The MUM effect refers to the robust research finding that people are more hesitant to share bad news relative to good news. An experiment utilized a false feedback test design to determine whether the MUM effect stems from a reluctance to share bad news, an eagerness to share good news, or both. Participants (N = 114) shared good, neutral, or bad news (i.e., high, medium, or low test scores) to a stranger. News valence, delay before response, and reluctance were measured. Delay before response and reluctance were linearly related to test score suggesting both eagerness to share good news and reluctance to share bad news. Practical and theoretical implications are discussed.
Bond, C.F., Jr., & Anderson, E.L. (1987). The reluctance to transmit bad news: Private discomfort or public display? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 176-187.
2.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Buckman, R. ( 1984). Breaking bad news: Why is it still so difficult? British Medical Journal, 288, 1597-1599.
4.
Carlsmith, J.M., & Gross, A.E. ( 1969). Some effects of guilt on compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 232-239.
5.
Carter, J.H., Nutt, J.G., & Carter, E.H. ( 2007). Breaking bad news: Patients’ perspectives on being given the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Neurology , 68, A230-A231.
6.
Casarett, D.J., & Quill, T.E. ( 2007). "I’m not ready for hospice": Strategies for timely and effective hospice discussions. Annals of Internal Medicine , 146, 443-449.
7.
Dibble, J.L., & Levine, T.R. ( 2008, May 21). Hesitation to share bad news between friends and strangers: Self-presentation and emotion-centered reasons for the MUM effect. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
8.
Dillard, J.P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J.M. ( 1989). Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56, 19-38.
9.
Dunnet, C.W. ( 1980). Pairwise multiple comparisons in the unequal variance case. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 796-800.
10.
Dworkind, M.A. ( 2006). Giving bad news: How to give hope in a hopeless situation . Journal of Palliative Care, 22(3), 221.
11.
Eggly, S., Penner, L., Albrecht, T., Cline, R.J.W., Foster, T., & Naughton, M., et al. (2006). Discussing bad news in the outpatient oncology clinic: Rethinking current communication guidelines. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24, 716-719.
12.
Fisher, C.D. ( 1979). Transmission of positive and negative feedback to subordinates: A laboratory investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology , 64, 533-540.
13.
Goffman, E. ( 1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Pantheon Books.
14.
Greenberg, L.W., Ochsenschlager, D., O’Donnell, R., Mastruserio, J., & Cohen, G.J. ( 1999). Communicating bad news: A pediatric department’s evaluation of a simulated intervention. Pediatrics, 103, 1210-1217.
15.
Ito, T.A., Larsen, J.T., Smith, N.K., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887-900.
16.
Johnson, D.I., Roloff, M.E., & Riffee, M.A. ( 2004). Politeness theory and refusals of requests: Face threat as a function of expressed obstacles. Communication Studies , 55, 227-238.
17.
Johnson, R.E., Conlee, M.C., & Tesser, A. ( 1974). Effects of similarity of fate on bad news transmission: A reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 29, 644-648.
18.
Miller, G.R., & Steinberg, M. ( 1975). Between people: A new analysis of interpersonal communication . Chicago: Science Research Associates .
19.
Ptacek, J.T., & Eberhardt, T.L. (1996). Breaking bad news: A review of the literature. Journal of the American Medical Association , 276, 496-502.
20.
Ptacek, J.T., Ptacek, J.J., & Ellison, N.M. ( 2001). "I’m sorry to tell you…" Physician’s reports of breaking bad news. Journal of Behavioral Medicine , 24, 205-217.
21.
Rosen, S., & Tesser, A. ( 1970). On reluctance to communicate undesirable information: The MUM effect. Sociometry, 33, 253-263.
22.
Rosen, S., & Tesser, A. ( 1972). Fear of negative evaluation and the reluctance to transmit bad news. Journal of Communication, 22, 124-141.
23.
Searle, J.R. ( 1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Strauss, R.P., Sharp, M.C., Lorch, C., & Kachalia, B. ( 1995). Physicians and the communication of "bad news": Parent experiences of being informed of their child’s cleft lip and/or palate . Pediatrics, 96, 82-89.
25.
Sussman, S.W., & Sproull, L. ( 1999). Straight talk: Delivering bad news through electronic communication. Information Systems Research, 10, 150-166.
26.
Sweeny, K., & Shepperd, J.A. (2007). Being the best bearer of bad tidings. Review of General Psychology, 11, 235-257.
27.
Tesser, A., & Rosen, S. ( 1975). The reluctance to transmit bad news. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 193-232). New York: Academic Press.
28.
Tesser, A., Rosen, S., & Batchelor, T. ( 1972). Some message variables and the MUM effect. Journal of Communication, 22, 239-256.
29.
Tesser, A., Rosen, S., & Conlee, M.C. ( 1972). News valence and available recipient as determinants of news transmission. Sociometry, 35, 619-628.
30.
Tesser, A., Rosen, S., & Tesser, M. ( 1971). On the reluctance to communicate undesirable messages (the MUM effect): A field study. Psychological Reports, 29, 651-654.
31.
Uysal, A., & Oner-Ozkan, B. (2007). A self-presentational approach to transmission of good and bad news. Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 63-78.
32.
Weenig, M.W.H., Groenenboom, A.C.W. J., & Wilke, H.A.M. ( 2001). Bad news transmission as a function of the definitiveness of consequences and the relationship between communicator and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 449-461.
33.
Widerman, E. ( 2002). Communicating a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis to an adult: What physicians need to know. Behavioral Medicine, 28, 45-52.
34.
Wilson, S.R., Aleman, C.G., & Leatham, G.B. ( 1998). Identity implications of influence goals: A revised analysis of face-threatening acts and application to seeking compliance with same-sex friends. Human Communication Research, 25, 64-96.
35.
Wilson, S.R., & Feng, H. ( 2007). Interaction goals and message production: Conceptual and methodological developments. In D. Roskos-Ewoldsen & J. Monahan (Eds.), Communication and social cognition (pp. 71-95). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
Wilson, S.R., Kim, M.-S., & Meischke, H. ( 1991). Evaluating Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory: A revised analysis of directives and face. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25, 215-252.
37.
Wilson, S.R., Kunkel, A.D., Robson, S.J., Olufowote, J.O., & Soliz, J. ( 2009). Identity implications of relationship (re)definition goals: An analysis of face threats and facework as young adults initiate, intensify, and disengage from romantic relationships. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 32-61.
38.
Yariv, E. ( 2006). "Mum effect": Principals’ reluctance to submit negative feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 533-546.
