Approximately 1.3 million men and 93,000 women are currently detained in state and federal correctional facilities. The ability to identify upon admission to a correctional facility those individuals who either have or are at an increased risk for developing significant psychological difficulties is crucial in order to allow early detection of inmates requiring mental health services. This study investigates the frequency with which 34,281 male and 6,878 female inmates from a state corrections facility reported significant levels of distress and dysfunction upon intake to the correctional system as measured by various clinical scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Results indicate that a substantial proportion of incarcerated adults reported significant levels of distress across a variety of psychological, social, and behavioral domains.
Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer B. K. (2001). MMPI-2 (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2.
Butcher, J. N., & Rouse, S. V. (1996). Personality: Individual differences and clinical assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 87-111.
3.
Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., & Puente, A. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 31, 141-154.
4.
Dahlstrom, W. G., Welsh, G. S., & Dahlstom, L. E. (1975). An MMPI handbook: Vol. II. Research applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1674.
6.
Dorfman, W. I., & Leonard, S. (2001). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). In W. I. Hersen & M. Hersen (Eds.), Understanding psychological assessment (pp. 145-171). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
7.
Forbey, J. D., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2002). Use of the MMPI-2 in the treatment of offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 308-318.
8.
Graham, J. R. (2000). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323.
10.
Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-30.
11.
Lachar, D. (1974). Prediction of early U.S. Air Force cadet adaptation with the MMPI. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 21, 404-408.
12.
Marchese, M. C. (1992). Clinical versus actuarial prediction: A review of the literature. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 75, 583-594.
13.
Megargee, E. I., Bohn, M., Jr., Meyer, J., Jr., & Sink, F. (1979). Classifying criminal offenders: A new system based on the MMPI. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Megargee, E. I., & Carbonell, J. L. (1995). Use of the MMPI-2 in correctional settings. In Y. S. Ben-Porath, J. R. Graham, G. C. N. Hall, R. D. Hirshman, & M. S. Zaragoza (Eds.), Forensic applications of the MMPI-2 (pp. 127-159). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Megargee, E. I., Carbonell, J. L., Bohn, M. J., & Sliger, G. L. (2001). Classifying criminal offenders with the MMPI-2: The Megargee system. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
Morris, S. M., Steadman, H. J., & Veysey, B. M. (1997). Mental health services in United States jails: A survey of innovative practices. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 3-19.
17.
Richard, L. S., Wakefield, J. A., & Lewak, R. (1990). Similarity of personality variables as predictors of marital satisfaction: A Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) inventory analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 39-43.
18.
Strupp, H. H., & Bloxom, A. L. (1975). An approach to defining a patient population in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 22, 231-237.
19.
U.S. Department of Justice. (1999). Bureau of Justice Statistics special report: Mental health treatment of inmates and probationers. Washington, DC: Author.
20.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2001). Bureau of Justice Statistics special report: Mental health treatment in state prisons, 2000. Washington, DC: Author.
21.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2002). Bureau of Justice Statistics bulletin: Prisoners in 2001. Washington, DC: Author.
22.
Wilkinson, R. A. (2000). Mental health care for Ohio state prisoners: The view from the director’s office. Correctional mental health report, January/February 2000. Retrieved August 15, 2002, from http://www.civicresearchinstitute.com/bh2.html
