This study used an experiment embedded within a Web-based survey to examine the influence of contextual (i.e., face-to-face vs. online chat room discussion) and social-psychological factors on individuals' willingness to express opinions. In this experiment, respondents were asked whether they would be willing to express an opinion if they were placed in a face-to-face discussion group in one condition and in an online chat room discussion group in the other condition. Results indicate that print news use, fear of isolation, communication apprehension, future opinion congruency, and communication setting significantly predict willingness to speak out. In addition, not only did fear of isolation have a negative main effect on opinion expression, but this effect was significantly attenuated by computer-mediated discussion. Findings suggest that computer-mediated communication may avoid some of the dysfunctional social-psychological influences found in face-to-face interactions and create a forum conducive for public deliberation.
Baldassare, M., & Katz, C. (1996). Measures of attitude strength as predictors of willingness to speak to the media. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(1), 147-158.
2.
Barber, B.R., Mattson, K., & Peterson, J. (1997). The state of “electronically enhanced democracy”: A survey of the Internet. New Brunswick, NJ: Walt Whitman Center.
3.
Becker, L.B., & Whitney, D.C. (1980). Effects of media dependencies: Audience assessment and government. Communication Research, 7, 95-120.
4.
Brashers, D.E., Adkins, M., & Meyers, R.A. (1994). Argumentation and computer-mediated group decision making. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. 263-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
Cappella, J.N., Price, V., & Nir, L. (2002). Argument repertoire as a reliable and valid measure of opinion quality: Electronic Dialogue Campaign 2000. Political Communication, 19(1), 73-93.
Connolly, T., Jessup, L.M., & Valacich, J.S. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36(6), 689-703.
8.
Daly, J.A. (1989). The assessment of social-communicative anxiety via self-reports: A comparison of measures. Communication Monographs, 45(3), 204-218.
9.
Delli Carpini, M.X. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17(4), 341-349.
10.
de Tocqueville, A. (1945). Democracy in America (2 vols.). New York: Knopf. (Original work published 1835)
11.
Dewey, J. (1954). The public and its problems. Oxford, OH: Ohio University Press.
12.
Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S.J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 685-710.
13.
Eveland, W.P., & Scheufele, D.A. (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political Communication , 17(3), 215-237.
14.
Fishkin, J.S. (1995). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Glynn, C.J., Hayes, A.F., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Perceived support for one's opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the “spiral of silence .” Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 452-463.
17.
Glynn, C., J., & Park, E. (1997). Reference groups, opinion intensity, and public opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9(3), 213-232.
18.
Gonzenbach, W.J., King, C., & Jablonski, P. (1999). Homosexuals and the military: An analysis of the spiral of silence. The Howard Journal of Communications, 10, 281-296.
19.
Guo, Z., & Moy, P. (1998). Medium or message? Predicting dimensions of political sophistication. International Journal of Public Opinion Research , 10(1), 25-50.
20.
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of Bourgeois society. Cambridge , UK: Polity Press.
22.
Hardy, B.W., & Scheufele, D.A. (2005). Examining differential gains from Internet use: Comparing the moderating role of talk and online interactions. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 71-84.
23.
Hayes, A.F., Glynn, C.J., & Shanahan, J. (2005). Validating the willingness to self-censor scale: Individual differences in the effect of the climate of opinion on opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research , 17(4), 443-455.
24.
Hayes, A.F., Shanahan, J., & Glynn, C.J. (2001). Willingness to express one's opinion in a realistic situation as a function of perceived support for that opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13(1), 45-58.
25.
Huang, H. (2005). A cross-cultural test of the spiral of silence . International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(3), 324-345.
26.
Jennings, M.K., & Zeitner, V. (2003). Internet use and civic engagement: A longitudinal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(3), 311-334.
27.
Jessup, L.M., Connolly, T., & Tansik, D.A. (1990). Toward a theory of automated group work: The deindividuating effects of anonymity. Small Group Research, 21(3), 333-348.
28.
Katz, E. (1997). Press-conversation-opinion-action: Gabriel Tarde's public sphere. Philadelphia: Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania .
29.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T.W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123-1134.
