Many have attributed anti-American sentiment within Arab countries to a highly negative information environment propagated by transnational Arab satellite TV news channels such as Al-Jazeera. However, theoretical models and empirical evidence evaluating the linkages between media exposure and opinion about the United States remains scant. Drawing on theories of media effects, identity, and public opinion, this article develops a theoretical framework explicating how the influence of transnational Arab TV on opinion formation is contingent on competing political identities within the region. Employing 5 years of survey data collected across six Arab countries, we empirically test several propositions about the relationship between Arab TV exposure and public opinion about the United States generated by our theoretical framework. Our results demonstrate significant associations between transnational Arab TV exposure and anti-American sentiment, but also show these associations vary substantially by channel and political identification. The theoretical and policy implications of the study are discussed.
AdayS.LivingstonS.HebertM. (2005). Embedding the truth: A cross-cultural analysis of objectivity and television coverage of the Iraq War. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(1), 3-21.
2.
AlozieE. C. (2004) African perspective on events before the 2003 Iraq war. In Berenger’sR. (Ed.), Global media go to war (pp. 39-56). Spokane, WA: Marquette.
3.
AndersonL. (1986). Religion and state in Libya: The politics of identity. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 483, 61-72.
4.
AyishM. (2002). Political communication on Arab world television: Evolving patterns. Political Communication, 19, 137-154.
5.
AyishM. (2008). The new Arab public sphere. Leipzig, Germany: Franke & Timme.
6.
Ball-RokeachS. J (1985). The origins of media-system dependency, Communication Research, 21(3), 3-21.
7.
Ball-RokeachS. JDefleurM. L. (1976). A dependency model of mass media effects. Communication Research, 12, 485-510.
8.
BowenJ. R. (2006). Anti-Americanism as schemas and diacritics in France and Indonesia. In KatzensteinP.Keohane’sR. (Eds.), Anti-Americanisms in world politics (pp. 227-250). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
9.
BoydD. A. (2001). Saudi Arabia’s international media strategy: Influence through multinational ownership. In HefezKai (Ed.), Mass media, politics and society in the Middle East (pp. 43-60). Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
10.
BrewerM. (2001). The many faces of social identity: Implications for political psychology. Political Psychology, 22, 115-116.
11.
CherribiS. (2006). From Baghdad to Paris, Al Jazeera and the veil. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(2), 121-138.
12.
ChoJ.BoyleM. P.KeumH.ShevyM. D.McLeodD. M.ShahD. V.PanZ. (2003). Media, terrorism, and emotionality: Emotional differences in media content and public reactions to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 309-327.
13.
ChoueriY. M. (2000). Arab nationalism: A history. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
14.
CoserL. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
15.
DawishaA. (2003). Arab nationalism in the twentieth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
DawnE. (1988). The formation of Pan-Arab ideology in the interwar years. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 20(1), 67-91.
17.
DittmerL.KimS. (1993). In search of a theory of national identity. In DittmerL.KimS. (Eds.),China’s quest for national identity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18.
DjerejianE. P. (2003, October1). Changing minds, winning peace. A report of the Advisory Group on Public Diplomacy for the Arab and Muslim World, submitted to the Committee on Appropriations of the U.S. House of Representatives. Retrieved from http://www.state.gov/r/adcompd/
19.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
20.
EickelmanD.AndersonJ. W. (1999). Redefining Muslim publics. In EickelmanD.AndersonJ. W. (Eds.), New media in the Muslim world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21.
EntmanR. M. (2008). Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. case. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(2), 87-102.
22.
FandyM. (2007). Uncivil war of words: Media and politics in the Arab world. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
FinnemoreM.SikkinkK. (2001). Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 391-416.
25.
GamsonW. (1992) Talking politics. New York, NY: Cambridge.
26.
GoidelR. K.ShieldsT.PeffleyM. (1997). Priming theory and RAS models: Toward an integrated perspective of media influence. American Politics Quarterly, 25, 287-318.
27.
HastieR.ParkB. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
28.
HafezK. (2001). Mass media in the Middle East: Patterns of political and societal change. In HafezKai (Ed.), Mass media, politics and society in the Middle East (pp.1-20). Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
29.
HowardJ. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 367-395.
30.
HuddyL. (1997). Political identification as social identity. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
31.
HuddyL. (1998). The social nature of political identity: Feminist image and feminist identity. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
32.
HuddyL. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22, 127-156.
33.
HuddyL. (2003). Group identity and political cohesion. In SearsD.HuddyL.JervisR. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 511-558). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
HuntingtonS. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
35.
IserniaP. (2006). Anti-Americanism in Europe during the Cold War. In KatzensteinP.Keohane’sR. (Eds.), Anti-Americanisms in world politics (pp. 57-92). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
36.
