Recent thinking in positive psychology has promoted the idea that positive and moral emotions facilitate prosocial (perhaps caring) behavior (Fredrickson, 2004; Haidt, 2003a). One prominent theory proposes that certain affective dispositions (e.g., empathy, gratitude) serve as “moral motives” for prosocial action, as they provide a link between other facets of moral character and prosocial action (McCullough, Kilpatrick, Emmons, and Larsen, 2001). Following this line of thought, and the social intuitionist model of moral motivation (SIM motivation) presented in Part 2, this article introduces (hypothesizes) a conceptual model of ten moral emotion-related capacities (virtues) that recent research suggests may be fundamental to a flourishing capacity for generative care: trust, love, elevation, empathy, compassion, gratitude, positive pride, guilt, forgiveness, and humility. The objectives of this article are, first, to describe this model; second, to suggest future directions for theoretical and empirical development of the model; and third, to discuss how it contributes to the emerging relational spirituality paradigm (Hall, 2004; Shults & Sandage, 2006). The article proposes that these moral affective capacities (MACs) represent one plausible model of the “virtues of acknowledged dependence” (MacIntyre, 1999), an “ecology of virtue” that describes the nature of a flourishing relational environment (Flanagan, 2007), and capacities that likely motivate and enable Christian kenotic love (Polkinghorne, 2001). The article concludes by looking ahead to future discussions of emotion and transformation in the relational spirituality paradigm, specifically the nature of the moral dilemma that persons encounter as they strive to develop a virtuous character (Leffel, 2007c).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AspinwallL. G. (2001). Dealing with adversity: Self-regulation, coping, adaptation, and health. In TesserA., & SchwarzN. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Vol. 1. Individual processes (pp. 591–614). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
2.
BatsonD. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social psychological answer.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
BatsonC. D., KobrynowiczJ. L., DinnersteinJ. L., KampfH. C., & WilsonA. D. (1997). In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1335–1348.
4.
BeerJ. S. (2007). Neural systems for self-conscious emotions and their underlying appraisals. In TracyJ. L., RobinsR. W., & TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research (pp. 21–37). New York: Guilford Press.
5.
BrunsteinJ. C., SchultheissO. C., & GrassmannR. (1998). Personal goals and emotional well-being: The moderating role of motive dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 494–508.
6.
BersheidE. (2006). Searching for the meaning of love. In SternbergR. J., & WeisK. (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 171–183). New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
7.
BlasiA. (1984). Moral identity: Its role in moral functioning. In KurtinessW. M., & GewitzJ. L. (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 128–139). New York: Wiley & Sons.
8.
BlasiA. (2001). Moral motivation and society: Internalization and the development of the self. In DuxG., & WelkF. (Eds.), Moral und Recht im Diskurs der Moderne. Zur Legitmation gesellschaftlicher Oddung (pp. 313–329). Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
9.
BrandstadterJ. (1999). The self in action and development: Cultural, biosocial, and ontogenetic bases of intentional self-development. In BrandstadterJ., & LernerR. M. (Eds.), Action and self-development: Theory and research through the life span (pp. 37–66). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10.
BrowningD. S. (1987). Religious thought and the modern psychologies: A critical conversation in the theology of culture.Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
11.
BrowningD. S. (2006). Christian ethics and the moral psychologies.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmaans.
12.
BuckR. (2004). The gratitude of exchange and the gratitude of caring: A developmental-interactionist perspective of moral emotion. In EmmonsR. A., & McCulloughM. E. (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude (pp. 100–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
BurnsA. B., BrownJ. S., Sachs-EricssonN., PlantE. A., CurtisJ. T., FredricksonB. L., & JoinerT. E. (2008). Upward spirals of positive emotion and coping: Replication, extension, and initial exploration of neurochemical substrates. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 360–370.
14.
CapraraG. V., & StecaP. (2007). Prosocial agency: The contribution of values and self-efficacy beliefs to prosocial behavior across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 218–240.
15.
ChangE. C., & SannaL. J. (2003). Virtue, vice, and personality: The complexity of behavior.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
ChurchlandP. M. (1998). Toward a cognitive neurobiology of the moral virtues. Topoi, 17, 83–96.
17.
ClarkM. S., & MoninJ. K. (2006). Giving and receiving communal responsiveness as love. In SternbergR. J., & WeisK. (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 200–221). New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
18.
ColbyA., & DamonW. (1995). The development of extraordinary moral commitment. In KillenM., & HartD. (Eds.), Morality in everyday life: Development perspectives (pp. 343–369). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.
20.
deWaalF. (1996). Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
DorisJ. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior.New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
EisenbergN., & MillerP. A. (1987). Empathy, sympathy, and altruism: Empirical and conceptual links. In EisenbergN., & StrayerJ. (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 292–316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
EllisG. F. R. (2001). Kenosis as a unifying theme for life and cosmology. In PolkinghorneJ. (Ed.), The work of love: Creation as kenosis.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company.
