American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges (AMATYC). (1994, October). Standardsfor introductory college mathematics (Draft). Memphis, TN: Author.
2.
Anthony, John. (1991). Involvement in learning: Its impact on student outcomes. Community/Junior College Quarterly of Research and Practice, 15(4), 391-394.
3.
Association of American Colleges. (1990). Study of the arts and sciences major, challenges for college mathematics: An agenda for the next decade. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
4.
Feldt, Constance Curley. (1993, May). Becoming a teacher of mathematics: A constructive, interactive process. Mathematics Teacher, 86(5), 400-403.
Guckin, Alice Mae, & Morrison, Dwight. (1991, February). Math*Logo: A project to develop proportional reasoning in college freshmen. School Science and Mathematics, 91(2), 77-81.
7.
Johnston, W. B., & Packer, A. E. (1987). Workforce 2000: Work and workers for the twenty-first century. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.
8.
National Assessment Governing Board. (1991). National assessment of educational progress (NAEP): The levels of mathematics achievement, initial performance standardsfor the 1990 NAEP mathematics assessment (Vol. 1, National and state summaries). Washington, DC: Author.
9.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
10.
National Research Council, Committee on the Mathematical Sciences in The Year 2000. (1991). Moving beyond myths: Revitalizing undergraduate mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11.
Noddings, Nel. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
Norwood, Karen S. (1994, May). The effect of instructional approach on mathematics anxiety and achievement. School Science and Mathematics, 94(5), 248-254.
13.
Pincus, Fred L., & Decamp, Suzanne. (1989). Who transfers to four-year colleges? A study of a matched sample of B. A. recipients. Community! Junior College Quarterly of Research and Practice, 13, 191-219.
14.
Pogrow, Stanley. (1992). A validated approach to thinking development for at-risk populations. In Cathy Collins & John N. Mangieri (Eds.), Teaching thinking: An agenda for the twenty-first century, pp. 87-101. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
Prichard, Mary Kim. (1993, December). Applying the standards to the college mathematics classroom: Ideas and obstacles. Mathematics Teacher, 86(9), 744-747.
16.
Reeuwijk, Martin van. (1992, October). The standards applied: Teaching data visualization (curriculum and evaluation standards). Mathematics Teacher, 85(7), 513-518.
17.
Romberg, Thomas A. (1992). Mathematics learning and teaching: What we have learned in ten years. In Cathy Collins & John N. Mangieri (Eds.), Teaching thinking: An agenda for the twenty-first century (pp. 49-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18.
Schoenfeld, Alan H. (1987). Cognitive science and mathematics education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
Tinzmann, Margaret, Jones, Beau Fly, & Pierce, Jean. (1992). Changing societal needs: Changing how we think about curriculum and instruction. In Cathy Collins & John N. Mangieri (Eds.), Teaching thinking: An agenda for the twenty-first century (pp. 185-220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.