This research explored empirical dimensions of sex offender recidivism risk. Study 1 portrayed descriptive statistics and factor structure information concerning actuarial risk instruments and diagnoses derived from a sample of sex offenders being evaluated for civil commitment in Wisconsin. Study 2 used a sample from England and Wales to analyze the relationships between individual risk factors commonly found as items within actuarial scales. Factor structure results from Study 2 conceptually overlapped those found in the first sample, and variables developed from this factor structure predicted sexual reconviction as well. Results from these two studies are discussed in terms of separable components of risk for sexual recidivism and the roles those components may play in processes underlying sexual reoffense.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Langton, C., & Peacock, E. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 28, 490-521.
3.
Butz-Whittaker, J. W., Strassberg, D. S., & The Center for Family Development (2001, November). The Sex Offender Treatment Outcome Predictor-Static/Dynamic (SOTOP-S/D). Poster session presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Antonio, Texas.
4.
Dempster, R. (1999, September). Prediction of sexually violent recidivism: A comparison of risk assessment instruments. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Vancouver, British Columbia.
5.
Dempster, R. J., & Hart, S. D. (2002). The relative utility of fixed and variable risk factors in discriminating sexual recidivists and nonrecidivists. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 121-138.
6.
Doren, D. M. (2000, November). Being accurate about the accuracy of the commonly used risk assessment instruments. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Diego, California.
7.
Douglas, K. S., Klassen, C., Ross, C.Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1998, August). Psychometric properties of HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme in insanity acquittees. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
8.
Epperson, D. L., Kaul, J. D., Huot, S. J., Hesselton, D., Alexander, W., & Goldman, R. (1999). Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool–Revised (MnSOST-R): Development, performance, and recommended risk level cut scores. Retrieved from http://psych-server.iastate.edu/faculty/epperson/
9.
Gretton, H. M., McBride, M., & Hare, R. D. (1995, October). Psychopathy in adolescent sex offenders: A follow-up study. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, New Orleans, Louisiana.
10.
Gretton, H. M., McBride, M., Hare, R. D., & O'Shaughnessy, R. (2000, November). The developmental course of offending in psychopathic and nonpsychopathic adolescent sexual offenders: A ten year follow up study. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Diego, California.
11.
Hanson, R. K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. Ottawa: Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada.
12.
Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
13.
Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.
14.
Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
15.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., Lalumière, M. L., Boer, D. & Lang, C. (2001). A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Manuscript submitted for publication.
16.
Hudson, S. M., Ward, T., & McCormack, J. C. (1999). Offense pathways in sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 779-798.
17.
Knight, R. A. (1999, September). Unified theory of sexual coercion. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Lake Buena Vista, Florida.
18.
Kropp, P. R. (2000, November). The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP). Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Diego, California.
19.
Nicholaichuk, T. P., & Yates, P. (2002). Treatment efficacy: Outcomes for the Clearwater Sex Offender Program. In B. Schwartz (Ed.), The sex offender, Volume 4 (pp. 7-1–7-18). New York: Civic Research Institute.
20.
Proulx, J. (2000, November). Why subtypes of sexual aggressors of children differ as to their offending process. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Diego, California.
21.
Proulx, J., Perrealt, C., & Ouimet, M. (1999). Pathways in the offending process of extrafamilial sexual child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 117-129.
22.
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23.
Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1997). Cross-validation and extension of the violence risk appraisal guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231-241.
24.
Serin, R. C., Mailloux, D. L., & Malcolm, P. B. (2001). Psychopathy, deviant sexual arousal, and recidivism among sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 234-246.
25.
Seto, M. C., & Lalumière, M. L. (2001). A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 15-25.
26.
Smallbone, S. W., & Dadds, M. R. (2000). Attachment and coercive sexual behavior. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Researchand Theory, 12, 3-15.
27.
Webster, C. D., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Cormier, C., & Quinsey, V. L. (1994). The violence prediction scheme: Assessing dangerousness in high risk men. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto, Centre of Criminology.
