in career information: Effects of language on attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(78)90068-4