Using Park’s meaning-making model to inform our understanding of distress in suffering, we conducted a qualitative investigation of the discrepancies experienced by evangelical Christian cancer patients between their religious global meaning and their situational meaning, and the religious beliefs invoked to resolve the discrepancy. Three primary research questions were addressed: (a) What kinds of tensions do evangelical Christians with a diagnosis of cancer experience between their religious global meaning system (i.e., beliefs) and their situational meaning, if any?; (b) Why may some experience tension while others may not?; and (c) How are tensions resolved if they arise? Twenty-nine evangelical Christians with cancer diagnoses were interviewed. Post hoc thematic analysis, informed by grounded theory was used to analyze the interviews. Roughly two-thirds of our sample denied experiencing any tension between their faith and their cancer experience. Protective factors included confidence in God and a spiritual kind of intellectual humility. Roughly one-third did indicate experiencing tension, which took the form of doubting God’s justice, love, existence, or answering of prayer. When these tensions were resolved, this resolution appeared to involve a kind of spiritual surrender, including acknowledgement of God’s control, humility before God, and relinquishing the assumption of a just world.
AiA. L.PetersonC.RodgersW.TiceT. N. (2005a). Effects of faith and secular factors on locus of control in middle-aged and older cardiac patients. Aging & Mental Health, 9(5), 470–481.
2.
AiA. L.PetersonC.RodgersW.TiceT. N. (2005b). Faith factors and internal health locus of control in patients prior to open-heart surgery. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(5), 669–676.
3.
BaumeisterR. F. (1991). Meaning of life. New York: Guilford Press.
4.
BlackH. K.RubinsteinR. L. (2004). Themes of suffering in later life. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 1, S17–S24.
5.
CalhounL. G.TedeschiR. G. (2006). The foundations of posttraumatic growth: An expanded framework. In CalhounL. G.TedeschiR. G. (Eds.) Handbook of Posttraumatic Growth (pp. 3–23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
7.
ColeB. S.PargamentK. I. (1999). Spiritual surrender: A paradoxical path to control. In MillerW. R. (Ed.), Integrating Spirituality into Treatment: Resources for Practitioners (pp. 179–198). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
8.
CookJ. A.WimberleyD. W. (1983). If I should die before I wake: Religious commitment and adjustment to the death of a child. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22(3), 222–238.
9.
CurrierJ. M.DrescherK. D.NieuwsmaJ. A.McCormickW. H. (2017). Theodicies and professional quality of life in a nationally representative sample of chaplains in the veterans’ health administration. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 45(4), 286–296.
10.
DaughertyT. K.WestA. M.WilliamsM. C.BrockmanJ. M. (2009). Measuring theodicy: Individual differences in the perception of divine intervention. Pastoral Psychology, 58, 43–47.
11.
DeinS.SwintonJ.AbbasS. Q. (2013). Theodicy and end-of-life care. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, 9, 191–208.
12.
DyslinC. W. (2008). The power of powerlessness: The role of spiritual surrender and interpersonal confession in the treatment of addictions. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 27(1), 41–55.
13.
EmmonsR. A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns: Motivation and spirituality in personality. New York: Guilford Press.
14.
ExlineJ. J.RoseE. D. (2013). Religious and spiritual struggles. In PaloutzianR. F.ParkC. L., (Eds.) Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality (2nd ed.) (pp. 380–398). New York: Guilford Press.
15.
FischerC.T. (2009). Bracketing in qualitative research: Conceptual and practical matters. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 583–590. doi:10.1080/10503300902798375.
16.
FurnhamA.BrownL. B. (1992). Theodicy: A neglected aspect of the psychology of religion. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(1), 37–45.
17.
GallT. L.BilodeauC. (2017). “Why me?”—Women’s use of spiritual causal attributions in making sense of breast cancer. Psychology & Health, 32(6), 709–727.
18.
GanzevoortR. R. (2009). “All things work together for good”? Theodicy and post-traumatic spirituality. In GräbW.CharbonnierL. (Eds.), Secularization theories, religious identity, and practical theology (pp. 183–192). Münster, Germany: LIT-Verlag.
19.
GeorgeL. S.ParkC. L. (2017). Does spirituality confer meaning in life among heart failure patients and cancer survivors?Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(1), 131–136.
20.
