African American Ethnic and Class-Based Identities on the World Wide Web: Moderating the Effects of Self-Perceived Information Seeking/Finding and Web Self-Efficacy
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2010
African American Ethnic and Class-Based Identities on the World Wide Web: Moderating the Effects of Self-Perceived Information Seeking/Finding and Web Self-Efficacy
The web is a potentially powerful tool for communicating information to diverse audiences. Unfortunately, all groups are not equally represented on the web, and this may have implications for online information seeking. This study investigated the role of class-and ethnic-based identity in self-perceived web-based information seeking/finding and self-efficacy. A questionnaire is administered, asking African Americans about their class and ethnic identities and web use to test a conceptual model predicting that these identities are positively related to web-based information seeking and web self-efficacy, which are then positively related to web-based information finding. Gender and previous web experience are expected to moderate the relationships. Structural equations modeling of these data support most of the predictions and indicate that these identities influence perceptions of online information seeking.
Adelman, P.K. ( 1994). Multiple roles and psychological well-being in a national sample of older adults. Journal of Gerontology Social Science , 49, 277-285.
2.
Agada, J. ( 1999). Inner-city gatekeepers: An exploratory survey of their information use environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(1), 74-85.
3.
Airhihenbuwa, C.O. ( 1995). Health and culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Ali, S.R., McWhirter, E.H., & Chronister, K.M. (2005). Self-efficacy and vocational outcome expectations for adolescents of lower socioeconomic status: A pilot study. Journal of Career Assessment, 13(1), 40-58.
5.
Anwar, M.A., Majid, S., & Eisenschitz, T.S. (2000). Information needs and information seeking behavior of agriculture scientists in Malaysia. Library & Information Science Research, 22, 145-163.
6.
Appiah, O. ( 2003). Americans online: Differences in surfing and evaluating race-targeted web sites by African American andEuropean American users. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 537-555.
7.
Appiah, O. ( 2004). Effects of ethnic identification on web browsers’ attitudes toward and navigational patterns on race-targeted sites. Communication Research, 13, 312-337.
8.
Aries, E., & Seider, M. ( 2005). The interactive relationship between class identity and the college experience: The case of lower income students. Qualitative Sociology, 28, 419-443.
9.
Baker, L.M. ( 1996). A study of the nature of information needed by women with multiple Sclerosis. Library and Information Science Research , 18, 67-81.
10.
Bandura, A. ( 1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
11.
Bandura, A. ( 1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
Bandura, A. ( 1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Education Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
13.
Bandura, A. ( 2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 269-290.
14.
Barzilai-Nahon, K., Rafaeli, S., & Ahituv, N. ( 2004). Measuring gaps in cyberspace: Constructing a comprehensive digital divide index. Proceedings from the Conference of Internet Research 5: Workshop on Measuring the Information Society, Brighton, the United Kingdom.
15.
Bell, E.L., & Nkomo, S.M. ( 1998). Armoring: Learning to withstand racial oppression. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29, 285-295.
16.
Bolam, B., Murphy, S., & Gleeson, K. ( 2004). Individualization and inequalities in health: A qualitative study of class identity and health. Social Science & Medicine , 59, 1355-1365.
17.
Bottero, W. ( 2004). Class Identities and the Identity of Class. Sociology, 38, 985-1003.
18.
Brock, A. ( 2006). A belief in humanity is a belief in colored men: Using culture to span the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), 357-374.
19.
Bucy, E.P. ( 2000). Social access to the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5(1), 50-61.
20.
Bunz, U., Curry, C., & Voon, W. ( 2007). Perceived versus actual computer-email-web fluency. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2331-2344.
21.
Campbell, W.K., & Twenge, J.M. ( 2002). Self-esteem and socioeconomic status: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(1), 59-71.
22.
Coffin, R.J., & MacIntyre, P.D. (1999). Motivational influences on computer-related affective states. Computers in Human Behavior , 15, 549-569.
23.
Collins, K.W., & Lightsey, O.R. , Jr. (2001). Racial identity, generalized self-efficacy, and self-esteem: A pilot study of a mediation model for AfricanAmerican women. Journal of Black Psychology, 27, 272-287.
24.
Cultural Access Group. (2001). Ethnicity in the electronic age: Looking at the Internet through multicultural lens. Access Worldwide Communications. Retrieved November 6, 2006, from http://www.accesscag.com/Internet%20report%20v.pdf
25.
Deshpande, R., Hoyer, W.D., & Donthu, N. ( 1986). The intensity of ethnic affiliation: A study of the sociology of Hispanic consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 214-220.
26.
Detlefsen, E.G. ( 2004). Where am I to go? Use of the Internet for consumer health information by two vulnerable communities. Library Trends , 53, 283-300.
27.
