The idea of interpersonal discussions among citizens being the “soul of democracy” has been treatedalmost as a truism in recent research on media, interpersonal communication, and democratic citizenship. Without a doubt, there is strong evidence to support the notion that interpersonal discussion of politics is a key antecedent of political participation. This study proposes that the relationships between hard news media use, interpersonal discussion of politics, and participatory behavior are far more complex than previously assumed. Specifically, it is expected that hard news media use has an overall positive main effect on political participation. This main effect, however, cloaks significantly different effects for people who talk to others about politics rather frequently and those who do not. National survey data support the differential gains model for newspaper andtelevision hardnews use. This article explores explanations for this phenomenon and implications for future research and policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, J. B.
, Arterton, F. C., & Orren, G. R. (1988). The electronic commonwealth: The impact of new media technologies on democratic politics. New York: Basic Books.
2.
Abramson, P. R.
(1983). Political attitudes in America: Formation and change. San Francisco: Freeman.
3.
Aiken, L. S.
, & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing andinterpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Barnhurst, K. G.
, & Mutz, D. C. (1997). American journalism and the decline in event-centered reporting. Journal of Communication, 47, 27-53.
5.
Baron, R. M.
, & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
6.
Berelson, B. R.
, Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Chaffee, S.
, & Frank, S. (1996). How Americans get political information: Print versus broadcast news. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 48-58.
8.
Cohen, J.
, & Cohen, P. (1983). Appliedmultiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Cloven, D. H.
, & Roloff, M. E. (1995). Cognitive tuning effects of anticipating communication on thought about an interpersonal conflict. Communication Reports, 8, 1-9.
10.
Crewe, I.
(1981). Electoral participation. In D. Butler, H. R. Penniman, & A. Ranney (Eds.), Democracy at the polls: A comparative study of competitive national elections (pp. 216-263). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
11.
Delli Carpini, M. X.
, & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Dennis, J.
(1991). Theories of turnout: An empirical comparison of alienationist and rationalist perspectives. In W. Crotty (Ed.), Political participation and American democracy (pp. 23-65). New York: Greenwood Press.
13.
de Tocqueville, A.
(1984). Democracy in America. New York: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1835)
14.
Eliasoph, N.
(1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Eveland, W. P., Jr.
, & Scheufele, D. A. (1998, April). Communication effects gaps: Putting together the pieces of the puzzle. Paper presented to the annual convention of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
16.
Eveland, W. P., Jr.
, & Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political Communication, 17, 215-237.
17.
Fishkin, J. S.
(1995). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Fiske, S. T.
, Lau, R. R., & Smith, R. A. (1990). On the varieties and utilities of political expertise. Social Cognition, 8, 31-48.
19.
Greenberg, S. R.
(1975). Conversations as units of analysis in the study of personal influence. Journalism Quarterly, 52, 128-131.
20.
Herzog, H.
(1944). What do we really know about daytime listeners? In P. F. Lazarsfeld & F. N. Stanton (Eds.), Radio research 1942-43 (pp. 3-33). New York: Duell, Sloan, & Pearce.
21.
Herzog, H.
(1961). Motivations and gratifications of daily serial listeners. In W. Schramm (Ed.), The process and effects of mass communication (pp. 50-55). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Jaccard, J.
, Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Kleinnijenjuis, J.
(1991). Newspaper complexity and the knowledge gap. European Journal of Communication, 6, 499-522.
24.
Kosicki, G. M.
, & McLeod, J. M. (1990). Learning from political news: Effects of media images and information-processing strategies. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Mass communication and political information processing (pp. 69-83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Krosnick, J. A.
, & Milburn, M. A. (1990). Psychological determinants of political opinionation. Social Cognition, 8, 49-72.
26.
Krugman, H.
(1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 349-356.
27.
Lemert, J. B.
(1981). Does mass communication change public opinion after all? A new approach to effects analysis. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
28.
McLeod, J. M.
, & Becker, L. B. (1974). Testing the validity of gratification measures through political effects analysis. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on mass communications research (pp. 137-164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
McLeod, J. M.
, Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315-336.
30.
Merkle, D. M.
(1996). The National Issues Convention deliberative poll. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 588-619.
31.
Milbrath, L. W.
, & Goel, M. L. (1977). Political participation: How andwhy do people get involved in politics? (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
32.
Nie, N. H.
, Junn, J., & Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Palmgreen, P.
, Wenner, L. A., & Rosengren, K. E. (1985). Uses and gratifications research: The past ten years. In K. E. Rosengren, L. Wenner, & P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications research: Current perspectives (pp. 11-37). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
Rosenstone, S. J.
, & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
35.
Scheufele, D. A.
, Moy, P., & Friedland, L. (1999, August). Deliberation and democracy: Toward an understanding of deliberative processes. Paper presented to the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, New Orleans, LA.
36.
Schudson, M.
(1997). Why conversation is not the soul of democracy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14, 297-309.
37.
Schudson, M.
(1998). The good citizen: A history of American civic life. New York: The Free Press.
38.
Stempel, G. H., III
, & Stewart, R. K. (2000). The Internet provides both opportunities and challenges for mass communication researchers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 541-548.
39.
Verba, S.
, & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Verba, S.
, Nie, N. H., & Kim, J. (1978). Participation andpolitical equality: A seven-nation comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Verba, S.
, Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Verba, S.
, Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H. E., & Nie, N. (1995). American citizen participation study, 1990. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
43.
Wolfinger, R. E.
, & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44.
Zaller, J. R.
(1990). Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response. Social Cognition, 8, 125-153.
45.
Zaller, J. R.
(1992). The nature andorigins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