IyengarS. (1990). The accessibility bias in politics: Television news and public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2(1), 1-15.
37.
KeohaneR. O.KatzensteinP. J. (2006). Varieties of anti-Americanisms: A framework for analysis. In KatzensteinP.KeohaneR. (Eds.), Anti-Americanisms in world politics (pp. 9-38). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38.
KielyR.BechhoferF.StewartR.McCroneD. (2001). The markers and rules of Scottish national identity. Sociological Review, 49(1), 33-55.
39.
KimS.ScheufeleD. A.ShanahanJ. E. (2002). Agenda-setting, priming, framing and second-levels in local politicsJournalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(1), 7-25.
40.
KohutA.StokesB. (2006). America against the world. New York, NY: Times.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
44.
LynchM. (2006a). Voices of the new Arab public: Iraq, Al-Jazeera, and Middle East politics today. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
45.
LynchM. (2006b). Anti-Americanisms in the Arab world. In KatzensteinP.KeohaneR. (Eds.), Anti-Americanisms in world politics (pp. 196-224). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
46.
McDanielE. L.NooruddinI.ShortleA. F. (2010). Divine boundaries: How religion shapes citizen attitudes toward immigrants. American Politics Research, 38(6), 1-29.
47.
McLeodJ. M.PanZ.RucinskiD. M. (1989). Framing a complex issue: A case of social construction of meaning. Paper presented at the annual conference of the annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
48.
McQuailD. (2000). McQuail’s mass communication theory (4th ed.). London, UK: SAGE.
MilesH. (2005). Al Jazeera: The inside story of the Arab news channel that is challenging the West. New York, NY: Grove.
51.
MoaddelM. (2002). The study of Islamic culture and politics: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 359-386.
52.
MonroeK. R.HankinJ.Van VechtenR. B. (2000). The psychological foundations of identity politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 419-447.
53.
MorganD. L.SchwalbeM. L. (1990). Mind and the self in society—linking social structure and social cognition. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 148-164.
54.
MoyP.ScheufeleD. A.EvelandP.McLeodJ. (2001). Support for the death penalty and rehabilitation: Question order or communication effect?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 2230-2255.
55.
NisbetE. C.MyersT. (2010). Challenging the state: Transnational TV and political identity in the Middle East. Political Communication, 27(4), 1-20.
56.
NisbetE. C.ShanahanJ. (2008). Anti-Americanism as a communication problem? Foreign media and public opinion toward the United States in Europe and the Middle East. American Journal of Media Psychology, 1(1). 7-35.
57.
NisbetE. C.NisbetM. C.ScheufeleD. A.ShanahanJ. (2004). Public diplomacy, television news, and Muslim opinion. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(2), 11-37.
58.
NossekH. (2007). Our news and their news: The role of national identity in the coverage of foreign news. In NossekH.SrebernyA.Sonwalker’sJ.Media and political violence (pp. 41-64) Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
59.
PintakL. (2006). Reflections in a bloodshot lens. London, UK: Pluto.
60.
PollockD. (1992). The Arab street: Public opinion in the Arab world. Washington, DC: Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
61.
PopkinS. (1991). The reasoning voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
62.
PriceV. (1989). Social identification and public opinion: effects of communicating group conflict. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 197-224.
63.
RaziG. H. (1990). Legitimacy, religion, and nationalism in the Middle East. American Political Science Review, 84(1), 69-91.
64.
RughW. (2004). Arab mass media. Westport, CT: Praeger.
65.
SadowskiY. (2006). Political Islam: Asking the wrong questions?Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 215-240.
66.
ScheufeleD. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 297-316.
67.
SeibP. (2005). The news media and “the clash of civilizations.” In Seib’sP. (Ed.), Media and conflict in the twenty-first century (pp. 217-234) New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillian.
68.
SimonB.KlandermansB. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319-331.
69.
TelhamiS. (1993). Arab public opinion and the Gulf War. Political Science Quarterly, 108, 437-452.
70.
TelhamiS. (2002). The stakes: America and the Middle East. Cambridge, MA: Westview.
71.
TelhamiS.BarnettM. (2002). Introduction: Identity and foreign policy in the Middle East. In TelhamiS.BarnettM. (Eds.), Identity and foreign policy in the Middle East (pp. 1-25). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
72.
U. S. Government Accounting Office. (2006, May). 2006 U.S. public diplomacy: State department efforts to engage Muslim audiences lack certain communication elements and face significant challenges (GAO Publication GAO-06-535). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06535.pdf
73.
Van DeburgW. L. (1997). Modern Black nationalism: From Marcus Garvey to Louis Farrakhan. New York: New York University Press.
74.
WalshK. C. (2004). Talking about politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
75.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
76.
ZayaniM. (2005). Introduction: The Al Jazeera phenomenon. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
