The inferences individuals make about others' goals is an integral, but neglected, aspect of empirical and theoretical work on social interaction. An original theoretical framework is proposed to account for interindividual agreement and certainty of goal inferences. Two experiments applied the framework to explain how contextual ambiguity and tactical functionality affected agreement and certainty. Results generally support hypotheses regarding agreement, such that goal inferences converged (i.e., interobserver agreement increased) as the context and tactic became more compatible, yet results largely do not support hypotheses for inference certainty, as the only significant effect that emerged was that certainty was higher in unambiguous than ambiguous contexts. A reconsideration of the theoretical framework on goal detection is discussed and implications are advanced.
Argyle, M., Furnham, A., & Graham, J.A. (1981). Social situations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Bargh, J.A., & Barndollar, K. (1996). Automaticity in action: The unconscious as repository of chronic goals and motives. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 457-481). New York: Guilford.
3.
Benoit, P., & Follert, V. (1986). Appositions in plans and scripts: An application to initial interactions. In D. G. Ellis & W. A. Donohue (Eds.), Contemporary issues in language and discourse processes (pp. 239-256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Berger, C.R. (1986). Uncertain outcome values in predicted relationships: Uncertainty reduction theory then and now. Human Communication Research, 13, 34-38.
5.
Berger, C.R. (2000). Goal detection and efficiency: Neglected aspects of message production. Communication Theory, 10, 156-166.
6.
Berger, C.R. (2003). Message production skill in social interaction . In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 257-289). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Berger, C.R., & Bradac, J.J. (1982). Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relations. London: Edward Arnold.
9.
Berger, C.R., & Kellermann, K. (1994). Acquiring social information . In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 1-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Blunter, R., & Sommer, R. (1988). Sentence processing and lexical access: The influence of the focus-identifying task. Journal of Memory & Language , 27, 359-367.
11.
Bogdan, R.J. (1997). Interpreting minds: The evolution of a practice . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Caillies, S., & Denhière, G. (2001). The interaction between textual structures and prior knowledge: Hypotheses, data and simulations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 17-31.
13.
Carberry, S. (1990). Plan recognition in natural language dialogue . Cambridge: MIT Press.
14.
Clark, R.D., & Word, L.E. (1972). Why don't bystanders help? Because of ambiguity?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 24, 392-400.
15.
Cody, M.J., Canary, D.J., & Smith, S.W. (1994). Compliance-gaining goals: An inductive analysis of actors' goal types, strategies, and successes. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 33-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Dillard, J.P. (1990). The nature and substance of goals in tactical communication. In M. J. Cody & M. L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The psychology of tactical communication (pp. 70-90). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
17.
Dillard, J.P. (1997). Explicating the goal construct: Tools for theorists . In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 47-70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Dillard, J.P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J.M. (1989). Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs , 56, 19-38.
19.
Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Fitzsimons, G.M., & Bargh, J.A. (2003). Thinking of you: Nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals associated with relationship partners. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84, 148-163.
21.
Gallardo, S. (2005). Pragmatic support in medical recommendations in popularized texts. Journal ofPragmatics, 37, 813-835.
22.
Gorfein, D. S. (Ed.). (2001). On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23.
Gottman, J.M., & Roy, A.K. (1990). Sequential analysis: A guide for behavioral researchers . New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Graesser, A.C., & Clark, L.F. (1985). Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge . Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25.
Greene, J. O. (Ed.). (1997a). Message production: Advances in communication theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Greene, J.O. (1997b). A second generation action assembly theory. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 151-170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
28.
Hewes, D.E. (1995). Cognitive processing of problematic messages: Reinterpreting to “unbias” texts. In D. E. Hewes (Ed.), The cognitive bases of interpersonal communication (pp. 113-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Honeycutt, J.M. (2003). Imagined interactions: Daydreaming about communication . Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
30.
