Using signal detection methods, this study found participants were better able to discriminate information from news stories with redundant visuals than from news stories with dissonant visuals. This finding, along with the absence of memory decision-criterion differences between the redundant and dissonant conditions, is further evidence that the robust audio/video redundancy effect in the literature reflects differences of memory strength and not simply a shift in decision criterion. More interesting, there were no significant differences when examining correct recognitions only, further pointing to the need for signal detection methods in media memory studies.
Becker, S., & Roberts, C. (1992). Discovering mass communication (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
2.
Brosius, H., & Donsbach, W. (1996). How do text-picture relations affect the informational effectiveness of television newscasts?Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40(2), 180-185.
3.
Drew, D., & Grimes, T. (1987). Audio-visual redundancy and TV news recall. Communication Research, 14(4), 452-461.
4.
Graber, D. (1990). Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 134-155.
5.
Graesser, A. (1981). Prose comprehension beyond the word. New York: Springer-Verlag.
6.
Grimes, T. (1990). Encoding TV news messages into memory. Journalism Quarterly, 67(4), 757-766.
7.
Grimes, T. (1991). Mild auditory-visual dissonance in television news may exceed viewer attentional capacity. Human Communication Research, 18(2), 268-298.
8.
Gunter, B. (1987). Poor reception: Misunderstanding and forgetting broadcast news. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Hausman, C. (1992). Crafting the news for electronic media: Writing, reporting, and producing. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
10.
Hewitt, J. (1992). Sequences: Strategies for shooting news in the real world. New York: Mayfield.
11.
Hewitt, J. (1995). Air words: Writing for broadcast news (2nd ed.). New York: Mayfield.
12.
Lang, A. (1995). Defining audio/video redundancy from a limited-capacity information processing perspective. Communication Research, 22(1), 86-115.
13.
MacMillan, N., & Creelman, C. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Murdock, B., & Dufty, P. (1972). Strength theory and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 284-290.
15.
Reese, S. (1984). Visual-verbal redundancy effects on television news learning. Journal of Broadcasting, 28(1), 79-87.
16.
Shapiro, M. (1994). Signal detection measures of recognition memory. In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media messages (pp. 133-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Shapiro, M., & Fox, J. (2002). The role of typical and atypical events in story memory. Human Communication Research, 28(1), 109-135.
18.
Son, J., Reese, S., & Davie, W. (1987). Effects of visual-verbal redundancy and recaps on television news learning. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 31(2), 207-216.
19.
Stephens, M. (1993). Broadcast news (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
20.
Woodall, W. (1986). Information-processing theory and television news. In J. Robinson & R. Levy (Eds.), The main source: Learning from television news (pp. 133-158). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Woodall, W., Davis, D., & Sahin, H. (1983). From the boob tube to the black box: Television news comprehension from an information processing perspective. Journal of Broadcasting, 27(1), 1-23.
