Differential item functioning of the CAGE,TWEAK,BMAST and AUDIT by gender and ethnicity

Abstract

A number of screening instruments for alcohol dependence (AD) or problem drinking are currently in use in primary care settings. This study tests for differential item functioning by gender and ethnicity of the CAGE, TWEAK, brief MAST (BMAST), and AUDIT in 492 emergency room patients with lifetime drinking experience. As the referent standard, the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) was used to establish whether the participant was either alcohol dependent or a harmful drinker according to ICD-10 criteria. Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses suggested that 38% of the items on the four screening instruments showed either gender or ethnic DIF.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barry

K.L.

& Fleming

M.F.

(1993). The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) and the SMAST-13: Predictive validity in a rural primary care sample. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 28 33–42.

Bernadt

Taylor

Mumford

Smith

& Murray

R.M.

(1982). Comparison of questionnaire and laboratory tests in the detection of excessive drinking and alcoholism. Lancet, 8267 325–328.

Camilli

& Shepard

L.A.

(1994). Methods for identifying biased test items (Vol. 4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Chan

A.W.K.

Pristach

E.A.

Weite

J.W.

& Russell

(1993). Use of the TWEAK test in screening for alcoholism/heavy drinking in three populations. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 17 1188–1192.

Cherpitel

C.J.

(1995a). Analysis of cut points for screening instruments for alcohol problems in the ER. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56 695–700.

Cherpitel

C.J.

(1995b). Screening for alcohol problems in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 26 158–166.

Cherpitel

C.J.

& Clark

W.B.

(1995). Ethnic differences in performance of screening instruments for identifying harmful drinking and alcohol dependence in the ER. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 19 628–634.

Cohen

(1994). The earth is round (p <. 05). American Psychologist, 49 997–1003.

Ewing

J. A.

(1984). Detecting alcoholism: The CAGE questionnaire. Journal of the American Medical Association, 252 1905–1907.

10.

Fleming

M.F.

& Barry

K.L.

(1989). A study examining the psychometric properties of the SMAST-13. Journal of Substance Abuse, 1 173–182.

11.

Girela

Villanueva

Hernandez-Cueto

& Luna

J.D.

(1994). Comparison of the CAGE questionnaire versus some biochemical markers in the diagnosis of alcoholism. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 29 337–343.

12.

Hsiao

J.K.

Bartko

J.J.

& Potter

W.Z.

(1989). Diagnosing diagnoses: Receiver operating characteristic methods and psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46 323–338.

13.

Ives

K.H.

& Gibbons

J.D.

(1967). A correlation measure for nominal data. American Statistician, 21 166–170.

14.

Magruder-Habib

Stevens

H.A.

& Alling

W.C.

(1993). Relative performance of the MAST, VAST, and CAGE versus DSM-III-R criteria for alcohol dependence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46 435–441.

15.

McClelland

G.H.

& Judd

C.M.

(1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114 376–390.

16.

Mehta

& Patel

(1992). LogXact Turbo. Cambridge, MA: CYTEL Software Corporation.

17.

Millsap

R.E.

& Everson

H.T.

(1993). Methodology review: Statistical approaches for assessing measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17 297–334.

18.

Nunnally

J.C.

& Bernstein

(1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

19.

Ross

H.E.

Gavin

D.R.

& Skinner

H.A.

(1990). Diagnostic validity of the MAST and the alcohol dependence scale in the assessment of DSM-III alcohol disorders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 51 506–513.

20.

Russell

Martier

S.S.

Sokol

R.J.

Mudar

Bottoms

Jacobson

& Jacobson

(1994). Screening for pregnancy risk-drinking. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 18 1156–1161.

21.

Saunders

J.B.

& Aasland

O.G.

(1987). WHO collaborative project on identification and treatment of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. Report on phase I development of a screening instrument (Report No. WHO/MNH/DAT/86.3). World Health Organization, Division of Mental Health.

22.

Selvin

(1992). Statistical analysis of epidemiologic data (pp. 187–189). New York: Oxford University Press.

23.

Selzer

(1971). The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: The quest for a new diagnostic instrument. American Journal of Psychiatry, 127 1653–1658.

24.

Skinner

H.A.

Holt

M.B.

Schuller

M.S.

Roy

& Israel

(1984). Identification of alcohol abuse using laboratory tests and a history of trauma. Annals of Internal Medicine, 101 847–851.

25.

Soderstrom

C.A.

Dischinger

P.C.

Smith

G.S.

McDuff

D.R.

Hebel

J.R.

& Gorelick

D.A.

(1992). Psychoactive substance dependence among trauma center patients. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267 2756–2759.

26.

Steinweg

D.L.

& Worth

(1993). Alcoholism: The keys to the CAGE. The American Journal of Medicine, 94 520–523.

27.

Swaminathan

& Rogers

H.J.

(1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27 361–370.

28.

Whitney

R.B.

(1983). Alcoholics in emergency rooms. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 59 1043–1050.

29.

World Health Organization (1989). Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Geneva: World Health Organization.

30.

Yates

Hadfield

& Peters

(1987). The detection of problem drinkers in the accident and emergency departments. British Journal of Addiction, 82 163–167.