The literature concerning personal values and professional practice is briefly reviewed. This project explored the relationship of values to nonclinical professional decisions in a nationwide survey of doctoral level psychologists. Respondents were sent a set of three vignettes (a Veterans Administration inservice summary, a state society presentation summary, and a publication abstract) and were asked to rate their approval of the vignette activities. The two sets were alike, except that one included statements inserted to reflect Christian values and the other included statements reflecting Humanist values. Humanist vignettes received significantly greater approval for all questions for all vignettes than did Christian vignettes. Overall, the publication abstract was rated as most approved and the inservice as least approved. Differential response patterns were much more apparent in the Christian vignettes and among several self-labeled groups. Methodological issues, the separation of church and state issue, the slippery slope hypothesis, as well as several specific professional implications are discussed. A structural pluralism is encouraged to avoid the apparent nontheistic basis in the nonclinical, professional decisions of psychologists.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (1981). Ethical principles of psychologists. American Psychologist, 36, 633–638.
2.
BerginA.E. (1980). Psychotherapy and religious values. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 95–105.
3.
BernardJ.L., MurphyM, & LittleM. (1987). The failure of clinical psychologists to apply understood ethical principles. Professional Psychology. Research and Practice, 18, 489–491.
4.
BoiceJ.M. (1978). The foundation of biblical authority.Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
5.
BurischM. (1984). Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of methods. American Psychologist, 39, 214–227.
6.
CeciS.J., PetersD., & PlotkinJ. (1985). Human subjects review, personal values, and the regulation of social science research. American Psychologist, 40, 994–1002.
7.
ClementP.W. (1978, June). Getting religion. APA Monitor. p. 2.
DunphyJ.J. (1983). A religion for a new age. The Humanist, 43(1), 23–26.
10.
EidsmoreJ. (1984). The Christian legal advisor.Milford, Ml: Mott Media.
11.
FisherK. (1986, May). In research: Having respect for the subject. APA Monitor, pp. 1, 34–35.
12.
GamierJ.D. (1982, August). Christians need not apply: Religious discrimination in clinical psychology graduate admissions. Presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Convention, Washington, D.C.
13.
GartnerJ. (1985). Religious prejudices in psychology: Theories of its cause and cure. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 4(1), 16–23.
14.
GartnerJ.D. (1986). Antireligious prejudice in admissions to doctoral programs in clinical psychology. Professional Psychology. Research and Practice, 17, 473–475.
15.
HaanN. (1982). Can research on morality be “scientific”?American Psychologist, 37, 1096–1104.
16.
HallN.F., & HallL.K.B. (1986). Is the war between science and religion over?The Humanist, 46, 26–28, 32.
17.
HerbsiebJ.D., SalesB.D., & OvercastT.D. (1985). Challenging licensure and certification. American Psychologist, 40, 1165–1178.
18.
HindsonE. (1979). Biblical view of man: The basis for confrontation. Journal of Pastoral Practice, 3(1), 33–58.
19.
The Holy Bible: New International Version. (1984). Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
20.
KellenbergerJ. (1985). The slippery slope of religious relativism. Religious Studies, 21, 39–52.
21.
KurtzP. (1983). In defense of secular humanism.Buffalo: Prometheus.
LarsonD.B., PattisonE.M., BlazerD.G., OmranA.R., & KaplanB.H. (1986). Systematic analysis of research on religious variables in four major psychiatric journals, 1978–1982. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 329–334.
24.
LarueG.A. (1984). The way of ethical humanism: A religion to meet the psychological needs of our time. The Humanist, 44(5), 20–25, 42.
25.
LearyD.E. (1980). The intentions and heritage of Descartes and Locke: Toward a recognition of the moral basis of modern psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 102, 283–310.
26.
LehrE., & SpilkaB. (1989). Religion in the introductory psychology textbook: A comparison of three decades. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 366–371.
27.
LewisK.N. (1984). Pretherapy value information: A safeguard for clients’ rights. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 3(3), 19–26.
28.
LoweC.M. (1969). Value orientation in counseling and psychotherapy.New York: Holt, Rhinehart, & Winston.
29.
MachenJ.C. (1923). Christianity and liberalism.Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
30.
MarxJ.H., & SprayS.L. (1969). Religious biographies and professional characteristics of psychotherapists. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 10, 275–278.
31.
McDowellJ., & StewartD. (1983). Handbook of today's religions.San Bernardino, CA: Here's Life.
32.
McQuilkenR.J. (1977). The behavioral sciences under the authority of Scripture. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society20(1), 32–43.
33.
MeyerM.S. (1988). Ethical principles of psychologists and religious diversity. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 486–488.
34.
MurrayJ. (1955). Redemption: Accomplished and applied.Grand Rapids: Ferdmans.
35.
NesbittR., & RossL. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgement.Inglewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
36.
NeumannJ.K. (1986). The American Psychological Association and value pluralism. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 14, 185–193.
37.
NeumannJ.K. (1988). Licensing of health care professionals from a biblical perspective. Journal of Biblical Ethics in Medicine, 2, 21–26.
38.
NeumannJ.K. (1989). A theological perspective in the licensing of helping professionals. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 17, 252–262.
39.
NeumannJ.K., ThompsonW., & WoolleyT.W. (1986, August 3). Values and professional decision making. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Convention, Washington, D.C.
40.
NightingaleE.J. (Ed.). (1983). Directory of psychology staffing and services.Danville, IL: Veterans Administration Medical Center.
41.
PiersmaH.L. (1988, November). Securing accreditation for a psychology internship at a Christian institution. Paper presented at the International Congress of Christian Counseling, Atlanta, GA.
42.
PulliamR. (1985). The church and the state. The Presbyterian Journal, 44, 12–13.
43.
RaganC., MalonyH.N., & Beit-HallahmiB. (1980). Psychologists and religion: Professional factors and personal belief. Review of Religious Research, 21, 208–217.
44.
RubleR. (1985). How introductory psychology text books treat religion. Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, 37, 180–182.
45.
SchaefferF.A. (1978). The God who is there.Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.
46.
SchaefferF.A. (1981). A Christian manifesto.Westchester, IL: Crossway.
47.
SchweigerdtB. (1982). The gnostic influence on psychology: Effects on the common heresy. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 10, 221–229.
48.
SpenceK. (1985). In defense of public Christianity. The Presbyterian Journal, 44, 10–11.
49.
VitzP.C. (1981). From a secular to a Christian psychology. In WilliamsonP., & PerrottaK. (Eds.), Christianity confronts modernity (pp. 121–149). Ann Arbor, MI: Servant.
50.
VitzP.C. (1984). A covenant theory of personality: A theoretical introduction. In MorrisL. (Ed.), The Christian vision: Man in society (pp. 75–99). Hillsdale, MI: The Hillsdale College Press.
51.
WoodbridgeJ.D. (1982). Biblical authority: A critique of the Rogers/McKim proposal.Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