Donthu, N., & Cherian, J. ( 1992). Hispanic coupon usage: The impact of strong and weak ethnic identification. Psychology & Marketing, 9(6), 501-510.
28.
Durant, T.J., & Sparrow, K.L. ( 1997). Race and class consciousness among lower- and middle-class African Americans. Journal of African American Studies, 27, 334-351.
29.
Durndell, A., Haag, Z., Asenova, D., & Laithwaite, H. (2000). Computer self-efficacy and gender. In E. Balka & R. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the IFIP TC9/WG9.1 Seventh international conference on woman, work and computerization: Charting a course to the future (pp. 78-85). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
30.
Eastin, M., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved January 15, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html
31.
Fallows, D. ( 2005). How women and men use the Internet. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved November 28, 2007, from http://www.pewInternet.org
32.
Gecas, V., & Seff, M.A. ( 1990). Social class and self-esteem: Psychology centrality, compensation, and the relative effects of work and home. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 165-173.
33.
Gibbons, M. ( 2005). A historical overview of health disparities and the potential of eHealth solutions. Journal of Medical Internet Research , 7(5), 50.
34.
Gibbons, M. ( 2008). eHealth solutions for healthcare disparities. New York: Springer.
35.
Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S., (2006), Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 432-448.
36.
Haythornthwaite, C. ( 2007, January). Social facilitators and inhibitors to online fluency. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii.
37.
Hecht, M.L. ( 1993). 2002-A research odyssey: Toward the development of a communication theory of identity. Communication Monographs , 60, 76-82.
38.
Hecht, M.L., Jackson, R.L., II, & Ribeau, S.A. (2003). African American communication: Exploring identity and culture. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Hecht, M.L., & Krieger, J.K. ( 2006). The principle of cultural grounding in school-based substance use prevention: The drug resistance strategies project. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 301-319.
40.
Hecht, M.L., Larkey, L.K., & Johnson, J.N. ( 1992). African American and European American perceptions of problematic issues in interethnic communication effectiveness. Human Communication Research, 19, 209-236.
41.
Hecht, M.L., Warren, J., Jung, J., & Kreiger, J. ( 2005). Communication theory of identity. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 257-278). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. ( 2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology , 53, 575-604.
43.
Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P., & Schlosser, A. ( 2000). The evolution of the digital divide: How gaps in Internet access may impact electronic commerce. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(3). Retrieved March 6, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol5/issue3/hoffman.html
44.
Hogg, M.A. ( 1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new direction . European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85-111.
45.
Hoyle, R.H., & Kenny, D.A. ( 1999). Sample size, reliability, and tests of statistical mediation . In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 195-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Igbaria, M., & Chakrabarti, A. (1990). Computer anxiety and attitudes towards computer use. Behavior & Information Technology , 9, 229-241.
47.
Jackson, L.A., Barbatsis, G., von Eye, A., Biocca, F., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H. (2002). Internet use in low-income families: Implications for the digital divide. IT & Society , 1, 141-165.
48.
Jackson, L.A., Ervin, K.S., Gardner, P.D., & Schmitt, N. ( 2001a). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 44, 363-379.
49.
Jackson, L.A., Ervin, K.S., Gardner, P.D., & Schmitt, N. ( 2001b). The racial digital divide: Motivational, affective, and cognitive correlates of Internet use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 2019-2046.
50.
Jackson, L.A., vonEye, A., Barbatsis, G., Biocca, F., Fitzgerald, H., & Zhao, Y. ( 2004). The impact of Internet use on the other side of the digital divide. Communications of the ACM, 47(7), 43-47.
51.
Jameson, A.M., & Sligo, F.X. ( 2000). The knowledge- behavior gap in use of health information . Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 51, 858-869.
52.
Jeong, W. ( 2004). Unbreakable ethnic bonds: Information- seeking behavior of Korean graduate students in the United States. Library and Information Science Research, 26, 384-400.
53.
Kalichman, S., Weinhardt, L., Benotsch, E., DiFonzo, K., Luke, W., & Austin, J. ( 2002). Internet access and Internet use for health information among people living with HIV-AIDS. Patient Education and Counseling , 46, 109-116.
54.
Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S.S. ( 2006). The psychological appeal of personalized content in web portals: Does customization affect attitudes and behavior. Journal of Communication, 56, 110-132.
55.
Katz, J.E., & Rice, R.E. ( 2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
56.
Kline, R.B. ( 2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
57.
Kolko, B. ( 2000). Race in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.
58.
Kvasny, L. ( 2006). Let the sisters speak: Understanding information technology from the standpoint of the ‘other’. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 37(4), 13-25.
59.
Kvasny, L., & Warren, J. ( 2006). The representation and performance of menu-driven identities in online health portals. In E. Trauth (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information technology and gender (pp. 745-751). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
60.
