It has been hypothesized that the online medium and the Internet lower search costs and that electronic markets are more competitive than conventional markets. This suggests that price dispersion of an item with the same measured characteristics across sellers at a given point in time for identical products sold by e-tailers online should be smaller than it is offline, but some recent empirical evidence reveals the opposite. Based on an empirical analysis of 105 e-tailers comprising 6,739 price observations for 581 items in eight product categories, the authors show that online price dispersion is persistent, even after controlling for e-tailer heterogeneity. The general conclusion is that the proportion of the price dispersion explained by e-tailer characteristics is small. Also, after controlling for differences in e-tailer service quality, prices at pure-play e-tailers are equal to or lower than those at bricks-andclicks e-tailers for all categories except books and computer software.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, Joseph. 1998. “Intermediation and Electronic Markets: Aggregation and Pricing in Internet Commerce”. Doctoral dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Baye, Michael R. and John Morgan. 2001. “Price Dispersion in the Lab and on the Internet: Theory and Evidence”. Working Paper. Indiana University.
4.
Betancourt, Roger R.
and David Gautschi. 1993. “Two Essential Characteristics of Retail Markets and Their Economic Consequences”. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization21 (August): 277-294.
5.
Brash, Joanna
, Blair Crawford, and Chris Grosso. 2000. “How e-Tailing Can Rise From the Ashes”. McKinsey Quarterly3: 98-109.
6.
Brynjolfsson, Erik
and Michael Smith. 2000. “Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers”. Management Science46 (April): 563-585.
7.
Burdett, Kenneth
and Melvyn Coles. 1997. “Steady State Price Distributions in a Noisy Search Equilibrium”. Journal of Economic Theory72 (January): 1-32.
Carlson, John
and Preston McAfee. 1983. “Discrete Equilibrium Price Dispersion”. Journal of Political Economy91 (June): 480-493.
10.
Clemons, Eric, Il-Horn Hann
, and Lorin Hitt. 2002. “Price Dispersion and Differentiation in Online Travel: An Empirical Investigation”. Management Science48 (4): 534-549.
Dahlby, Bev
and Douglas West. 1986. “Price Dispersion in an Automobile Insurance Market”. Journal of Political Economy94 (April): 418-438.
13.
Degeratu, Alex M.
, Arvind Rangaswamy, and Jinan Wu. 2000. “Consumer Choice Behavior in Online and Traditional Supermarkets: The Effects of Brand Name, Price, and Other Search Attributes”. International Journal of Research in Marketing17 (1): 55-78.
14.
Ehrlich, Isaac
and Lawrence Fisher. 1982. “The Derived Demand for Advertising: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation”. American Economic Review72 (June): 366-388.
15.
Erevelles, S., E. Rolland, and S. Srinivasan. 2001. “Are Prices Really Lower on the Internet? An Analysis of the Vitamin Industry”. Working Paper. University of California, Riverside.
16.
Fishman, Arthur
. 1992. “Search Technology, Staggered Price-Setting, and Price Dispersion”. American Economic Review82 (March): 287-298.
17.
Pan, Xing, Brian T. Ratchford, and Venkatesh Shankar. 2001. “Why Aren’t the Prices of the Same Item the Same at Me.com and You.com? Drivers of Price Dispersion Among E-Tailers”. Working Paper. University of Maryland, College Park.
18.
Ratchford, Brian T., Xing Pan, and Venkatesh Shankar. 2002. “On the Efficiency of Electronic Markets for Consumers”. Working Paper. University of Maryland, College Park.
19.
Ratchford, Brian T.
and Glenn T. Stoops. 1988. “A Model and Measurement Approach for Studying Retail Products”. Journal of Retailing64 (3): 241-263.
20.
Rosen, Sherwin
. 1974. “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition”. Journal of Political Economy82 (1): 34-55.
21.
Salop, Steven
and Joseph Stiglitz. 1982. “The Theory of Sales: A Simple Model of Equilibrium Price Dispersion With Identical Agents”. American Economic Review72 (December): 1121-1130.
22.
Shankar, Venkatesh
, Gregory Carpenter, and Lakshman Krishnamurthi. 1999. “The Advantages of Entering in the Growth Stage of the Product Life Cycle: An Empirical Analysis”. Journal of Marketing Research36 (May): 269-276.
23.
Shankar, Venkatesh, Arvind Rangaswamy, and Michael Pusateri. 2001. “The Online Medium and Customer Price Sensitivity”. Working Paper. University of Maryland, College Park.
24.
Shankar, Venkatesh, Fareena Sultan, Glen L. Urban, and Iakov Bart. 2002. “The Role of Trust in Online Customer Support”. Working Paper. Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
25.
Shankar, Venkatesh, Glen L. Urban, and Fareena Sultan. 2002. “Trust and e-Business Strategy”. Working Paper. Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
26.
Smith, Michael
, Joseph Bailey, and Erik Brynjolfsson. 2000. “Understanding Digital Markets: Review and Assessment”. In Understanding the Digital Economy. Eds. Erik Brynjolfsson and Brian Kahin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Smith, Michael
and Erik Brynjolfsson. 2001. “Consumer Decision-Making at an Internet Shopbot”. Journal of Industrial Economics49 (4): 541-558.
28.
Stigler, George
. 1961. “The Economics of Information”. Journal of Political Economy69 (June): 213-225.
29.
Sultan, Fareena, Glen L. Urban, Venkatesh Shankar, and Iakov Bart. 2002. “Determinants and Consequences of Trust in E-Business”. Working Paper. Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
30.
Urban, Glen L.
, Fareena Sultan, and William Qualls. 2000. “Making Trust the Center of Your Internet Strategy”. Sloan Management Review, Fall, 39-48.
