In recent years there has been a resurgence of interest both in scholarly communication as a research area and in the application of bibliometrics as a research method. This special issue attempts to review current research that applies bibliometric techniques to research questions in scholarly communication. We consider scholarly communication to be the study of how scholars in any field use and disseminate information through formal and informal channels, whereas bibliometrics is the application of mathematics and statistical methods to books and other media of communication. We propose a matrix for the intersection of these two topics of variables studied (producers, artifacts, and concepts of communication) by research questions asked (characterizing scholarly communities, evolution of scholarly communities, evaluation of scholarly contributions, and the diffusion of ideas). Research in these areas is reviewed, and articles in this issue are set in the context of the matrix. Reliability and validity issues in the application of bibliometrics are reviewed briefly.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bazerman, C.
(1988). Shaping written knowledge:The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
2.
Belkin, N. J.
, & Croft, W. B. (1987). Retrieval techniques. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 22, pp. 109-145). New York: Elsevier.
3.
Beniger, J.
(1988). Information and communication: The new convergence. Communication Research, 15, 198-218.
4.
Callon, M.
, Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Macmillan.
5.
Chubin, D. E.
(1985). Beyond invisible colleges: Inspirations and aspirations of post-1972 social studies of science. Scientometrics, 6, 221-254.
6.
Chubin, D. E.
(1987). Research evaluation and the generation of big science policy. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization. 9, 254-277.
7.
Cole, J.
(1970). Patterns of intellectual influence in scientific research. Sociology of Education, 43, 377-403.
8.
Compton, B.
(1973). Scientific communication. In I. DeS. Pool, W. Schramm, N. Maccoby, & E. B. Parker (Eds.), Handbook of communication (pp. 755-778). Chicago: Rand McNally.
9.
Crane, D.
(1967). The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. American Sociologist, 2(4), 195-201.
10.
Crane, D.
(1969). Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the `invisible college' hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 34, 335-352.
11.
Crane, D.
(1971). Information needs and uses. In C. Cuadra & A. Luke (Eds.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-39). Chicago: American Society for Information Science and Encyclopedia Britannica.
12.
Crane, D.
(1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Dahling, R. L.
(1962). Shannon's information theory: The spread of an idea. In Studies of innovation and of communication to the public (pp. 118-139). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Institute for Communication Research.
14.
Davis, J. M.
(1970). The transmission of information in psychiatry. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science: Vol. 7. The information conscious society (pp. 53-56). Philadelphia: October 11-15.
15.
Delia, J. G.
(1987). Communication research: A history. In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 20-98). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Edge, D. O.
(1979). Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review. History of Science, 17, 102-134.
17.
Ferment in the field
[Special issue]. (1983). Journal of Communication, 33(3).
18.
Garfield, E.
(1964). The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.
19.
Garfield, E.
(1985). In tribute to Derek John de Solla Price: A citation analysis of Little Science, Big Science. Scientometrics, 7, 487-503.
20.
Garfield, E.
, Malin, M. V., & Small, H. (1978). Citation data as science indicators. In Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, R. K. Merton, A. Thackray, &H. Zuckerman (Eds.), Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators (pp. 179-207). New York: John Wiley.
21.
Garvey, W. D.
(1979). Communication: The essence of science. Facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers, and students. New York: Pergamon Press.
22.
Garvey, W. D.
, & Griffith, B. C. (1964). Scientific information exchange in psychology. Science, 146, 1655-1659.
23.
Griffith, B. C.
, & Mullins, N. C. (1972). Coherent groups in scientific change, Science, 177, 959-964.
24.
Hagstrom, W. O.
(1965). The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.
25.
Kessler, M. M.
(1965). Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and analytic subject indexing. American Documentation, 16, 223-233.
26.
Kuhn, T. S.
(1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Kuhn, T. S.
(1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Kuhn, T. S.
(1977). Second thoughts on paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 459-482). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
29.
Latour, B.
, & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
Lievrouw, L. A.
(1988). Four programs of research in scientific communication. Knowledge in Society, 1(2), 6-22.
31.
Lievrouw, L. A.
, Rogers, E. M., Lowe, C. U., & Nadel, E. (1987). Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical sciences. Social Networks, 9, 2217-2248.