24.
EmdeR. N. (1983). The prerepresentational self and its affective core. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 38, 165–192.
25.
EmdeR., JohnsonW. F., & EasterbrooksM. A. (1988). The “do's” and “don'ts” of early moral development: Psychoanalytic tradition and current research. In KaganJ., & LambS. (Eds.), The emergence of morality (pp. 245–277). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
EmmonsR. (2004a). The psychology of gratitude: An introduction. In EmmonsR. A., & McCulloughM. E. (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
EmmonsR. (2004b). Personal goals, life meaning, and virtue: Wellsprings of a positive life. In KeyesC. L. M., & HaidtJ. (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 105–128). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
EmmonsR. A., & McCulloughM. E. (2004). The psychology of gratitude.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
EriksonE. H. (1982/1997). The life cycle completed.New York: W. W. Norton.
30.
EriksonE. H. (2000). The golden rule in the light of new insight. In ColesR. (Ed.), The Erik Erikson Reader (pp. 445–464). New York: W. W. Norton.
31.
ExlineJ. J., BaumeisterR. F., BushmanB. J., CampbellW. K., & FinkelE. J. (2004). Too proud to let go: Narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 894–912.
32.
FeshbachN. D. (1975). Empathy in children: Some theoretical and empirical considerations. Counseling Psychologist, 5, 25–30.
33.
FisherH. (2006). The drive to love: The neural mechanism for mate selection. In SternbergR. J., & WeisK. (Eds.). The new psychology of love (pp. 87–115). New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
34.
FlanaganW. (1991). Varieties of moral personality: Ethics and psychological realism.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
FlanaganO. (2002). The problem of the soul: Two visions of the mind and how to reconcile them.New York: Basic Books.
36.
FlanaganO. (2007). The really hard problem: Meaning in a material world.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
ForgasJ. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66.
38.
FoshaD. (2000). The transforming power of affect: A model for accelerated change.New York: Basic Books.
39.
FredricksonB. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.
40.
FredricksonB. (2004). Gratitude, like other positive emotions, broadens and builds. In EmmonsR. A., & McCulloughM. E. (Eds.). The psychology of gratitude (pp. 145–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
FrommE. (1956/2000). The art of loving.New York: Bantam Books.
43.
GabbardG. O., & WestenD. (2003). Rethinking therapeutic action. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84, 823–841.
44.
GableS. L., ReisH. T., ImpettE. A., & AsherE. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228–245.
45.
GibbardA. (1990). Wise choices, apt feelings: A theory of normative judgment.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
GolemanD. (2003). Destructive emotions: How can we overcome them?New York: Bantam Books.
47.
GrahamS. (1988). Children's developing understanding of the motivational role of affect: An attributional analysis. Cognitive Development, 3, 71–88.
48.
GreenwaldA. G., McGheeD. E., & SchwartzD. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
49.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.
50.
HaidtJ. (2003a). The moral emotions. In DavidsonR. J., SchererK. R., & GoldsmithH. H. (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
HaidtJ. (2003b). Elevation and the positive psychology of morality. In KeyesC. L. M., & HaidtJ. (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 275–289). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
52.
HaidtJ. (2006). The happiness hypothesis: Finding modern truth in ancient wisdom.New York: Basic Books.
53.
HaidtJ. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, May, 998–1002.
54.
HaidtJ. (2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 65–72.
HaidtJ., & JosephC. (in press). The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In CarruthersP., LaurenceS., & StichS. (Eds.), The innate mind, Vol. 3.
57.
HallT. (2004). Christian spirituality and mental health: A relational spirituality paradigm for empirical research. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 23, 66–81.
58.
HareJ. E. (2001). God's call: Moral realism, God's commands, and human autonomy.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdman's Publishing.
59.
HartD., & FegleyS. (1995). Prosocial behavior and caring in adolescence: Relations to self-understanding and social judgment. Child Development, 66, 1346–1359.
60.
HauerwasS. (1981). A community of character: Toward a constructive Christian social ethic.Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
61.
HauserM. D. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong.New York: HarperCollins.
62.
JamesW. (1902/2004). The varieties of religious experience.New York: Barnes & Noble Classics.
KitwoodT. (1990). Concern for others: A new psychology of conscience and morality.New York: Routledge.
65.
KotvaJ. (1996). The Christian case for virtue ethics.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
66.
KrautR. (2007). What is good, and why: The ethics of well-being.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
LapsleyD. K. (1996). Moral psychology.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
68.
LapsleyD. K., & PowerF. C. (2005). Character psychology and character education.Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
69.
