Compassionate theodicy (CT), recently theorized by Bethany Sollereder, proposes a new paradigm for evaluating theodicies based on their psychological utility for individuals who suffer. While CT suggests that theodicies can foster resilience, the cognitive processes underlying this effect remain unclear. This article addresses that gap by integrating Crystal Park’s Meaning-Making Model and Janoff-Bulman’s Shattered Assumptions Theory to explain how benevolent theodical beliefs may help restore meaning and coherence following trauma. Drawing on 14 empirical studies employing the Views of Suffering Scale, this review examines correlations between benevolent theodicies (e.g., Soul-Building, Providence, Suffering God) and psychological outcomes such as reduced distress, post-traumatic growth, and vocational satisfaction. Findings consistently support CT’s central claim that theodical beliefs play a constructive cognitive role in resilience and coping. By bridging empirical psychology and contemporary theology, this study shows how theodicies can contribute to processes of meaning restoration.
AdamsM. (1999). Horrendous evil and the goodness of God. Cornell University Press.
2.
Augustine. (2002). The confessions, revised (M. Boulding, Trans.; Vol. 1). New City Press.
3.
BockN. A.HallM. E. L.WangD. C.HallT. W. (2023). Spiritual self-awareness as a moderator between attachment to god and evangelical christians’ appraisals of suffering. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/scp0000223
4.
BonannoG. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events?American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20
5.
BoydG. A. (2000). God of the possible: A biblical introduction to the open view of God. Baker Books.
6.
CurrierJ. M.DrescherK. D.NieuwsmaJ. A.McCormickW. H. (2017). Theodicies and professional quality of life in a nationally representative sample of chaplains in the Veterans’ Health Administration. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 45(4), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2016.1197748
7.
DavisE. B.Van TongerenD. R.McElroy-HeltzelS. E.DavisD. E.RiceK. G.HookJ. N.AtenJ. D.ParkC. L.ShannonhouseL.LemkeA. W. (2021). Perceived and actual posttraumatic growth in religiousness and spirituality following disasters. Journal of Personality, 89(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12537
8.
EdmondsonD.ChaudoirS. R.MillsM. A.ParkC. L.HolubJ.BartkowiakJ. M. (2011). From shattered assumptions to weakened worldviews: Trauma symptoms signal anxiety buffer disruption. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 16(4), 358–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2011.572030
9.
EdwardsM. E.Van TongerenD. R. (2020). Meaning mediates the association between suffering and well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(6), 722–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1651890
10.
EngbersR. A.BekhetA. K.Jerofke-OwenT.JohnsonN. L.SinghM. (2024). Examining relationships among nursing students’ views of suffering, positive thinking, and professional quality of life. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 46(10), 744–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241273395
11.
ExlineJ. J.HallT. W.PargamentK. I.HarriottV. A. (2017). Predictors of growth from spiritual struggle among Christian undergraduates: Religious coping and perceptions of helpful action by God are both important. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(5), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1228007
12.
GeorgeL. S.ParkC. L. (2016). Meaning in life as comprehension, purpose, and mattering: Toward integration and new research questions. Review of General Psychology, 20(3), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000077
13.
GleesonA. (2015). On letting go of theodicy: Marilyn McCord Adams on God and evil. Sophia: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Metaphysical Theology and Ethics, 54(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-014-0431-3
14.
GriffioenA. L. (2018). Therapeutic theodicy? Suffering, struggle, and the shift from the God’s-eye view. Religions, 9(4), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9040099
15.
GutiérrezI. A.ParkC. L. (2014). Emerging adulthood, evolving worldviews: How life events impact college students’ developing belief systems. Emerging Adulthood, 2(3), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813519743
16.
HaginK. E. (1966). What faith is. Faith Library Publications.
17.
Hale-SmithA.ParkC. L.EdmondsonD. (2012). Measuring beliefs about suffering: Development of the Views of Suffering Scale. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 855–866. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027399
18.
HallM. E. L.McMartinJ.WangD.ShannonhouseL.AtenJ. D.SilvermanE. J.DeckerL. A. (2021). The christian sanctification of suffering scale: Measure development and relationship to well-being. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 24(8), 796–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2021.1884670
19.
HallM. E. L.McMartinJ.ParkC. L.SaccoS. J.KimD.KapicK.SilvermanE.ShannonhouseL.AtenJ.SnowL. M.LopezL. (2022). Suffering with Christ: Emic Christian coping and relation to well-being. SSM—Mental Health, 2, 100158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100158
20.
HarrisJ. I.UssetT.ChengZ. H. (2018). Theodicy and spiritual distress among veterans managing posttraumatic stress. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 5(4), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/scp0000170
21.
HickJ. (1966). Evil and the God of love. Macmillan.
