Gender inequalities in Internet use are smaller among younger people. It is unclear whether these differences can be explained by the varying circumstances in which different generations grew up or by other factors that vary within an individual’s life time. This article tests a model which proposes that generation determines the level of Internet use and life stage determines gender differences in Internet use. Descriptive analyses of a representative sample of 1,578 British Internet users confirm that there continue to be small but significant gender differences for most uses of the Internet. The findings from a series of linear regressions suggest that gender differences vary for different life stages related to occupation and marital status. This is true especially for typically male uses. The article concludes that other factors related to life stage will continue to influence gender differences in Internet use in the future.
Anderson, B. ( 2004). Everyday research in the knowledge society: Who uses ICTs to find a job and health information. Colchester , UK: University of Essex.
2.
Barber, J.S., & Axinn, W.G. ( 1998). Gender role attitudes and marriage among young women . Sociological Quarterly, 39(1), 11-31.
3.
Belsky, J., & Pensky, E. ( 1988). Marital change during the transition to parenthood . Marriage and Family Review, 12(3/4), 133-156.
4.
Bobbitt-Zeher, D. ( 2007). The gender income gap and the role of education . Sociology of Education, 80(1), 1-22.
5.
Broos, A. ( 2005). Gender and information and communication technologies (ICT) anxiety: Male self-assurance and female hesitation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 21-31.
6.
Brown, S.L. ( 2003). Relationship quality dynamics of cohabiting unions . Journal of Family Issues, 24, 583-601.
7.
Cody, M.J., Dunn, D., Hoppin, S., & Wendt, P. ( 1999). Silver surfers: Training and evaluating Internet use among older adult learners. Communication Education, 48, 269-286.
8.
Cowan, C.P., & Cowan, P.A. ( 1992). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. New York: Basic Books .
9.
Cummings, J.N., & Kraut, R. ( 2002). Domesticating computers and the Internet. Information Society, 18, 221-231.
10.
Denton, M., & Boos, L. ( 2007). The gender wealth gap: Structural and material constraints and implications for later life. Journal of Women & Aging , 19(3-4), 105-120.
11.
Dholakia, R.R. ( 2006). Gender and IT in the household: Evolving patterns of Internet use in the United States. Information Society , 22, 231-240.
12.
Dittmar, H., Long, K., & Meek, R. ( 2004). Buying on the Internet: Gender differences in on-line and conventional buying motivations. Sex Roles, 50, 423-444.
13.
Dutton, W., & Helsper, E.J. ( 2007). The Internet in Britain: 2007. Oxford , UK: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford .
14.
Dutton, W., Helsper, E.J., & Gerber, M.M. ( 2009). The Internet in Britain: 2009. Oxford, UK: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford .
15.
Escoffery, C., Miner, K.R., Adame, D.D., Butler, S., McCormick, L., & Mendell, E. ( 2005). Internet use for health information among college students . Journal of American College Health, 53, 183-188.
16.
Evertsson, M., & Nermo, M. ( 2007). Changing resources and the division of housework: A longitudinal study of Swedish couples. European Sociological Review, 23, 455-470.
17.
Fallows, D. ( 2005). How women and men use the Internet. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project .
18.
Faulkner, W. ( 2002). Women, gender in/and ICT: Evidence and reflections from the UK (No. IST-2000-26329). Strategies for Inclusion: Gender and the Information Society (SIGIS) Project. Available from http://www.rcss.ed.ac.uk/sigis/public/displaydoc/full/D02_Part3 .
19.
Garbarino, E., & Strahilevitz, M. (2004). Gender differences in the perceived risk of buying online and the effects of receiving a site recommendation . Journal of Business Research, 57, 768-775.
20.
Gill, R., & Grint, K. ( 1995). The gender technology relation: Contemporary theory and research. In R. Gill, & K. Grint (Eds.), The gender-technology relation (pp. 1-28). London: Taylor & Francis.
21.
Grimes, G.A., Hough, M.G., & Signorella, M.L. (2007). Email end users and splam: Relations of gender and age group to attitudes and actions. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 318-332.
22.
Gross, E.F. ( 2004). Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report . Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology , 25, 633-649.
23.
Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. ( 2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 432-448.
24.
Helsper, E.J., Dutton, W.H., & Gerber, M. ( 2008). To be a network society: A cross-national perspective on the Internet in Britain. OII Research Report, 17. Retrieved February 18, 2010, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1323813
25.
Helsper, E.J., & Eynon, R. ( 2009). Digital natives: Where is the evidence?British Educational Research Journal. iFirst Article, 1-18. Retrieved February 18, 2010, from https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/01411920902989227
26.
Helsper, E.J., & Gerber, M.M. ( 2010). The (im)plausability of cross-cultural comparisons in Internet use. LSE Working paper.
27.
Herring, S.C. ( 2002). Computer-mediated communication on the Internet . Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 109-168.
28.
Hogan, R., Perrucci, C.C., & Behringer, A. ( 2005). Enduring inequality: Gender and employment income in late career. Sociological Spectrum, 25(1), 53-77.
29.
Holbrook, M.B., & Hirschman, E.C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132-140.