LazarusR. S., & LazarusB. N. (1994). Passion and reason: Making sense of our emotions.New York: Oxford University Press.
70.
Le DouxJ. (1996). The emotional brain.New York: Simon & Schuster.
71.
LeffelG. M. (2007a). Emotion and transformation in the relational spirituality paradigm, Part 1: Prospects and prescriptions for reconstructive dialogue. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 35, 263–280.
72.
LeffelG. M. (2007c). Emotion and transformation in the relational spirituality paradigm, Part 3: A moral motive analysis. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 35, 298–316.
73.
LeffelG. M., & FritzM. (2007d). Moral emotions of caring character: A conceptual model and empirical review for programmatic research. Symposium paper presentation at the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Denver, CO, April, 2007.
74.
LyubomirskyS., SheldonK. M., & SchkadeD. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131.
75.
MacIntyreA. (1984). After virtue.Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
McClellandD. C. (1985). Motivational factors in health and disease. American Psychologist, 44, 675–683.
78.
McClellandD. C., KoestnerR., & WeinbergerJ. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ?Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.
79.
McCulloughM. E. (2000). Forgiveness as human strength: Theory, measurement, and links to well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 43–55.
80.
McCulloughM. E., & SnyderC. R. (2000). Classical sources of human strength: Revisiting an old home and building a new one. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 1–10.
81.
McCulloughM. E., KilpatrickS. D., EmmonsR. A., & LarsenD. B. (2001). Gratitude as moral affect. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 249–266.
82.
McCulloughM. E., EmmonsR. A., & TsangJ. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical typology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112–127.
83.
MurphyN. (2005). Theological resources for integration. In DueckA., & LeeC. (Eds.), Why psychology needs theology: A radical-reformation perspective (pp. 3–27). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company.
84.
MurphyN., & EllisG. F. R. (1996). On the moral nature of the universe: Theology, cosmology, and ethics.Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
85.
OtakeK., ShimaiS., Tanaka-MatsumiJ., OtsuiK., & FredricksonB. L. (2006). Happy people become happier through kindness: A counting kindnesses intervention. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 361–375.
86.
OrtonyA., CloreG. L., & CollinsA. (1988). The cognitive structure of the emotions.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87.
PaloutzianR. F., & ParkC. L. (2005). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality.New York: Guilford Press.
88.
PankseppJ. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions.New York: Oxford University Press.
89.
ParkN., PetersonC., & SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 603–619.
90.
PetersonB. E., & StewartA. J. (1996). Antecedents and contexts of generativity motivation at midlife. Psychology and Aging, 11, 21–33.
91.
PolkinghorneJ. (2001). Kenotic creation and divine action. In PolkinghorneJ. (Ed.), The work of love: Creation as kenosis (pp. 90–106). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company.
92.
PostS., UnderwoodL., SchlossJ., & HurlbutW. (Eds.) (2002). Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93.
RempelJ. K., HolmesJ. G., & ZannaM. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–112.
94.
RobertsR. C. (2004). The blessings of gratitude: A conceptual analysis. In EmmonsR. A., & McCulloughM. E. (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude (pp. 58–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
95.
RosenbergE. L. (1998). Levels of analysis and the organization of affect. Review of General Psychology, 2, 247–270.
96.
RubinJ. B. (2004). The good life: Psychoanalytic reflections on love, ethics, creativity, and spirituality.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
97.
RyffC. D., & KeyesC. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.
98.
SandageS. J. (1999). An ego-humility model of forgiveness: Theoretical foundations. Marriage & Family: A Christian Journal, 2, 359–276.
99.
SandageS. J., & HillP. C. (2001). The virtues of positive psychology: The rapprochement and challenges of an affirmative postmodern perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 31, 241–260.
100.
SchmittD. P. (2006). Evolutionary and cross-cultural perspectives on love: The influence of gender, personality, and local ecology on emotional investment in romantic relationships. In SternbergR. J., & WeisK. (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 249–273). New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
101.
ShaverP. R., & MikulncerM. (2006). A behavioral systems approach to romantic love relationships: Attachment, caregiving, and sex. In SternbergR. J., & WeisK. (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 35–64). New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
102.
SheldonK. M., & LyubomirskyS. (2004). Achieving sustainable new happiness: Prospects, practices, and prescriptions. In LinleyA., & JosephsS. (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 127–145). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
103.
SheltonC. M. (2004). Gratitude: Considerations from a moral perspective. In EmmonsR. A., & McCulloughM. E. (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude (pp. 257–281). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
104.
ShermanN. (2000). Wise emotions. In BrownW. S. (Ed.), Understanding wisdom: Sources, science, and society (pp. 319–335). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.
105.
