The Moderating Role of the Price Frame on the Effects of Price Range and the Number of Competitors on Consumers' Search Intentions

Abstract

The Internet and Internet shopping agents (ISAs) are likely to have a substantial impact on the way consumers shop and conduct price searches. This article examines how the price frame (the relative position of a retailer's price presented by ISAs) moderates the effects of the price range and the number of competitors carrying a product on Consumers' search intentions. Building on prospect theory and range theory, the authors predicted that the effects of price range and the number of competitors on Consumers' search intentions would be more pronounced in a negative price frame than in a positive price frame. The results of two experiments provide support for these predictions.

Keywords

shopping bot price dispersion Internet shopping agent search intentions price range prospect theory range theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adaval, Rashmi and Kent B. Monroe . 2002. “Automatic Construction and Use of Contextual Information for Product and Price Evaluations.” Journal of Consumer Research 28 (March): 572-588.

Beatty, Sharon E. and Scott M. Smith . 1987. “External Search Efforts: An Investigation across Several Product Categories.” Journal of Consumer Research 14 (June): 83-95.

Brynjolfsson, Erik and Michael D. Smith . 2000. “Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers.” Management Science 46 (4): 563-585.

Cooke, Alan D. J. , Harish Sujan , Mita Sujan , and Barton A. Weitz . 2002. “Marketing the Unfamiliar: The Role of Context and Item-Specific Information in Electronic Agent Recommendations.” Journal of Marketing Research 39 (November): 488-497.

Dodds, William B. , Kent B. Monroe , and Dhruv Grewal . 1991. “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations.” Journal of Marketing Research 28 (August): 307-319.

Grewal, Dhruv , Jerry Gotlieb , and Howard Marmorstein . 1994. “The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-Perceived Risk Relationship.” Journal of Consumer Research 21 (June): 145-153.

Grewal, Dhruv and Howard Marmorstein . 1994. “Market Price Variation, Perceived Price Variations, and Consumers' Price Search Decisions for Durable Goods.” Journal of Consumer Research 21 (December): 453-460.

Grewal, Dhruv , Kent B. Monroe , and R. Krishnan . 1998. “The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers' Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions.” Journal of Marketing 62 (April): 46-59.

Inman, J. Jeffrey , Anil C. Peter , and Priya Raghubir . 1997. “Framing the Deal: The Role of Restrictions in Accentuating Deal Value.” Journal of Consumer Research 24 (June): 68-77.

10.

Janiszewski, Chris and Donald R. Lichtenstein . 1999. “A Range Theory Account of Price Perception.” Journal of Consumer Research 25 (March): 353-368.

11.

Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky . 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (March): 263-291.

12.

Lal, Rajiv and Miklos Sarvary . 1999. “When and How Is the Internet Likely to Decrease Price Competition?” Marketing Science 18 (4): 485-503.

13.

Levin, Irwin P. , Sandra L. Schneider , and Gary J. Gaeth . 1998. “All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76 (November): 149-188.

14.

Maheshwaran, Durairaj and Joan Meyers-Levy . 1990. “The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement.” Journal of Marketing Research 27 (August): 361-367.

15.

Marmorstein, Howard , Dhruv Grewal , and Raymond P. H. Fishe . 1992. “The Value of Time Spent in Price-Comparison Shopping: Survey and Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Consumer Research 19 (June): 52-61.

16.

Monroe, Kent B. 2003. Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions. 3d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

17.

Putrevu, Sanjay and Brian T. Ratchford . 1997. “A Model of Search Behavior With an Application to Grocery Shopping.” Journal of Retailing 23 (Winter): 463-487.

18.

Rajendran, K. N. and Gerard J. Tellis . 1994. “Contextual and Temporal Components of Reference Price.” Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 22-34.

19.

Ratchford, Brian T. and Narasimhan Srinivasan . 1993. “An Empirical Investigation of Returns to Search.” Marketing Science 12 (Winter): 73-87.

20.

Roggeveen, Anne, Dhruv Grewal, and Jerry Gotlieb. 2005. Does the Frame of a Comparative Ad Moderate the Effectiveness of Extrinsic Information Cues? A Re-Inquiry. Unpublished working paper, Babson College.

21.

Tang, Fang-Fang and Xiaolin Xing . 2001. “Will the Growth of Multi-Channel Retailing Diminish the Pricing Efficiency of the Web?” Journal of Retailing 77 (Fall): 319-323.

22.

Urbany, Joel E. , Peter R. Dickson , and Rosemary Kalapurakal . 1996. “Price Search in Retail Grocery Market.” Journal of Marketing 60 (April): 91-104.