The prediction of recidivism of female offenders has lagged behind that of their male counterparts. The present study was designed to extend the work of previous research on the Level of Service Inventory—Revised (LSI-R) and to examine the utility of another measure—the Childhood and Adolescent Taxon Scale (CAT)—in the prediction of recidivism among female offenders. Participants, 100 female offenders serving sentences of more than 2 years in Canada, completed a self-report version of both instruments. Results indicated acceptable reliability and predictive validity for both measures, and both measures distinguished recidivists from nonrecidivists. Results are discussed in light of previous research and future directions for the examination of the prediction of recidivism among female offenders.
Adelburg, E., & Currie, C. (Eds.). (1987). Too few to count: Canadian women in conflict with the law. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Press Gang Publishers.
2.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J.L. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory—Revised: User's manual. Toronto, Ontario Canada: Multi-Health Systems .
3.
Belcourt, R., Nouwens, T., and Lefebvre, L. (1993). Examining the unexamined: Recidivism among female offenders. Forum on Corrections Research, 5(3), 10-14.
4.
Bonta, J., Dauvergne, M., & Rugge, T. (2003). The reconviction rate of federal offenders (User Report No. 2003-02). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Solicitor General Canada.
5.
Bonta, J., Harman, W.G., Hann, R.G., & Cormier, R.B. (1996). The prediction of recidivism among federally sentenced offenders: A re-evaluation study of the SIR scale. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 38, 61-79.
6.
Bonta, J., Pang, B., & Wallace-Capretta, S. (1995). Predictors of recidivism among incarcerated female offenders. The Prison Journal, 75, 277-294.
7.
Canfield, C. (1989). The parole process and risk upon release for the female offender (User Report No. 1989-10). Ottawa, Ontario , Canada: Solicitor General of Canada.
8.
Correctional Service Canada. (2005). Basic facts about the Correctional Service of Canada (Cat. No. JS 82-17/2005) . Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Works and Government Services Canada.
9.
Coulson, G., Ilacqua, G., Nutbrown, V., Giulekas, D., & Cudjoe, F. (1996). Predictive utility of the LSI for incarcerated female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 427-439.
10.
Finn, A., Trevethan, S., Carrière, G., & Kowalski, M. (1996). Female inmates, Aboriginal inmates and inmates serving life sentences: A one day snapshot (Cat. No. 85-002, Vol. 19, No. 5). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Statistics Canada.
11.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the “unparalleled” measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 397-426.
12.
Hann, R.G., & Harman, W.G. (1989). Release risk prediction: Testing the Nuffield scoring system for native and female inmates. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Supply and Services Canada.
13.
Hare, R.D. (1991). The Hare Psycholopathy Checklist—Revised (manual). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems .
14.
Hare, R.D. (1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 25-54.
15.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., & Camilleri, J.A. (2004). Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Assessment Guide) to nonforensic patients. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1063-1074.
16.
Kroner, D.G., & Loza, W. (2001). Evidence for the efficacy of self-report in predicting nonviolent and violent criminal recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 168-177.
17.
Kroner, D.G., & Mills, J.F. (2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconducts and new convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 471-489.
18.
Laishes, J. (2002). The 2002 Mental Health Strategy for Women Offenders . Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Mental Health Services, Correctional Services Canada.
19.
Loo, R. ( 2002). A caveat on using single-item versus multiple item scales . Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(1), 68-75.
20.
Loucks, A. (1995). Criminal behavior, violent behavior, and prison maladjustment in federal female offenders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
21.
Lowenkamp, C.T., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. (2001). Risk/need assessment, offender classification, and the role of childhood abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 28, 543-563.
22.
Loza, W., Loza-Fanous, A., & Heseltine, K. (in press). The myth of offenders' deception on self-report measures predicting recidivism: Example from the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ) . Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
23.
Loza, W., Neo, L.H., Shahinfar, A., & Loza-Fanous, A. (2005). Cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: A tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism with female offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 547-560.
24.
Loza, W., & Simourd, D. (1994). Psychometric evaluation of the Level of Service Inventory (LSI) among male Canadian federal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 468-480.
25.
McConnell, B.A. (1996). The prediction of female federal offender recidivism with the Level of Supervision Inventory. Unpublished thesis, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
26.
Mills, J.F., Loza, W., & Kroner, D.G. (2003). Predictive validity despite social desirability: Evidence for the robustness of self-report among offenders. Criminal Behavior andMental Health, 13, 144-154.
27.
Motiuk, M.S., Motiuk, L.L., & Bonta, J. (1992). A comparison between self-report and interview-based inventories in offender classification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19, 143-159.
28.
Neary, A.M. (1990). DSM-III and Psychopathy Checklist assessment of antisocial personality disorder in Black and White female felons [Abstract] . Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(7-B), 3605.
29.
Nuffield, J. (1982). Parole decision-making in Canada: Research towards decision guidelines. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Supply and Services Canada.
Rettinger, L.J. (1998). A recidivism follow-up study investigating the risk and need within a sample of provincially sentenced women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
32.
Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.
33.
Simourd, D. (2004). Use of dynamic risk/need assessment instruments among long-term incarcerated offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 306-323.
34.
U.S. Department of Justice. (n.d.). Bureau of Justice statistics. Retrieved November 3, 2005, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs
35.
Vitale, J.E., Smith, S.S., Brinkley, C.A., & Newman, J.P. (2002). The reliability and validity of the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in a sample of female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 98, 202-231.
