This research explores the influence of mass media use and community context on civic engagement. The article presents a multilevel test of print, broadcast, and Internet effects on interpersonal trust and civic participation that acknowledges there are (a) micro-level differences in the motives underlying media use, (b) age-cohort differences in patterns of media use and levels of civic engagement, and (c) macro-level differences in community / communication context. Accordingly, the effects of individual differences in media use and aggregate differences in community context are analyzed within generational subsamples using a pooled data set developed from the 1998 and 1999 DDB Life Style Studies. The data suggest that informational uses of mass media are positively related to the production of social capital, whereas social-recreational uses are negatively related to these civic indicators. Informational uses of mass media were also found to interact with community context to influence civic engagement. Analyses within subsamples find that among the youngest adult Americans, use of the Internet for information exchange more strongly influences trust in people and civic participation than do uses of traditional print and broadcast news media.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almond, G. A.
, & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
Almond, G. A.
, & Verba, S. (Eds.). (1980). The civic culture revisited. Boston: Little, Brown.
3.
Anderson, B.
(1991). Imagined communities. New York: Verso.
4.
Anderson, C. J.
(1996). Political action and social integration. American Politics Quarterly, 24, 105-124.
5.
Ball-Rokeach, S. J.
(1985). The origins of individual media systems dependency: A sociological framework. Communication Research, 12, 485-510.
6.
Ball-Rokeach, S. J.
(1998). A theory of media power and a theory of media use: Different stories, questions, and ways of thinking. Mass Communication and Society, 1(½), 5-40.
7.
Ball-Rokeach, S. J.
, Kim, Y.-C., & Matei, S. (2001). Storytelling neighborhood: Paths to belonging in diverse urban environments. Communication Research, 28(4), 392-428.
8.
Bimber, B.
(1998). The Internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31, 133-160.
9.
Blau, P. M.
(1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.
10.
Blau, P. M.
(1994). Structural contexts of opportunities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Blumler, J.
, & Katz, E. (Eds.). (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Brehm, J.
, & Rahn, W. M. (1997). Individual level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999-1023.
13.
Cappella, J. N.
, Lee, G., & Southwell, B. (1997, May). The effects of news and entertainment on interpersonal trust: Political talk radio, newspapers, and television. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
14.
Chaffee, S.
, & Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to news media. Human Communication Research, 13, 76-107.
15.
Coleman, J.
(1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Corrado, A.
, & Firestone, C. M. (1996). Elections in cyberspace: Toward a new era in American politics. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
17.
Davidson, W. B.
, & Cotter, P. R. (1989) Sense of community and political participation. Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 119-125.
18.
Davis, R.
(1999). The web of politics: The Internet's impact on the American political system. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
DiPasquale, D.
, & Glaeser, E. (1999). Incentives and social capital: Are home-owners better citizens?Journal of Urban Economics, 45, 354-385.
20.
Durkheim, E.
(1995). The elementary forms of religious life. (K. E. Fields, Trans.). New York: Free Press.
21.
Erickson, B. H.
, & Nosanchuk, T. A. (1990). How an apolitical association politicizes. Canadian Review of Sociology & Anthropology, 27, 206-219.
22.
Fischer, C. S.
(1982). Two dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Flanagan, C. A.
, & Sherrod, L. R. (1998). Youth political development: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 447-456.
24.
Friedland, L. A.
(2001). Communication, community, and democracy: Toward a theory of the communicatively integrated community. Communication Research, 28(4), 358-391.
25.
Friedland, L. A.
, & McLeod, J. M. (1999). Community integration and mass media: A reconsideration. In D. Demers & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Mass media, social control, and social change (pp. 197-226). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
26.
Fukuyama, F.
(1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
27.
Galaskiewicz, J.
(1979). Exchange networks and community politics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
Gerbner, G.
, Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The “mainstreaming of America: Violence profile No. 11. Journal of Communication, 30, 10-29.
29.