30.
Holt, D.B. ( 1995). How consumers consume: A typology of consumption practices . Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 1-16.
31.
Jackson, L.A., Ervin, K.S., Gardner, P.D., & Schmitt, N. ( 2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44, 363-379.
32.
Joiner, R., Gavin, J., Duffield, J., Brosnan, M., Crook, C., & Durndell, A., et al. (2005). Gender, Internet identification, and Internet anxiety: Correlates of Internet use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8, 371-378.
33.
Joshi, H., Makepeace, G., & Dolton, P. ( 2007). More or less unequal? Evidence on the pay of men and women from the British birth cohort studies. Gender Work and Organization, 14(1), 37-55.
34.
Kangas, O., & Rostgaard, T. ( 2007). Preferences or institutions? Work-family life opportunities in sevenEuropean countries. Journal of European Social Policy , 17, 240-256.
35.
Karavidas, M., Lim, N.K., & Katsikas, S.L. (2005). The effects of computers on older adult users. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 697-711.
36.
Li, N., & Kirkup, G. ( 2007). Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK. Computers & Education, 48, 301-317.
37.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. ( 2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9, 671-696.
38.
Loader, B. ( 1998). Cyberspace divide: Equality, agency, and policy in the information society. In B. Loader (Ed.), Cyberspace divide: Equality, agency, and policy in the information society (pp. 3-18). New York: Routledge .
39.
Loges, W.E., & Jung, J.Y. ( 2001). Exploring the digital divide-Internet connectedness and age. Communication Research, 28, 536-562.
40.
Norris, P. ( 2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Odell, P., Korgen, K., Schumacher, P., & Delucchi, M. ( 2000). Internet use among female and male college students . CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 855-862.
42.
Office for National Statistics. (2007). Internet access 2007. Households and individuals. Retrieved January 21, 2010, from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/inta0807.pdf .
43.
Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. ( 2003). Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 111-121.
44.
Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. ( 2005). Gender differences in information technology usage: A U.S.-Japan comparison. Sociological Perspectives, 48(1), 105-133.
45.
Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. ( 2007). Digital inequality: A five country comparison using microdata . Social Science Research, 36, 1135-1155.
46.
Papastergiou, M., & Solomonidou, C. (2005). Gender issues in Internet access and favourite Internet activities among Greek high school pupils inside and outside school. Computers & Education, 44, 377-393.
47.
Rindfuss, R.R., & Van Den Heuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation-A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single. Population and Development Review, 16, 703-726.
48.
Sayer, L.C. ( 2005). Gender, time and inequality: Trends in women’s and men’s paid work, unpaid work and free time. Social Forces, 84, 285-303.
49.
Selwyn, N. ( 2007). Hi-tech = guy-tech? An exploration of undergraduate students’ gendered perceptions of information and communication technologies . Sex Roles, 56, 525-536.
50.
Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., Furlong, J., & Madden, L. ( 2003). Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing and Society, 23, 561-582.
51.
Shaw, L.H., & Grant, L.M. ( 2002). Users divided? Exploring the gender gap in Internet use . Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5, 517-527.
52.
Singh, S. ( 2001). Gender and the use of the Internet at home. New Media and Society, 3, 395-416.
53.
South, S.J., & Spitze, G. ( 1994). Housework in marital and non-marital households . American Sociological Review, 59, 327-347.
54.
Torkzadeh, G., Chang, J.C.J., & Demirhan, D. ( 2006). A contingency model of computer and Internet self-efficacy . Information & Management, 43, 541-550.
55.
Traeen, B., Nilsen, T.S., & Stigum, H. ( 2006). Use of pornography in traditional media and on the Internet in Norway. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 245-254.
56.
van Dijk, J.A.G.M. ( 2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
57.
van Rompaey, V., Roe, K., & Struys, K. ( 2002). Children’s influence on Internet access at home: Adoption and use in the family context. Information, Communication & Society, 5, 189-206.
58.
Venkatesh, A., & Vitalari, N. ( 1992). An emerging distributed work arrangement: An investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home. Management Science , 38, 1687-1706.
59.
Vogler, C., Brockmann, M., & Wiggins, R.D. ( 2006). Intimate relationships and changing patterns of money management at the beginning of the twenty-first century. British Journal of Sociology, 57, 455-482.
60.
Vogler, C., Lyonette, C., & Wiggins, R.D. ( 2008). Money, power and spending decisions in intimate relationships . Sociological Review, 56(1), 117-143.
61.
Wajcman, J. ( 2004). Techno feminism. Cambridge , UK: Polity.
62.
Warner, D., & Procaccino, J.D. (2007). Women seeking health information: Distinguishing the Web user. Journal of Health Communication , 12, 787-814.
63.
Warschauer, M. ( 2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
64.
Wasserman, I.M., & Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005). Gender and the Internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 252-270.
65.
Weiser, E.B. ( 2000). Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: A two-sample comparison. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 167-178.
66.
Wolin, L.D., & Korgaonkar, P. (2003). Web advertising: Gender differences in beliefs, attitudes and behavior. Internet Research-Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 13, 375-385.
