Relational Integration,Part I: Differentiated Relationality between Psychology and Theology

Abstract

In Part I of a two-part manuscript, we describe the contours of a relational integration approach to the relationship between psychology and theology. This approach builds on the tradition of the integration of psychology and theology but thematizes relationality at the levels of both content and process. We argue that it is persons who seek to integrate (or not); thus, integration is a relational process that inevitably involves the challenges of conflict, power and control stances, and difference. Therefore, relational integration necessitates differentiated capacities for mutual recognition and collaboration across disciplinary differences. We contrast our differentiation-based approach to relational integration with other published views for relating psychology and theology and outline relational integration as (a) embodied and (b) hermeneutical.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Balswick

J. O.

, King

P. E.

, & Reimer

K. S.

(2005). The reciprocating self: Human development in theological perspective. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

Bauer

J. J.

, McAdams

D. P.

, & Sakaeda

A. R.

(2005). Interpreting the good life: Growth memories in the lives of mature, happy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 203–217.

Benjamin

(2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5–46.

Bobgan

, & Bobgan

(2012). Psychoheresy: The psychological seduction of Christianity (Rev. ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Eastgate.

Brown

J. K.

(2007). Scripture as communication: Introducing biblical hermeneutics. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

Brown

J. K.

(2010). Creation's renewal in the Gospel of John. Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 72, 275–290.

Brown

J. K.

, Corbin Reuschling

, & Dahl

C. M.

(2011). Becoming whole and holy: An integrative conversation about Christian formation. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos.

Brown

W. S.

, & Strawn

B. D.

(2012). The physical nature of Christian life: Neuroscience, psychology, and the church. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Browning

D. S.

, & Cooper

T. D.

(2004). Religious thought & the modern psychologies (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.

10.

Coe

J. H.

, & Hall

T. W.

(2010). A transformational psychology view. In Johnson

E. L.

(Ed.), Psychology & Christianity: Five views (2nd ed., pp. 199–226). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

11.

Collins

G. R.

(2000). An integration view. In Johnson

E.L.

, & Jones

S.L.

(Eds.), Psychology & Christianity: Four views (pp. 102–129). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

12.

Dawkins

(2006). The God delusion. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.

13.

Dueck

, & Reimer

(2009). A peaceable psychology: Christian therapy in a world of many cultures. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press.

14.

Enns

(2005). Inspiration and incarnation: Evangelicals and the problem of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

15.

Entwistle

D. N.

(2010). Integrative approaches to psychology and Christianity: An introduction to worldview issues, philosophical assumptions, and models of integration (2nd ed.). Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.

16.

Gadamer

H. G.

(1989). Truth and method (Rev. ed.; J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). London, UK: Continuum. (Original work published 1975)

17.

Green

J. B.

(2005). Body and soul, mind and brain: Critical issues. In Green

J. B.

, & Palmer

S. L.

(Eds.), In search of the soul: Four views of the mind-body problem (pp. 7–32). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

18.

Green

J. B.

(2007). Seized by truth: Reading the Bible as scripture. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.

19.

Grenz

(2006). The social God and the relational self: Toward a theology of the Imago Dei in the postmodern context. In Lints

, Horton

M. S.

, & Talbot

M. R.

(Eds.), Personal identity in theological perspective (pp. 70–92). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

20.

Hall

M. E.

, & Thoennes

(2006). At home in our bodies: Implications of the incarnation for embodiment and Christian higher education. Christian Scholar's Review, 36, 21–37.

21.

Hall

T. W.

, & Porter

S. L.

(2004). Referential integration: An emotional information processing perspective on the process of integration. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 32, 167–180.

22.

Hart

(1996). Faith thinking: The dynamics of Christian theology. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

23.

Hoffman

M. T.

(2011). Toward mutual recognition: Relational psychoanalysis and the Christian narrative. New York, NY: Routledge.

24.

Johnson

E. L.

(Ed.). (2010). Psychology & Christianity: Five views (2nd ed.). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

25.

Johnson

E. L.

, & Jones

S. L.

(Eds.). (2000). Psychology & Christianity: Four views. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

26.

Jones

S. L.

(2010). An integration view. In Johnson

E. L.

(Ed.), Psychology & Christianity: Five views (2nd ed., pp. 101–128). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

27.

Käsemann

(1971). Perspectives on Paul. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress.

28.

Kegan

(1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

29.

Kierkegaard

(1980). The sickness unto death: A Christian psychological exploration for upbuilding and awakening (H. V. Hong & E. H. Hong, Eds. & Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work 1849)

30.

King

M. L.

Jr. (1986a). The ethical demands for integration. In Washington

J. M.

(Ed.), A testament of hope: The essential writings and speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr. (pp. 117–125). New York, NY: HarperOne. (Original work published 1963)

31.

King

M. L.

Jr. (1986b). A testament of hope. In Washington

J. M.

(Ed.), A testament of hope: The essential writings and speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr. (pp. 313–330). New York, NY: HarperOne. (Original work published 1968)

32.

Labouvie-Vief

(2009). Cognition and equilibrium regulation in development and aging. Restorative Neurology & Neuroscience, 27(5), 551–565.

33.

LaCugna

C. M.

(1991). God for us: The Trinity and Christian life. New York, NY: HarperSanFranciso.

34.

Lewin

(1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

35.

Loder

J. E.

(1989). The transforming moment. Colorado Springs, CO: Helmers & Howard.

36.

Maddock

J. W.

, & Larson

N. R.

(2004). The ecological approach to incestuous families. In Catherall

D. R.

(Ed.), Handbook of stress, trauma, and the family (pp. 367–392). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.

37.

Majerus

, & Sandage

S. J.

(2010). Differentiation of self and Christian spiritual maturity: Social science and theological integration. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 38, 41–51.

38.

Mangis

M. W.

(1999). An alien horizon: The psychoanalytic contribution to a Christian hermeneutic of humility and confidence. Christian Scholar's Review, 28, 411–431.

39.

Mead

G. H.

(1913). The social self. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 10, 374–380.

40.

Murphy

(1990). Theology and the social sciences—Discipline and antidiscipline. Zygon, 25, 309–316.

41.

Myers

D. G.

(2010). A levels-of-explanation view. In Johnson

E. L.

(Ed.), Psychology & Christianity: Five views (2nd ed., pp. 199–226). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

42.

Ornstein

P. H.

(Ed.). (2011). The search for the self: Selected writings of Heinz Kohut: 1950–1978, Vol 1. London, UK: Karnac Books.

43.

Piaget

(1952). The child's concept of number. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

44.

Piedmont

, Williams

, & Ciarrocchi

(1997). Personality correlates of one's image of Jesus: Historiographic analysis using the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 25, 364–373.

45.

Porter

S. L.

(2010a). Theology as queen and psychology as handmaid: The authority of theology in integrative endeavors. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 29, 3–14.

46.

Porter

S. L.

(2010b). A reply to respondents of ‘Theology as queen and psychology as handmaid.’ Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 29, 33–40.

47.

Powlison

(2010). Biblical counseling response. In Johnson

E. L.

(Ed.), Psychology & Christianity: Five views (2nd ed., pp. 194–198). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

48.

Reno

R. R.

(2004). Biblical theology and theological exegesis. In Bartholomew

, Healy

, & Möller

(Eds.), Out of Egypt: Biblical theology and biblical interpretation (pp. 385–408). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

49.

Reynhout

K.A.

(2007). The hermeneutics of transdisciplinarity: A Gadamerian model of transversing reasoning. Transdisciplinarity in Science and Religion, 2, 77–101.

50.

Ricoeur

(1981). Hermeneutics & the human sciences (J. B. Thompson, Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

51.

Roberts

R. C.

(2000). A Christian psychology view. In Johnson

E. L.

, & Jones

S. L.

(Eds.), Psychology & Christianity: Four views (pp. 148–177). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

52.

Sandage

S. J.

, & Brown

J. K.

(2010). Monarchy or democracy in relational integration? A reply to Porter. Journal of Psychology & Christianity, 29, 20–26.

53.

Sandage

S. J.

, & Brown

J. K.

(2012). Converging horizons for relational integration: Differentiation-based collaboration. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 40, 72–76.

54.

Sandage

S. J.

, Cook

K. V.

, Hill

P. C.

, Strawn

B. D.

, & Reimer

K. S.

(2008). Hermeneutics and psychology: A review and dialectical model. Review of General Psychology, 12, 344–364.

55.

Sandage

S. J.

, & Jankowski

P. J.

(2013). Spirituality, social justice, and intercultural competence: Mediator effects for differentiation of self. International Journal for Intercultural Relations, 37, 366–374.

56.

Sandage

S. J.

, & Shults

F. L.

(2007). Relational spirituality and transformation: A relational integration model. Journal of Psychology & Christianity, 26, 261–269.

57.

Schnarch

D. M.

(2009). Intimacy and desire: Awaken the passion in your relationship. New York, NY: Beaufort Books.

58.

Shogren

G. S.

(2000). ‘Is the Kingdom of God about eating and drinking or isn't it?’ (Romans 14: 17). Novum Testamentum, 42, 238–56.

59.

Shults

F. L.

(2003). Reforming theological anthropology: After the philosophical turn to relationality. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

60.

Shults

F. L.

, & Sandage

S. J.

(2006). Transforming spirituality: Integrating theology and psychology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

61.

Siegel

D. J.

(2007). The mindful brain: Reflections on attunement in the cultivation of well-being. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.

62.

Siegler

R. S.

, & Chen

(2008). Differentiation and integration: Guiding principles for analyzing cognitive change. Developmental Science, 11, 433–448.

63.

Skowron

E. A.

, & Dendy

A. K.

(2004). Differentiation of self and attachment in adulthood: Relational correlates of effortful control. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 26, 337–357.

64.

Sorenson

R. L.

(1996). The tenth leper. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 24, 197–211.

65.

Sorenson

R. L.

, Derflinger

K. R.

, Bufford

R. K.

, & McMinn

M. M.

(2004). National collaborative research on how students learn integration: Final report. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 23, 355–365.

66.

Vanhoozer

K. J.

(2002). First theology: God, scripture and hermeneutics. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

67.

Volf

(1996). Exclusion & embrace: A theological exploration of identity, otherness, and reconciliation. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.

68.

Wolters

(2007). No longer queen: The theological disciplines and their sisters. In Jeffrey

D. L.

, & Evans

C. S.

(Eds.), The Bible and the university (pp. 59–79). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

69.

Worthington

E. L.

(1994). A blueprint for intradisciplinary integration. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 22, 79–86.

70.

Wright

, Jones

, & Strawn

B. D.

(2014). Tradition-based integration. In Bland

E. D.

, & Strawn

B. D.

(Eds.), Christianity and psychoanalysis: A new conversation (pp. 37–54). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.