Graber, D. A.
(1993). Mass media and American politics (3rd ed.). Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
30.
Groeneman, S.
(1994, May). Multi-purpose household panels and general samples: How similar and how different? Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Danvers, MA.
31.
Habermas, J.
(1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon.
32.
Hawkins, R. P.
, & Pingree, S. (1981). Uniform messages and habitual viewing: Unnecessary assumptions in social reality effects. Human Communication Research, 7, 291-301.
33.
Huckfeldt, R.
(1979). Political participation and the neighborhood social context. American Journal of Political Science, 23, 579-592.
34.
Huckfeldt, R.
, Beck, P. A., Dalton, R. J., & Levine, J. (1995). Political environments, cohesive social groups, and the communication of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 1025-1054.
35.
Inglehart, R.
(1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 countries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
Iversen, G. R.
(1991). Contextual analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
Jones, S. G.
(1995). Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Jung, J.-Y.
, Qiu, J. L., & Kim, Y.-C. (2001). Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the “divide.”Communication Research, 28(4), 509-537.
39.
Kaniss, P.
(1991). Making local news. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Kasarda, J.
, & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39, 328-339.
41.
Katz, E.
, & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communication (pp. 19-32). London: Faber.
42.
Katz, J. E.
, & Aspden, P. (1997). A nation of strangers?Communications of the ACM, 40, 81-86.
43.
Kern, M.
(1997). Social capital and citizen interpretation of political ads, news, and Web site information in the 1996 presidential election. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1238-1250.
44.
Kraut, R.
, Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031.
45.
Laumann, E. O.
, & Pappi, F. U. (1976). Networks of collective action: A perspective on community influence systems. New York: Academic Press.
46.
Loury, G. C.
(1977). The dynamic theory of racial income differences. In P. A. Wallace (Ed.), Women, minorities, and employment discrimination (pp. 153-186). Lexington, MA: Heath.
47.
Loury, G. C.
(1987). Why should we care about group inequality?Social Philosophy & Policy, 5, 249-271.
48.
McLeod, J. M.
(2000). Media and civic socialization. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27(2), 45-51.
49.
McLeod, J. M.
, & Becker, L. B. (1974). Testing the validity of gratification measures through political effects analysis. In J. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communication (pp. 137-164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
50.
McLeod, J. M.
, & Becker, L. B. (1981). The uses and gratification approach. In D. D. Nimmo & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of political communication (pp. 67-100). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
51.
McLeod, J. M.
, Becker, L. B., & Byrnes, J. (1974). Another look at the agenda setting function of the press. Communication Research, 1, 131-166.
52.
McLeod, J. M.
, Daily, K., Guo, Z., Eveland, W. P., Jr., Bayer, J., Yang, S., & Wang, H. (1996). Community integration, local media use and democratic processes. Communication Research, 23, 179-209.
53.
McLeod, J. M.
, Glynn, C. J., & McDonald, D. G. (1983). Issues and images: The influence of media reliance in voting decisions. Communication Research, 10, 37-58.
54.
McLeod, J. M.
, Pan, Z., & Rucinski, D. (1995). Levels of analysis in public opinion research. In T. Glasser & C. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 55-85). New York: Guilford.
55.
McLeod, J. M.
, Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, & participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315-336.
56.
McQuail, D.
(1985). Gratifications research and media theory: Four models or one. In K.K.E. Rosengren, P. Palmgren, & L. Wenner (Eds.), Media gratification research: Current perspectives (pp. 149-167). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
57.
McQuail, D.
(1987). The functions of communication: A non-functionalist overview. In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 327-346). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
58.
Moy, P.
, Scheufele, D. A., & Holbert, R. L. (1999). Television use and social capital: Testing Putnam's time displacement hypothesis. Mass Communication & Society, 2(112), 25-43.
59.
Mullen, B.
(1991). Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 297-323.
60.
Nie, N., & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report [Online]. Available: http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/Press_Release/internetStudy.html
61.
