Intelligent Design Psychology and Evolutionary Psychology on Consciousness: Turning Water into Wine

Abstract

From the titles of some recent evolutionary psychology publications on the mind, one could get the impression that the mystery of consciousness has been solved, but serious questions and doubts persist. Many scientists have deep reservations about Darwinian theory. Some of these scientists promote the Intelligent Design movement, which has received recent attention from scholars in biology, biochemistry, mathematics, philosophy, and theology. Intelligent Design theory both challenges the naturalistic evolutionary account of life and proposes an alternative scientific research program. Its aim is to investigate the natural world for evidence of divine causes and to detect the patterns or fingerprints of an intelligent designer. The implications of this theory for the field of psychology are examined, and a new field, a Christian version of Intelligent Design Psychology (IDP_C) is proposed. The article then briefly compares the psychological implications of IDP_C with its chief rival, a naturalistic version of evolutionary psychology (EP_N), in relation to consciousness and self-consciousness, including why these phenomena provide serious difficulties for EP_N, while at the same time providing positive support for IDP_C. Both approaches are examined for their comparative abilities to describe, explain, and predict various facets of human persons that center on consciousness and self-conscious emotions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barkow

, Cosmides

, & Tooby

(Eds.). (1992). The adapted mind. New York: Oxford University Press

Behe

(1996). Darwin's black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Buss

D. M.

(1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.

Buss

D. M.

(1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Needhan Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Carter

B. M.

(1999). Consciousness explained? Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 51(2), 78–86.

Chalmers

D. J.

(1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Chalmers

D. J.

(2001). Consciousness and its place in nature. [On-line]. Available: http//www.u.arizona.edu/∼chalmers/papers/belief.html

Churchland

(1994). Matter and consciousness. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Cosmides

, & Tooby

(1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In Barkow

, Cosmides

, & Tooby

(Eds.), The adapted mind. New York: Oxford University Press

10.

Dembski

W. A.

(1998a, October). Science and design. First Things, 21–27.

11.

Dembski

W. A.

(1998b). The design inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Dembski

W. A.

(1999). Intelligent design: The bridge between science and theology. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

13.

Dennett

D. C.

(1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Back Bay Books.

14.

Discovery Institute (2001). A Scientific Dissent on Darwinism. (Available from Discovery Institute)

15.

Fodor

J. A.

(1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

16.

Gould

S. J.

(2000). More things in heaven and earth. In Rose

, & Rose

(Eds.), Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology (pp. 85–105). New York: Harmony Books.

17.

Grace

C. R.

(2001). The Pleistocene mind: A critical review of evolutionary psychology, and an introduction to intelligent design psychology. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 29, 289–300.

18.

Kim

(1996). Philosophy of mind. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

19.

Kim

(1998). Mind in a physical world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

20.

Looren DeJong

, & Van Der Steen

W. J.

(1998). Biological thinking in evolutionary psychology: Rockbottom or quicksand? Philosophical Psychology, 11(2), 183–206.

21.

McGinn

(1999). The mysterious flame. New York: Basic Books.

22.

Moreland

J. P.

(2001). Intelligent design psychology and evolutionary psychology: A comparison of rival paradigms. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 29, 361–377.

23.

Myers

S. C.

(1994). The methodological equivalence of design and descent: Can there be a scientific “theory of creation”? In Moreland

J. P.

(Ed.), The creation hypothesis (pp. 67–112). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

24.

Natsoulas (1998). Consciousness and self-awareness. In Ferrari

, & Sternberg

R. J.

(Eds.), Self-awareness: Its nature and development (pp. 12–33). New York: Guilford Press.

25.

Oxford English Dictionary. (1989).

26.

Parker

S. T.

(1998). A social selection model for the evolution and adaptive significance of self-conscious emotions. In Ferrari

, & Sternberg

R. J.

(Eds.), Self-awareness: Its nature and development (pp. 108–134). New York: Guilford Press.

27.

Peacocke

, & Gillette

(Eds.). (1987). Persons and personality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

28.

Pinker

(1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.

29.

Plantinga

(1993). Warrant and proper function. New York: Oxford University Press.

30.

Polkinghorne

(1998). Quantum metaphysics. Interviewed by Giberson

, Hill

, & Yerxa

Books and culture: A Christian review, 4(5), 30–33.

31.

Rose

, & Rose

(2000). Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology. New York: Harmony Books.

32.

Ruse

(1989). Evolutionary theory and Christian ethics. In Name (Ed.), The Darwinian paradigm (pp. 262–269). London: Routledge.

33.

Searle

(1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

34.

Skinner

B. F.

(1990). “Can psychology be a science of mind?” American Psychologist, 45, 1207.

35.

Smith

B. H.

(2000). Sewing up the mind. In Rose

, & Rose

(Eds.), Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology. New York: Harmony Books.

36.

Wells

(2000). Icons of evolution. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing.