Groups are becoming increasingly important in organizations, and they use electronic groupware to facilitate communication and workflow. The author uses a 2 x 2 laboratory experiment with 96 participants to evaluate the interaction between communication channel and incentive structure when groups have to solve a mixed-motive task. The communication channel variable has two values: face-to-face (FTF) communication and computer-mediated communication (CMC). Also, the incentive structure has two values: group-based and individual-based values. This article compares the performance and information exchange truthfulness of groups under these different experimental conditions. The author utilizes a game theory perspective to study the behavior of members in these groups. The results indicate that communication channel and incentive structure mitigate strategies that lead to decision choices and information exchange truthfulness among members in a group.
Allegeier, A. R., & Byrne, D. (1973). Attraction toward the opposite sex as a determinant of physical proximity. Journal of Social Psychology, 90, 213-219.
2.
Barkhi, R., Jacob, V. S., Pipino, L., & Pirkul, H. (1998). A study of the effect of communication channel and authority on group decision processes and outcomes. Decision Support Systems, 23, 205-226.
3.
Barkhi, R., Jacob, V. S., & Pirkul, H. (1999). An experimental analysis of face to face versus computer mediated communication channels. INFORMS Journal of Group Decision & Negotiation, 8, 325-347.
4.
Barua, A., Lee, C.-H. S., & Whinston, A. B. (1995). Incentives and computing systems for team-based organizations. Organization Science, 4, 487-504.
5.
Boal, K. B., & Bryson, J. M. (1987). Representing and testing policy implications of planning processes. Strategic Management Journal, 8, 211-231.
6.
Chidambaram, L., & Jones, B. (1993). Impact of communication medium and computer support on group perceptions and performance: A comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings. MIS Quarterly, 17, 465-489.
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Connolly, T., Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 689-703.
9.
Conrath, D. W. (1973). Communication environment and its relationship to organizational structure. Management Science, 20, 586-603.
10.
Coutts, L. M., & Ledden, M. (1977). Nonverbal compensatory reactions to changes in interpersonal proximity. Journal of Social Psychology, 102, 283-290.
11.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
12.
Dennis, A. R. (1991). Parallelism, anonymity, structure and group size in electronic meetings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
13.
Dennis, A.R., & Kinney, S.T. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: the effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9, 256-274.
14.
DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33, 589-609.
15.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
Easton, G., George, J. F., Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., & Pendergast, M. O. (1990). Using two different electronic meeting system tools for the same task: An experimental comparison. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(1), 85-100.
17.
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin.
18.
Fulk, J., & DeSanctis, G. (1995). Electronic communication and changing organizational forms. Organization Science, 6, 337-349.
19.
Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). Social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. W. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. S., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G. (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14, 529-552.
21.
Giddens, C. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Green, R. G., & Gange, J. J. (1983). Social facilitation: Drive theory and beyond. In H. H. Blumberg, A. P. Hare, V. Kent, & M. Davis (Eds.), Small groups and interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 141-153). London: Wiley.
23.
Handy, S., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (1996). The future of telecommuting. Futures, 28, 227-240.
24.
Hightower, R. T., & Sayeed, L. (1995). The impact of computer mediated communication systems on biased group discussion. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(1), 33-44.
25.
Hightower, R. T., & Sayeed, L. (1996). Effects of communication mode and prediscussion information distribution characteristics on information exchange in groups. Information Systems Research, 7, 451-465.
26.
Johansen, R., Martin, A., Mittman, R., Saffo, P. I., Gibbet, D., & Benson, S. (1991). Leading business teams. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Johnson, J. D. (1993). Organizational communication structure. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28.
Lee, A. S. (1994). Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quarterly, 18, 143-157.
29.
Markus, M. L. (1994). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science, 5, 502-527.
30.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall.
31.
McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1993). Putting the “group” back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems (pp.78-96). New York: Macmillan.
32.
Monge, P.R., & Kirste, K. K. (1980). Measuring proximity in human organization. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 110-115.
33.
Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
34.
Ngwenyama, O. K., & Lee, A. S. (1997). Communication richness in electronic mail: critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quarterly, 21, 145-167.
35.
Nunamaker, J. F., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., & George, J. F. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34(7), 41-61.
36.
Nyhart, J. D., & Dauer, E. A. (1986). A preliminary analysis of the uses of scientific models in dispute prevention, management, and resolution. Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution, 1986, 29-54.
37.
Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1985). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfeld (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 173-191). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
Poole, M. S., Shannon, D. L., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Communication media and negotiation processes. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Roloff (Eds.), Communication and negotiation (pp. 46-67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (1989). Deindividuation and self-regulation of behavior. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 87-109). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Rhee, H.-S., Pirkul, H., Jacob, V. S., & Barkhi, R. (1995). Effects of computer-mediated communication on group negotiation: An empirical study. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
41.
Rice, R. E. (1992). Using network concepts to clarify courses and mechanisms of social influence. In G. Barnett & W. Richards, Jr. (Eds.), Advances in communication network analysis (pp. 219-244). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42.
Rice, R. E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 219-244.
43.
Rice, R. E., & Gattiker, U. E. (2001). New media and organizational structuring. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 544-584). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Schmitz, J., & Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail. Communication Research, 18, 487-523.
45.
Sheffield, J. (1989). The effects of bargaining orientation and communication medium on negotiations in the bilateral monopoly task: A comparison of decision room and computer conferencing communication media. In K. Brice & C. Lewis (Eds.), CHI 1989: Conference on human factors in computing systems proceedings (pp. 43-48). New York: ACM Press.
46.
Sheffield, J. (1992). The effects of bargaining orientation and communication medium on negotiation. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
47.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, E. B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley.
48.
Straus, S. G. (1999). Testing a typology of tasks: An empirical validation of McGrath’s (1984) group task circumplex. Small Group Research, 30, 166-187.
49.
Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1991). An experimental investigation of the impact of computer based decision aids on decision making strategies. Information Systems Research, 2(2), 87-115.
50.
Trevino, L., Lengel, R., & Daft, R. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness and media choice in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Communications Research, 14, 553-575.
51.
Turoff, M., Hiltz, S. R., Bahgat, A. N. F., & Rana, A. R. (1993). Distributed group support systems. MIS Quarterly, 17, 399-417.
52.
Watson, R., DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1988). Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12, 463-478.
53.
Whang, S. (1993). Analysis of interorganizational information sharing. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3, 257-277.
54.
Zack, M. H. (1993). Interactivity and communication mode choice in ongoing management groups. Information Systems Research, 4, 207-239.
55.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