32.
MacRoberts, M. H.
, & MacRoberts, B. R. (1987). Testing the Ortega hypothesis: Facts and artifacts. Scientometrics, 12, 293-295.
33.
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (in press). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science.
34.
Meadows, A. J.
(1974). Communication in science. London: Butterworths.
35.
Moravcsik, M. J.
, & Muregesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5, 86-92.
36.
Mullins, N. C. (1966). Social networks among biological scientists. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
37.
Narin, F.
, & Moll, J. K. (1977). Bibliometrics. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 12, pp. 35-58). White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry.
38.
O'Connor, D. O.
, & Voos, H. (1981). Empirical laws, theory construction, and bibliometrics. Library Trends, 30, 9-20.
39.
Paisley, W. J.
(1968). Information needs and uses. In C. Cuadra & A. Luke (Eds.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 3, pp. 1-30). Chicago: American Society for Information Science and Encyclopedia Brittanica.
40.
Paisley, W.
(1984). Communication in the communication sciences. In B. Dervin & M. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in the communication sciences (Vol. 5, pp. 1-43). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41.
Parker, E.
, & Paisley, W. (1966). Research for psychologists at the interface of the scientist and his information system. American Psychologist, 21, 1061-1072.
42.
Price, D. J. deS.
(1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510-515.
43.
Price, D. J. deS.
, & Beaver, D. deB. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21, 1011-1018.
44.
Pritchard, A. (1968). Computers, statistical bibliography and abstracting services. Unpublished manuscript.
45.
Pritchard, A.
(1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25, 348-350.
46.
Pritchard, A.
(1980). Citation analysis vs. use data [Letter to the editor]. Journal of Documentation, 36, 268-269.
47.
Pritchard, A.
, & Wittig, G. (1981). Bibliometrics: A bibliography and index (1874-1959) (Vol. 1). Watford, England: ALLM Books.
48.
Raisig, L. M.
(1962). Statistical bibliography in the health sciences. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 50, 450-461.
49.
Reardon, K. K.
, & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Interpersonal versus mass media communication: A false dichotomy. Human Communication Research, 15, 284-303.
50.
Reeves, B.
, & Borgman, C. L. (1983). A bibliometric evaluation of core journals in communication research. Human Communication Research, 10, 119-136.
51.
Rice, R. E.
, Borgman, C. L., Hart, P. J., & Bednarski, D. (1989). Validity and reliability in journal to journal citation data. Scientometrics, 15, 257-282.
52.
Rice, R. E.
, Borgman, C. L., & Reeves, B. (1988). Citation networks of communication journals, 1977-1985: Cliques and positions, citations made and citations received. Human Communication Research, 15, 256-283.
53.
Small, H. G.
(1973). Co-citation in scientific literature: New measure of relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265-269.
54.
Small, H. G.
(1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 327-340.
55.
Small, H.
(1988). Contributions of citation analysis to understanding scientific communication. In E. M. Rogers (Ed.), 1988 Symposium on Science communication: Environmental and Health Research. Los Angeles: Annenberg School of Communications, University of Southern California.
56.
Small, H.
, & Greenlee, E. (1980). Citation context analysis of a co-citation cluster: Recombinant DNA. Scientometrics, 2, 277-301.
57.
Small, H. G.
, & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literature: I. Identifying and graphing specialities. Science Studies, 4, 17-40.
58.
Smith, L. C.
(1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30, 83-106.
59.
So, C.
(1988). Citation patterns of core communication journals: An assessment of the developmental status of communication. Human Communication Research, 15, 236-255.
60.
Todorov, R.
, & Glanzel, W. (1988). Journal citation measures: A concise review. Journal of Information Science, 14, 47-56.
61.
White, H. D. (1988) Author cocitation studies. Unpublished manuscript, Drexel University, Philadelphia.
62.
White, H. D.
, & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 163-171.
63.
Wiemann, J. M.
, Hawkins, R. P., & Pingree, S. (1988). Fragmentation in the field—and the movement toward integration in communication science. Human Communication Research, 15, 236-255.
64.
Winstanley, M.
(1976). Assimilation into the literature of a critical advance in molecular biology. Social Studies of Science, 6, 545-549.