30.
Kim, S., Han, M., Shanahan, J., & Berdayes, V. (2004). Talking on “Sunshine in North Korea”: A test of the spiral of silence as a theory of powerful mass media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(1), 39-62.
31.
Lasorsa, D.L. (1991). Political outspokenness: Factors working against the spiral of silence. Journalism Quarterly, 68(1-2), 131-139.
32.
Lea, M., Spears, R., & de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 526-537.
33.
London, S. (1993). Electronic democracy. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.
34.
McCroskey, J.C. (1977). Oral communication apprehension: A summary of recent theory and research. Human Communication Research, 4, 78-96.
35.
McCroskey, J.C., & Beatty, M.J. (1998). Communication apprehension. In J. C. McCroskey, J. A. Daly, M. M. Martin, & M. J. Beatty (Eds.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 215-231). Cresskill, NJ : Hampton Press.
36.
Meyers, R.A., Brashers, D.E., & Hanner, J. (2000). Majority-minority influence: Identifying argumentative patterns and predicting argument-outcome links. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 3-30.
37.
Moy, P., Domke, D., & Stamm, K. (2001). The spiral of silence and public opinion on affirmative action. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(1), 7-25.
38.
Neuwirth, K. (2000). Testing the spiral of silence model: The case of Mexico. International Journal of Public Opinion Research , 12(2), 138-159.
39.
Neuwirth, K., & Frederick, E. (2004). Peer and social influence on opinion expression: Combining the theories of planned behavior and the spiral of silence. Communication Research, 31(6), 669-703.
40.
Neuwirth, K., Frederick, E., & Mayo, C. (2004, November). The spiral of silence and fear of isolation . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago .
41.
Nisbet, E.C., Nisbet, M.C., Scheufele, D.A., & Shanahan, J.E. (2004). Public diplomacy, television news, and Muslim opinion. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(2), 11-37.
42.
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). Spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion . Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43-51.
43.
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion—Our social skin (2nd ed.). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
44.
Patterson, T.E., & McClure, R.D. (1976). Civic lessons: Report on four civic journalism projects funded by the Pew Center for Civic Journalism. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.
45.
Price, V., & Cappella, J.N. (2002). Online deliberation and its influence: The Electronic Dialogue Project in Campaign 2000. IT & Society, 1(1), 303-329.
46.
Price, V., Nir, L., & Cappella, J.N. (2006). Normative and informational influences in online political discussions. Communication Theory, 16(1), 47-74.
47.
Rains, S.A. (2007). The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research, 34(1), 100-125.
48.
Rice, R.E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 451-484.
49.
Salmon, C.T., & Neuwirth, K. (1990). Perceptions of opinion “climates” and willingness to discuss the issue of abortion. Journalism Quarterly, 67(3), 567-577.
50.
Scheufele, D.A. (2002). Examining differential gains from mass media and their implications for participatory behavior. Communication Research, 29(1), 45-64.
51.
Scheufele, D.A., Shanahan, J., & Lee, E. (2001). Real talk: Manipulating the dependent variable in the spiral of silence research. Communication Research , 28(3), 304-324.
52.
Shanahan, J., Scheufele, D., Yang, F., & Hizi, S. (2004). Cultivation and spiral of silence effects: The case of smoking. Mass Communication & Society, 7(4), 413-428.
53.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley.
54.
Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T.W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(2), 157-187.
55.
Straus, S.G. (1996). Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 27(1), 115-142.
56.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 61-76). London: Academic Press.
57.
Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2003). Social cues and impression formation in CMC. Journal of Communication, 53(4), 676-693.
58.
Willnat, L. (1996). Mass media and political outspokenness in Hong Kong: Linking the third-person effect and the spiral of silence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8(2), 187-212.
59.
Willnat, L., Lee, W., & Detenber, B.H. (2002). Individual-level predictors of public outspokenness: A test of the spiral of silence theory in Singapore . International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(4), 391-412.
60.
Zigurs, I., Poole, M.S., & DeSanctis, G.L. (1988). A study of influence in computer-mediated group decision making. MIS Quarterly, 12(4), 625-644.