Lareau, A. ( 2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review , 67, 747-776.
61.
Lazarus, W., & Lipper, L. ( 2000). Online content for low-income and underserved Americans: The digital divide’s new frontier. Santa Monica, CA: The Children’s Partnership.
62.
Lazarus, W., Lipper, L., Roberts, K., Fireman, R., & Rose, R. ( 2003). The search for high-quality online content for low-income and underserved Americans: Evaluating and producing what’s needed. Retrieved November 2, 2006, from http://www.childrenspartnership.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Reports1&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentFileID=1050
63.
Liaw, S.S. ( 2002). Understanding user perceptions of world wide web environments . Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 137-148.
64.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. ( 1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
65.
McCubbin, H. I.,Thompson, E. A.,Thompson, A. I., & Futrell, J. A. (Eds.). (1998). Resiliency in African-American families (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
Means-Coleman, R. ( 1998). African American viewers and the African American situation comedy: Situating racial humor. New York: Garland Publishing.
67.
Media Audit. (2007). The Media Audit FYI: Insights for today’s changing media and consumer marketplace . Retrieved October 2, 2007, from http://www.themediaaudit.com/aug07_fyi.pdf
68.
Mehra, B., Merkel, C., & Bishop, A. ( 2004). The Internet for empowerment of minority and marginalized users. New Media and Society, 6, 781-782.
69.
Nakamura, L. ( 2004). Interrogating the digital divide: The political economy of race and commerce in new media. In P. Howard & S. Jones (Eds.), Society online: The Internet in context (pp. 71-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70.
Napoli, P.M. ( 2001). Consumer use of medical information from electronic and paper media: A literature review. In R. Rice & J. Katz (Eds.), The Internet and health communication: Experiences and expectations (pp. 79-98). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71.
Ndiaye, K., Krieger, J.R., Warren, J.R., Hecht, M., & Okuyemi, K. ( 2008). Health disparities and discrimination: Three perspectives . Journal of Health Disparities and Research, (2)2, 51-72.
72.
Nicholson, W., Grason, H., & Powe, N. ( 2003). The relationship of race to women’s use of health information resources. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 188, 580-585.
73.
Norris, T.D., & Conceicão, S. (2004). Narrowing the digital divide in low-income, urban communities. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 101, 69-81.
74.
Oyserman, D., Fryberg, S.A., & Yoder, N. ( 2007). Identity-based motivation and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1011-1027.
75.
Oyserman, D., & Markus, H.R. ( 1993). The sociocultural self. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 187-220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76.
Pew Internet and American Life. (2007). Demographics of Internet users. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from http://www.pewInternet.org/trends/User_Demo_6.15.07.htm
77.
Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2000). Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior , 16, 13-29.
78.
Selwyn, N. ( 2003). Apart from technology: Understanding people’s non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life. Technology in Society, 25, 99-116
79.
Shapiro, J.R., & Neuberg, S.L. ( 2007). From stereotype threat to stereotype threats: Implications of a multi-threat framework for causes, moderators, mediators, consequences, and interventions. Personality and Social Psychology Review , 11(2), 107-130.
80.
Shepard, C., Giles, H., & Le Poire, B.A. (2001). Communication accommodation theory. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 33-56). New York: John Wiley.
81.
Sherer, M., Maddux, J., Mel-Caclante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R.W. ( 1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation . Psychobiological Reports, 51, 663-671.
82.
Spink, A., & Cole, C. ( 2001). Information and poverty: Information-seeking channels used by African American low-income households. Library & information Science Research, 23, 45-65.
83.
Stanley, L. ( 2003). Beyond access: Psychosocial barriers to computer literacy . The Information Society, 19, 407-416.
84.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. ( 1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago : Nelson-Hall.
85.
Torkzadeh, G., & Van Dyke, T.P. (2001). Development and validation of an Internet self-efficacy scale. Behavior and Information Technology, 20, 275-280.
86.
Umberson, D. ( 1993). Sociodemographic position, worldviews, and psychological distress. Social Science Quarterly, 74, 575-589.
87.
Van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. ( 2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon . The Information Society, 19, 315-326.
88.
Warren, J.R. ( 2004, November). Black women and online health information seeking . Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
89.
Warren, J.R., Allen, M., Okuyemi, K., Kvasny, L., & Hecht, M.L. ( 2009). Targeting single parents in pre-adolescent substance use prevention: Internet characteristics and information relevance. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy. Retrieved on March 31, 2009, from http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a911764135
90.
Warren, J.R., Kvasny, L., Hecht, M.L., Ahluwalia, J.S., & Okuyemi, K.S. (in press). Barriers, control and identity in health information seeking: Listening to lower income African American women. Manuscript submitted for publication.