Norris, P.
(1996). Does television erode social capital? A reply to Putnam. PS: Political Science & Politics, 293, 474-480.
62.
Norris, P.
(1998). Virtual democracy. Harvard International Journal of Press / Politics, 3, 1-4.
63.
Ostrom. E.
(1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
Pan, Z.
, & McLeod, J. M. (1991). Multi-level analysis in mass communication research. Communication Research, 18, 140-173.
65.
Pavlik, J. V.
(1996). New media technology: Cultural and commercial perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
66.
Peiser, W.
(2000). Cohort replacement and the downward trend in newspaper readership. Newspaper Research Journal, 21, 11-23.
67.
Putnam, R. D.
(1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68.
Putnam, R. D.
(1995a). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.
69.
Putnam, R. D.
(1995b). Tuning in, tuning out the strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 284, 664-683.
70.
Putnam, R. D.
(2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
71.
Putnam, R.
, & Yonish, S. (1999, May). How important are random samples? Some surprising new evidence. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St. Pete Beach, FL.
72.
Rahn, W. M.
, & Transue, J. E. (1998). Social trust and value change: The decline of social capital in American youth, 1976-1995. Political Psychology, 19, 545-565.
73.
Rheingold, H.
(1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. New York: HarperCollins.
74.
Rosengren, K. E.
, Palmgren, P., & Wenner, L. (Eds.). (1985). Media gratification research: Current perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
75.
Sampson, R. J.
(1988). Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model. American Sociological Review, 53(5). 766-779.
76.
Scheufele, D. A.
, & Shah, D. V. (2000). Personality strength and social capital: The role of dispositional and informational variables in the production of civic participation. Communication Research, 27, 107-131.
77.
Scholz, J. T.
, & Lubell, M. (1998). Trust and taxpaying: Testing the heuristic approach to collective action. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 398-417.
78.
Scholz, J. T.
, & Pinney, N. (1995). Duty, fear, and tax compliance: The heuristic basis of citizenship behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 490-512.
79.
Shah, D. V.
(1998). Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: An individual level assessment of social capital. Political Psychology, 19, 469-496.
80.
Shah, D. V. (2000). Digital media in America: Preferences, practices, and policy implications [Online]. Available: http://www.cpn.org/papers/papers.html
81.
Shah, D. V.
, Holbert, R. L., & Kwak, N. (1999, August). Expanding the “virtuous circle” of social capital: Civic engagement, contentment, and interpersonal trust. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, New Orleans, LA.
82.
Shah, D. V.
, Kwak, N., & Holbert, R. L. (2001). “Connecting” and “disconnecting” with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18, 141-162.
83.
Sotirovic, M.
, & McLeod, J. M. (in press). Values, communication behavior, and political participation. Political Communication.
84.
Sullivan, J. L.
, & Transue, J. E. (1999). The psychological underpinnings of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 625-650.
85.
Swanson, D. L.
(1987). Gratification seeking, media exposure, and audience interpretations: Some directions for research. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 31, 237-254.
86.
Taylor, C.
(1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87.
Tönnies, F.
(1940). Fundamental concepts of sociology. New York: American Book Company.
88.
Uslaner, E.
(1998). Social capital, television, and the mean world: Trust, optimism and civic participation. Political Psychology, 19, 441-467.
89.
Uslaner, E. M.
(1999). Trust but verify: Social capital and moral behavior. Social Science Information, 38, 29-55.
90.
Verba, S.
, Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
91.
Vitalari, N. P.
, Venkatesh, A., & Gronhaug, K. (1985). Computing in the home: Shifts in the time allocation patterns of households. Communications of the ACM, 28, 512-522.
92.
Zillmann, D.
(1985). The experimental explorations of gratifications from media entertainment. In D. Zillman & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 225-239). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
93.
Zillmann, D.
, & Bryant, J. (Eds.). (1985). Selective exposure to communication. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
