The Influence of Religious Orientation on Belief in Science,Religion,and the Paranormal

Abstract

This study examines the relationships among belief in science and in religion and various paranormal beliefs. Tobacyk and Milford (1983) included religious beliefs in a multidimensional scale of belief in the paranormal, reasoning that religion and the paranormal constitute one end of a bipolar dimension, while belief in science defines the other pole. The present study employed the Tobacyk and Milford scales, the Allport and Ross (1967) Religious Orientation Scale, and newly constructed scales of belief in science and astrology. These scales were administered to a total sample of 260 college undergraduates drawn from both a large church-owned university and from a large state university. It was found that religious orientation influenced reported belief in science, religion, and the paranormal. Traditional religious beliefs were not consistently related to paranormal beliefs. Religion and the paranormal do not seem to define one end of a science/paranormal belief continuum. It is argued that belief in religion, science, and the paranormal are three separate, independent dimensions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alcock

J. E.

(1981). Parapsychology: Science or magic? Elms-ford, NY: Pergamon.

Allport

, & Ross

J. M.

(1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.

Batson

C. D.

, & Ventis

W. L.

(1982). The religious experience: A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

Braude

S. E.

(1978). On the meaning of paranormal. In Ludwig

(Ed.), Handbook of parapsychology. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Brown

B. L.

, Icke

W. E.

, & Linker

G. A.

(in press). Measuring dyadic relationships: A demonstration using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. In Draper

T. W.

, & Marcos

A. C.

(Eds.), Family variables: Conceptualization, measurement, and use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Brown

B. L.

, Williams

R. N.

, & Barlow

C. D.

(1984). PRIFAC: A pascal factor analysis program. Journal of Pascal, Ada, and Modula-2, 3, 18–24.

Byrnes

J. F.

(1984). The psychology of religion. New York: Free Press.

Donahue

M. J.

(1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 400–419.

Ellison

C. W.

(1977). Christianity and psychology: Contradictory or complementary? In Malony

H. N.

(Ed.), Current perspectives in the psychology of religion (pp. 424–433). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

10.

Glock

C. Y.

, & Stark

(1965). Religion and society in tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.

11.

Polkinghorne

(1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

12.

Smart

(1976). The religious experience of mankind (2nd ed.). New York: Scribner's.

13.

Spilka

, Hood

R. W.

Jr. , & Gorsuch

R. L.

(1985). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

14.

Tobacyk

, & Milford

(1983). Belief in paranormal phenomena: Assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1029–1037.