This research examines the role of team-based superordinate identity in influencing new product performance. The author also studies how several team-related factors affect superordinate identity and, through this psychological bond, influence new product performance. The findings, based on a sample of 118 teams, reveal that superordinate identity indeed enhances the performance of the new product developed by a team. Traditional group factors such as task interdependence and physical proximity do not play any role in influencing either superordinate identity or new product performance. Team longevity improves superordinate identity but has no effect on new product performance. Instead, a special team structure (i.e., high autonomy and outcome interdependence) improves both superordinate identity and new product performance. If interdepartmental connectedness in the firm is high, there is a reduced need for high autonomy in the team. Finally, the characteristics of the special team structure influence new product performance only through superordinate identity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aiken, Leona S.
and Stephen G. West. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Armstrong, J. Scott
and Terry S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.”Journal of Marketing Research14 (August): 396-402.
3.
Ashforth, Blake, E.
and Fred Mael. 1989. “Social Identity Theory and the Organization.”Academy of Management Review14 (January): 20-39.
4.
Ashforth, Blake, E.
and Fred Mael. 1996. “Organizational Identity and Strategy as a Context for the Individual.” In Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 13. Eds. Joel Baum and Jane Dutton. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 19-64.
5.
Baron, Reuben M.
and David A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51 (December): 1173-1182.
6.
Berger, Peter L.
and Thomas Luckman. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin.
7.
Brewer, Marilynn B.
and Norman Miller. 1984. “Beyond the Contact Hypothesis: Theoretical Perspectives on Desegregation.” In Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation. Eds. Norman Miller and Marilynn B. Brewer. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 281-302.
8.
Cini, Marie A.
, Richard L.Moreland, and John M. Levine. 1993. “Group Staffing Levels and Response to Prospective and New Group Members.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology65 (October): 723-734.
9.
Clark, Kim B.
and Takahiro Fujimoto. 1991. Product Development Performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
10.
Clark, Kim B.
and Steven C. Wheelwright. 1992. “Organizing and Leading Heavyweight Development Teams.”California Management Review34 (Spring): 9-28.
11.
Cohen, Susan G.
and Diane E. Bailey. 1997. “What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research From the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite.”Journal of Management23 (3): 239-290.
12.
Cook, John D.
, Susan Hepworth, Toby D. Wall, and Peter B. Warr. 1981. The Experience of Work. New York: Academic Press.
13.
Deshpandé, Rohit
and Gerald Zaltman. 1982. “Factors Affecting the Use of Market Information: A Path Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research21 (February): 14-31.
14.
Dougherty, Deborah
. 1990. “Understanding New Markets for New Products.”Strategic Management Journal11 (Summer): 59-78.
15.
Dougherty, Deborah
. 1992. “Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Organizations.”Organization Science3 (May): 179-202.
16.
Dougherty, Deborah
and Trudy Heller. 1994. “The Illegitimacy of Successful Product Innovation in Established Firms.”Organization Science5 (May): 200-218.
17.
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.
and Behnam N. Tabrizi. 1995. “Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Industry.”Administrative Science Quarterly40 (March): 84-110.
18.
Fisher, Robert J.
, Elliot Maltz, and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1997. “Enhancing Communication Between Marketing and Engineering: The Moderating Role of Relative Functional Identification.”Journal of Marketing61 (July): 54-70.
19.
Ford, Robert C.
and W. Alan Randolph. 1992. “Cross-Functional Structures: A Review and Integration of Matrix Organization and Project Management.”Journal of Management18 (June): 267-294.
20.
Forsyth, Donelson R.1990. Group Dynamics. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
21.
Gaertner, Samuel L.
, Jeffrey Mann, John F. Dovidio, Audrey Murrell, and Marina Pomare. 1990. “How Does Cooperation Reduce Intergroup Bias?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59 (October): 692-704.
22.
Galbraith, Jay
. 1973. Designing Complex Organization. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23.
Gregory, Kathleen1983. “Native-View Paradigms: Multiple Cultures and Culture Conflicts in Organizations.”Administrative Science Quarterly28 (September): 369-278.
24.
Griffin, Abbie
and John Hauser. 1996. “Integration of R&D and Marketing: A Review and Analysis of the Literature.”Journal of Product Innovation Management13 (May): 191-215.
25.
Gupta, Ashok K.
, S. P. Raj, and David Wilemon. 1986. “A Model for Studying R&D-Marketing Interface in the Product Development Process.”Journal of Marketing50 (April): 7-17.
26.