Hale-SmithA.ParkC. L.EdmondsonD. (2012). Measuring beliefs about suffering: Development of the views of suffering scale. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 855–866.
21.
HallM. E. L. (2016). Suffering in God’s presence: The role of lament in transformation. Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care, 9(2), 219–232.
22.
HallM. E. L.JohnsonE. (2001). Theodicy and therapy: Theological/philosophical contributions to the problem of suffering. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 20(1), 5–17.
23.
HallM. E. L.ShannonhouseL.AtenJ.McMartinJ.SilvermanE. (in press). The varieties of redemptive experiences: A study of meaning-making in evangelical Christian cancer patients. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.
24.
HoodR. W.Jr., HillP. C.WilliamsonW. P. (2005). The psychology of religious fundamentalism. New York: Guilford Press.
25.
HutsebautD. (2003). Theodicy models, religious coping strategies, self-image and post critical belief. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 24(1), 75–84.
26.
LeibnizG. W. (1951/1709). Theodicy (HuggardE. M., tr.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
27.
LevittH. M.MotulskyS. L.WertzF. J.MorrowS. L.PonterottoJ. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2–22.
28.
LoweryB. J.JacobsenB. S.DuCetteJ. (1993). Causal attribution, control, and adjustment to breast cancer. Psychosocial Oncology, 10(4), 37–53.
29.
MattisJ. S. (2002). Religion and spirituality in the meaning-making and coping experiences of African American women: A qualitative analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 309–321.
30.
MickleyJ. R.PargamentK. I.BrantC. R.HippK. M. (1998). God and the search for meaning among hospice caregivers. The Hospice Journal, 13(4), 1–17.
31.
MoschellaV. D.PressmanK. R.PressmanP.WeissmanD. E. (1997). The problem of theodicy and religious response to cancer. Journal of Religion and Health, 36(1), 17–20.
32.
NewtonT.McIntoshD. N. (2013). Unique contributions of religion to meaning. In HicksJ. A.RoutledgeC. (Eds.), The experience of meaning in life: Classical perspectives, emerging themes, and controversies (pp. 257–270). New York: Springer.
33.
PargamentK. I.DesaiK. M.McConnellK. M. (2006). Spirituality: A pathway to posttraumatic growth or decline? In CalhounL. G.TedeschiR. G. (Eds.), Handbook of posttraumatic growth (pp. 121–137). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
PargamentK. I.KoenigH. G.PerezL. M. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 519–543.
35.
ParkC. L. (2005). Religion as a meaning-making framework in coping with life stress. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 707–729. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00428.x.
36.
ParkC.L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. doi: 10.1037/a0018301.
37.
ParkC. L. (2011). Meaning and growth within positive psychology: Toward a more complete understanding. In SheldonK. M.KashdanT. B.StegerM. F. (Eds.), Designing positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 324–334). New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
ParkC. L. (2013). Religion and meaning. In PaloutzianR. F.ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.) (pp. 357–379). New York: Guilford Press.
39.
ParkC. L.FolkmanS. (1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 115–144.
40.
PiedmontR. L.WerdelM. B.DenekeE. (2009). An evaluation of Reinert’s Surrender Scale in an outpatient alcohol/other drug abuse treatment sample. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 27, 213–222.
ShawA.JosephS.LinleyP. A. (2005). Religion, spirituality, and posttraumatic growth: A systematic review. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 8(1), 1–11.
43.
SimkoC. (2012). Rhetorics of suffering:September11commemorations as theodicy. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 880–902.
44.
StumpE. (2010). Wandering in darkness: Narrative and the problem of suffering. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
TaylorE. J.OutlawF. H.BernardoT. R.RoyA. (1999). Spiritual conflicts associated with praying about cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 8, 386–394.
46.
WaltkeB. (2016). Finding the will of god: A pagan notion?(2nd ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
47.
WeegmannM.Piwowoz-HjortE. (2009). “Naught but a story”: Narratives of successful AA recovery. Health Sociology Review, 18, 273–283.
48.
WiltJ. A.ExlineJ. J.LindbergM. J.ParkC. L.PargamentK. I. (2017). Theological beliefs about suffering and interactions with the divine. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(2), 137–147.
49.
YoungL. B. (2013). Characteristics and practices of sponsored members of Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 8, 149–164.