Kanekar, S., & Miranda, J.P. (1990). Perceptions of direct versus indirect helping behavior in a hypothetical criminal emergency. Irish Journal of Psychology, 11, 221-237.
31.
Kellermann, K., & Kim, M.-S. (1991, May). Working within constraints: Tactical choices in the pursuit of social goals. Paper presented at the International Communication Association convention , Miami, FL.
32.
Kellermann, K., & Shea, B.C. (1996). Threats, suggestions, hints, and promises: Gaining compliance efficiently and politely. Communication Quarterly , 44, 145-165.
33.
Kim, M.-S. (1994). Cross cultural comparisons of the perceived importance of conversational constraints. Human Communication Research , 21, 128-151.
34.
Lakey, S.G., & Canary, D.J. (2002). Actor goal achievement and sensitivity to partner as critical factors in understanding interpersonal communication competence and conflict strategies. Communication Monographs, 69, 217-235.
35.
Latané, B., & Darley, J.M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 10, 215-221.
36.
Link, K.E., & Kreuz, R.J. (2005). The comprehension of ostensible speech acts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 227-251.
37.
Meyer, J.R. (1990). Cognitive processes underlying the retrieval of compliance-gaining strategies: An implicit rules model. In J. P. Dillard (Ed.), Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages (pp. 57-73). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Sarisbrick.
38.
Palomares, N.A. (2007, November). Did you see it coming? The effects of the specificity and efficiency of goal pursuit on the accuracy and onset of goal detection in social interaction. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
39.
Phillips, W., Baron-Cohen, S., & Rutter, M. (1992). The role of eye contact in goal detection: Evidence from normal infants and children with autism or mental handicap. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 375-383.
40.
Pillow, B.H. (2002). Children's and adults' evaluation of the certainty of deductive inferences, inductive inferences, and guesses. Child Development, 73, 779-792.
41.
Poynor, D.V., & Morris, R.K. (2003). Inferred goals in narratives: Evidence from self-paced reading, recall, and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 3-9.
42.
Rayner, K., & Frazier, L. (1989). Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &Cognition, 15, 779-790.
43.
Russell, A.W., & Schober, M.F. (1999). How beliefs about a partner's goals affect referring in goal-discrepant conversations. Discourse Processes, 27, 1-33.
44.
Saltiel, J., & Woelfel, J. (1975). Inertia in cognitive processes: The role of accumulated information in attitude change. Human Communication Research , 1, 333-344.
45.
Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
47.
Spitzberg, B.H., & Cupach, W.R. (2002). Interpersonal skills. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 564-611). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
Taylor, S.E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing . In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 89-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
Tries, M.A., Skrable, K.W., French, C.S., & Chabot, G.E. (1999). Basic applications of the chi-square statistic using counting data. Health Physics, 77, 441-454.
50.
Uller, C. (2004). Disposition to recognize goals in infant chimpanzees . Animal Cognition, 7, 154-161.
51.
Waldron, V.R. (1991). Achieving communication goals in superior-subordinate relationships: The multi-functionality of upward maintenance tactics. Communication Monographs, 58, 289-306.
52.
Warner, R.G. (1985). Discourse connectives in English. New York: Garland.
53.
Wegner, D.M., & Vallacher, R.R. (1986). Action identification. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 550-582). New York: Guilford.
54.
Wenner, J.A. (2004). Preschoolers' comprehension of goal structure in narratives. Memory, 12, 193-202.
55.
Wierzbicka, A. (1987). English speech act verbs: A semantic dictionary. Sydney, Australia: Academic Press.
56.
Wilensky, R. (1983). Planning and understanding: A computational approach to human reasoning. London: Addison-Wesley .
57.
Wilson, S.R. (1990). Development and test of a cognitive rules model of interaction goals. Communication Monographs, 57, 81-103.
58.
Wilson, S.R. (2002). Seeking and resisting compliance: Why people say what they do when trying to influence others. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