Gupta, Ashok K.
and David Wilemon. 1988. “Why R&D Resists Using Marketing Information.”Research Technology Management31 (November/December): 36-41.
27.
Hameri, Ari Pekka
and Jukka Nihitila. 1997. “Distributed New Product Development Project Based on Internet and World-Wide Web: A Case Study.”Journal of Product Innovation Management14 (March): 77-87.
28.
Hamilton, David L.1981. Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Hinkle, Steve
, Laurie A. Taylor, D. Lee Fox-Cardamone, and Kimberly F. Crook. 1989. “Intragroup Identification, and Intergroup Differentiation: A Multicomponent Approach.”British Journal of Social Psychology28: 305-317.
30.
Hutt, Michael
. 1995. “Cross-Functional Working Relationship in Marketing.”Journal of Academy of Marketing Science23 (Fall): 351-357.
31.
Jaccard, James
, Choi K. Wan, and Robert Turrisi. 1990. “The Detection and Interpretation of Interaction Effects Between Continuous Variables in Multiple Regression.”Multivariate Behavioral Research25 (October): 467-478.
32.
Jaworski, Bernard J.
and Ajay K. Kohli. 1993. “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing57 (July): 53-70.
33.
Johnson, David W.
, Roger T. Johnson, and Geoffrey Maruyama. 1983. “Interdependence and Interpersonal Attraction Among Heterogenous and Homogenous Individuals: A Theoretical Formulation and a Meta-Analysis of the Research.”Review of Education and Research53 (1): 5-54.
34.
Johnson, David W.
, Roger T. Johnson, and Mary Beth Stanne. 1989. “Impact of Goal and Resource Interdependence on Problem-Solving Success.”Journal of Social Psychology129 (May): 621-629.
35.
Kahn, Kenneth B.1996. “Interdepartmental Integration: A Definition With Implications for Product Development Performance.”Journal of Product Innovation Management13: 137-151.
36.
Kahn, Kenneth B
and Edward McDonough, III. 1997. “An Empirical Study of the Relationships Among Co-Location, Integration, and Performance, and Satisfaction.”Journal of Product Innovation Management14 (3): 161-178.
37.
Katz, Ralph
. 1982. “The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance.”Administrative Science Quarterly27 (March): 81-104.
38.
Keller, Robert T.1986. “Predictors of the Performance of Project Groups in R&D Organizations.”Academy of Management Journal29 (December): 715-726.
39.
Leavitt, Harold J.
and Jean Lipman-Blumen. 1995. “Hot Groups.”Harvard Business Review73 (July/August): 109-116.
40.
Mackie, Diane M.
and George R. Goethals. 1987. “Individual and Group Goals.” In Review of Personality and Social Psychology. Ed. C. Hendrick. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 144-166.
41.
Mael, Fred
and Blake E. Ashforth. 1992. “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification.”Journal of Organizational Behavior13 (March): 103-123.
42.
Maltz, Elliot
and Ajay K. Kohli. 1996. “Market Intelligence Dissemination Across Functional Boundaries.”Journal of Marketing Research33 (February): 47-61.
43.
Pinto, Mary Beth
, Jeffery K. Pinto, and John E. Prescott. 1993. “Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-Functional Cooperation.”Management Science39 (October): 1281-1297.
44.
Ruekert, Robert W.
and Orville C. Walker, Jr.1987. “Marketing’s Interaction With Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence.”Journal of Marketing51 (January): 1-19.
45.
Sethi, Rajesh
. 2000. “New Product Quality and Product Development Teams.”Journal of Marketing64 (April): 1-14.
46.
Sherif, Muzafer
and Carolyn W. Sherif. 1969. Social Psychology.New York: Harper & Row.
47.
Tajfel, Henri
. 1982. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.”Annual Review of Psychology33: 1-39.
48.
Takeuchi, Hirotaka
and Ikujiro Nonaka. 1986. “The New New Product Development Game.”Harvard Business Review64 (January/February): 137-146.
49.
Tuckman, Bruce W.1965. “Developmental Sequences in Small Groups.”Psychological Bulletin63: 384-399.
50.
Wageman, Ruth
. 1995. “Interdependence and Group Effectiveness.”Administrative Science Quarterly40 (March): 145-180.
51.
Wheelwright, Steven C.
and Kim B. Clark. 1992. Revolutionizing Product Development. New York: Free Press.
52.
Wilder, David A.1986. “Social Categorization: Implications for Creation and Reduction of Intergroup Bias.”Advances in Experimental Psychology19: 291-355.
53.
Zaltman, Gerald
, Robert Duncan, and Jonny Holbeck. 1973. Innovations and Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