22.
Janoff-BulmanR. (1989). Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: Applications of the schema construct. Social Cognition, 7(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1989.7.2.113
23.
Janoff-BulmanR. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. Free Press.
24.
KalerM. E.FrazierP. A.AndersS. L.TashiroT.TomichP.TennenH.ParkC. L. (2008). Assessing the psychometric properties of the World Assumptions Scale. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 21(3), 326–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20343
25.
KivistöS.PihlströmS. (2016). Kantian antitheodicy: Philosophical and literary varieties. Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
LambertJ. T.HartW. (2024). Psychology of theodicy. In ShackelfordT. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of religious psychology and behavior (pp. 1–9). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38971-9_1217-1
27.
LawrenceR. T. (1997). Measuring the image of God: The God Image Inventory and the God Image Scales. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 25(2), 214–226.
28.
LeoD.IzadikhahZ.FeinE. C.ForooshaniS. A. (2021). The effect of trauma on religious beliefs: A structured literature review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019834076
29.
MangelsdorfJ.EidM.LuhmannM. (2019). Does growth require suffering? A systematic review and meta-analysis on genuine posttraumatic and postecstatic growth. Psychological Bulletin, 145(3), 302–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000173
30.
McElroy-HeltzelS. E.DavisE. B.DavisD. E.AtenJ. D.Van TongerenD. R.HookJ. N.HwangJ. (2018). Benevolent theodicies protect against PTSD following a natural disaster. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 37(1), 6–16.
31.
McMartinJ.HallM. E. L. (2022). Christian functional views of suffering: A review and theoretical overview. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 25(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2021.1968812
ParkC. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001830
36.
ParkC. L. (2013). Trauma and meaning making: Converging conceptualizations and emerging evidence. In HicksJ. A.RoutledgeC. (Eds.), The experience of meaning in life: Classical perspectives, emerging themes, and controversies (pp. 61–76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6527-6_5
ParkC. L.GeorgeL. S. (2013). Assessing meaning making and its effects in the context of stressful life events: Measurement tools and methodological challenges. In WongP. T. P. (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 357–377). Routledge.
39.
ParkC. L.HallM. E. L.McMartinJ.SilvermanE. J.KapicK.ShannonhouseL.AtenJ. D. (2023). Religious affiliation moderates associations between theodicies and mental health in people experiencing significant suffering from bereavement, illness and other stressors. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2023.2268541
40.
ParkC. L.SilvermanE. J.SaccoS. J.KimD.HallM. E. L.McMartinJ.KapicK.ShannonhouseL.AtenJ. D.DavidA. B. (2023). When suffering contradicts belief: Measuring theodical struggling. Current Psychology, 43, 4961–4973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04642-w
41.
ParkesC. M. (1975). What becomes of redundant world models? A contribution to the study of adaptation to change. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 48(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1975.tb02315.x
42.
PerryJ.LeidenhagJ. (2023). Science-engaged theology. Cambridge University Press.
43.
PlantingaA. (1974). The nature of necessity. Oxford University Press.
SollerederB. N. (2021). Compassionate theodicy: A suggested truce between intellectual and practical theodicy. Modern Theology, 37(2), 382–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12688
46.
StumpE. (2010). Wandering in darkness: Narrative and the problem of suffering. Oxford University Press.
47.
TedeschiR. G.CalhounL. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.2490090305
48.
ThompsonN. J.FiorilloD.RothbaumB. O.ResslerK. J.MichopoulosV. (2018). Coping strategies as mediators in relation to resilience and posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 225, 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.049
49.
TilleyT. W. (2018). The evils of theodicy. In TrakakisN. N. (Ed.), The problem of evil: Eight views in dialogue (pp. 167–193). Oxford University Press.
50.
TrakakisN. N. (2018). Anti-theodicy. In TrakakisN. N. (Ed.), The problem of evil: Eight views in dialogue (pp. 211–241). Oxford University Press.
51.
VitaleV. R. (2020). Non-identity theodicy: A grace-based response to the problem of evil. In Non-identity theodicy (Chapter 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198864226.003.0001
52.
WangK. T.CowanK. J.ErikssonC. B.JanuzikM.ConantM. R. (2022). Religious views of suffering profile groups during COVID-19. Religions, 13(5), 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050453
53.
WiltJ. A.ExlineJ. J.GrubbsJ. B.ParkC. L.PargamentK. I. (2016). God’s role in suffering: Theodicies, divine struggle, and mental health. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 8(4), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000058
54.
WykstraS. J. (1984). The Humean obstacle to evidential arguments from suffering: On avoiding the evils of “appearance.”International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 16(2), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136567
55.
YanceyP. (1977). Where is God when it hurts? Zondervan.