ShulmanM. (2002). How we become moral: The sources of moral motivation. In SnyderC. R., & LopezS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 499–512). New York: Oxford University Press.
106.
ShultsF. L., & SandageS. J. (2006). Transforming spirituality: Integrating theology and psychology.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.
107.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.
108.
ShwederR. A., MuchN. C., MahapatraM., & ParkL. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In BrandtA., & RozinP. (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). New York: Routledge.
109.
SiegelD. J. (1999). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are.New York: Guilford Press.
110.
SloteM. (2000). Virtue ethics. In LaFolletteH. (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to ethical theory (pp. 325–347). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
111.
SnyderC.R. (2000). The past and possible futures of hope. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 11–28.
112.
SolomonR. C. (2004). Foreword. In EmmonsR. A., & McCulloughM. E. (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude (pp. v–xi). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
113.
SperberD. (2005). Modularity and relevance: How can a massively modular mind be flexible and context-sensitive? In CarruthersP., LaurenceS., & StichS. (Eds.), The innate mind: Structure and contents (pp. 530–68). New York: Oxford University Press.
114.
StaatsS., & ElisonJ. (2007). Is there really such a thing as looking guilty? Paper presentation at the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Denver, CO, April, 2007.
115.
SternD. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life.New York: W. W. Norton.
116.
SternbergR. J., & WeisK. (2006). The new psychology of love.New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
117.
TangneyJ. P. (1991). Moral affect: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 598–607.
118.
TangneyJ. P. (2000). Humility: Theoretical perspectives, empirical findings, and directions for future research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 70–82.
119.
TangneyJ. P. (2002). Self-conscious emotions: The self as a moral guide. In TesserA., StapelD. A., & WoodJ. V. (Eds.), Self and motivation: Emerging psychological perspectives (pp. 97–117). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
120.
TangneyJ. P., & FischerK. W. (1995). Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride.New York: Guilford Press.
121.
TangneyJ. P., StuewigJ., & MashekD. J. (2007). What's moral about the self-conscious emotions? In TracyJ. L., RobinsR. W., and TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research (pp. 21–37). New York: Guilford Press.
122.
TomkinsS. (1970). Affect as the primary motivational system. In ArnoldM. (Ed.), Feelings and emotions (pp. 101–110). New York: Academic Press.
123.
TracyJ. L., RobinsR. W., TangneyJ. P. (2007). The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research.New York: Guilford Press.
124.
UnderwoodL. G. (1999). The human experience of compassionate love. In PostS., UnderwoodL., SchlossJ., & HurlbutW. (Eds.), Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
125.
WalshF. (1998). Strengthening family resilience.New York: Guilford Press.
126.
WardK. (2001). Cosmos and kenosis. In PolkinghorneJ. (Ed.), The work of love: Creation as kenosis.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company.
127.
WatkinsP. C. (2004). Gratitude and subjective well-being. In EmmonsR. A., & McCulloughM. E. (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude (pp. 167–192). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
128.
WestenD. (2002). Implications of developments in cognitive neuroscience for psychodynamic psychotherapy. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 10, 369–373.
129.
WestenD., & GabbardG. O. (2002). Developments in cognitive neuroscience: I: Conflict, compromise, and connectionism. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 50, 54–98.
130.
WestenD., LohrE. E., SilkK., GoldL., & KerberK (1990). Object relations and social cognition in borderlines, major depressives, and normals: A thematic apperception test analysis. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 355–364.
131.
WigginsJ. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior In GroveW. W., & CicchettiD. (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology, Vol. 2: Personality and psychotherapy (pp. 89–113). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
132.
WitvlietC. V., LudwigT. E., & BauerD. J. (2002). Please forgive me: Transgressors’ emotions and physiology during imagery of seeking forgiveness and victim responses. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 21, 219–233.
133.
WoodruffP. (2001). Reverence: Renewing a forgotten virtue.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
134.
WorthingtonE. L. (1998). The pyramid model of forgiveness: Some interdisciplinary speculations about unforgiveness and the promotion of forgiveness. In WorthingtonE. L. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives (pp. 107–137). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.
135.
WorthingtonE. L., & BerryJ. W. (2005). Virtues, vices, and character education. In MillerW. R., & DelaneyH. D. (Eds.), Judeo-Christian perspectives on psychology (pp. 145–164). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
136.
WorthingtonE. L., SharpC. B., LernerA. J., & SharpJ. R. (2006). Interpersonal forgiveness as an example of loving one's enemies. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 33–42.
137.
WrenT (1991). Caring about morality: Philosophical perspectives in moral psychology.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
138.
ZilbergN. J., WallersteinR. S., DeWittK. N., HartleyD., & RosenbergS. E. (1991). A conceptual analysis and strategy for assessing structural change. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 14, 317–342.
