This study focuses on the relationship between the experience of justice, belief in a just world (BJW), and the feelings of adult male prisoners. The sample comprised 100 adult male prisoners from a German prison. Regression analysis provided evidence for the assimilation function of the BJW: High believers evaluated the legal proceedings, their interpersonal treatment by their corrections officers, and decisions on prison affairs as more just; they reported better well-being and were less likely to express anger as outburst behavior. Interpersonal justice was particularly important in explaining well-being. The results persisted when controlling for social desirability, criminal background, and personal background. The role of BJW and interpersonal justice as a resource for adaptive social behavior and subjective well-being is discussed.
Bulman, R.J., & Wortman, C.B. (1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the “real world”: Severe accident victims react to their lot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 351-363.
2.
Comer, R., & Laird, J.D. (1975). Choosing to suffer as a consequence of expecting to suffer: Why do people do it?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 92-101.
3.
Dalbert, C. (1992). Subjektives Wohlbefinden junger Erwachsener: Theoretische und empirische Analysen der Struktur und Stabilität [Young adults' subjective well-being: Theoretical and empirical analyses of its structure and stability] . Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie , 13, 207-220.
4.
Dalbert, C. (1996). Über den Umgang mit Ungerechtigkeit Eine psychologische Analyse [Dealing with injustice. A psychological analysis]. Bern, Germany : Huber.
5.
Dalbert, C. (1997). Coping with an unjust fate: The case of structural unemployment. Social Justice Research, 10, 175-189.
6.
Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the Personal Belief in a Just World Scale's validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79-98.
7.
Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
8.
Dalbert, C. (2002). Beliefs in a just world as a buffer against anger . Social Justice Research, 15, 123-145.
9.
Dalbert, C., & Stoeber, J. (2006). The belief in a just world and domain-specific beliefs about justice at school and in the family: A longitudinal study with adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development , 30, 200-207.
10.
Dzuka, J., & Dalbert, C. (2002). Mental health and personality of Slovak unemployed adolescents: About the beliefs in a just world's impact. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 732-757.
11.
Emler, N., & Reicher, S. (2005). Delinquency: Cause or consequence of social exclusion? In D. Abrams, J. Marques, & M. Hogg (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 211-241). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
12.
Furnham, A., & Procter, E. (1989). Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 365-384.
13.
Hafer, C.L., & Correy, B.L. (1999). Mediators of the relation of beliefs in a just world and emotional responses to negative outcomes. Social Justice Research, 12, 189-204.
14.
Haller, V., Machura, S., & Bierhoff, H.-W. (1995). Urteil und Verfahrensgerechtigkeit aus der Perspektive jugendlicher Strafgefangener [Sentence and procedural justice in the view of adolescent prisoners]. In G. Bierbrauer, W. Gottwald, & B. Birnbreier-Stahlberger (Eds.), Verfahrensgerechtigkeit (pp. 111-137). Köln, Germany: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt.
15.
Lerner, M.J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer's reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 355-360.
16.
Lerner, M.J., & Miller, D.T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin,85, 1030-1051.
17.
Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
18.
Lipkus, I.M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I.C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666-677.
19.
Lipkus, I.M., & Siegler, I.C. (1993). The belief in a just world and perceptions of discrimination. Journal of Psychology, 127, 465-474.
20.
Lupfer, M.B., Doan, K.A., & Houston, D.A. (1998). Explaining unfair and fair outcomes: The therapeutic value of attributional analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 495-511.
21.
Mikula, G. (2005). Some observations and critical thoughts about the present state of justice theory and research. In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner, D. Skarlicki, & K. van den Bos (Eds.), What motivates fairness in organizations (pp. 197-209). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
22.
Musch, J., Brockhaus, R., & Bröder, A. (2002). Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von zwei Faktoren sozialer Erwünschtheit [An inventory for the assessment of two factors of social desirability] . Diagnostica, 48, 121-129.
23.
Otto, K., & Dalbert, C. (2005). Belief in a just world and its functions for young prisoners. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 559-573.
24.
Paulhus, D.L. (1994). Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Reference manual for BIDR Version 6. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Sutton, R.M., & Douglas, K.M. (2005). Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the self—other distinction in just-world beliefs . Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 637-645.
29.
Tyler, T.R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendants' evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law and Society Review, 18, 51-74.
