With the 2006 passage of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act (AWA), the U.S. Congress set forth a range of minimum standards governing the operation of sex offender registration and notification (SORN) systems throughout the nation. Many of these standards are based on the AWA’s uniform system of registrant classification, which distinguishes registrants solely based on offense history and the nature of the conviction offense, without regard for additional risk factors. The current study evaluates the impact of the federal registration classification system on the distribution of individuals within state sex offender registries, specifically drawing on the experiences of Ohio and Oklahoma, two of the first states to undertake a reclassification of their registrant populations under the new federal guidelines. The findings indicate that the federal reclassification process produces a redistribution of registrants from lower SORN levels to higher ones and reveals statistically significant differences between newly reclassified “high-risk” individuals and those designated as high risk under prior registration classification systems. Findings also suggest that juveniles and those potentially subject to AWA’s retroactivity provisions may be disproportionately placed into the highest SORN tiers. Implications of these findings for practice and public policy are discussed.
ACLU of Nevada v. Masto, 2:2008cv00822 (D. Nev., October 7, 2008).
2.
Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, 42 U.S.C. § 16901 et seq. (2006).
3.
Burchfield, K., & Mingus, W. ( 2008). Not in my neighborhood: Assessing registered sex offenders’ experiences with local social capital and social control . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 356-374.
4.
California Sex Offender Management Board. ( 2009, January). Adam Walsh Act: Statement of position. Retrieved November 19, 2009, from http://www.casomb.org/docs/Adam%20Walsh%20Position%20Paper.pdf
5.
Center for Sex Offender Management. (2008). Twenty strategies for advancing sex offender management in your jurisdiction . Silver Spring, MD: Center for Effective Public Policy.
6.
Chaffin, M. ( 2008). Our minds are made up-Don’t confuse us with the facts: Commentary on policies concerning children with sexual behavior problems and juvenile sex offenders. Child Maltreatment, 13, 110-121.
7.
Epperson, D., Kaul, J., Huot, S., Hesselton, D., Alexander, W., & Goldman, R. ( 2004, March 1). Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSost-R): Development, performance, and recommended risk level cut scores . Retrieved March 1, 2004, from http://www.psychology.iastate.edu/faculty/epperson
8.
Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R., & Chaffin, M. ( 2009). Juveniles who commit sex offenses against minors . Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
9.
Freeman, N., & Sandler, J. ( 2009). The Adam Walsh Act: A false sense of security or an effective public policy initiative?Criminal Justice Policy Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0887403409338565
10.
Hanson, R., & Harris, A. ( 2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 13, 105-122.
11.
Hanson, R., Morton, K., & Harris, A. ( 2003). Sexual offender recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences , 989, 154-166.
12.
Hanson, R., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
13.
Harris, A.J.R., & Hanson, R.K. ( 2004). Sex offender recidivism: A simple question. Ottawa: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada .
14.
Harris, A.J., & Lobanov-Rostovsky, C. (2009). Implementing the Adam Walsh Act’s sex offender registration and notification provisions: A survey of the states. Criminal Justice Policy Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0887403409346118
15.
Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 14071 (1994, Supp. IV 1998).
16.
Jacob Wetterling Improvements Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-119, 111 Stat. 2440 (1997).
17.
Kruttschnitt, C., Uggen, C., & Shelton, K. ( 2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly , 17(1), 61-88.
18.
Letourneau, E., Levenson, J., Bandyopadhyay, D., Armstrong, K., & Sinha, D. (in press). The effects of public registration on judicial decisions. Criminal Justice Review.
19.
Letourneau, E., & Miner, M.H. ( 2005). Juvenile sex offenders: A case against the legal and clinical status quo. Sexual Abuse, 17, 293-312.
20.
Levenson, J., & Cotter, L. ( 2005). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 168-178.
21.
Levenson, J., D’Amora, D., & Hern, A. ( 2007). Megan’s Law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25, 587-602.
22.
Logan, W. ( 2009). Knowledge as power: Criminal registration and community notification laws in America. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.
23.
Logan, W.A. ( 2008). Criminal justice federalism and national sex offender policy. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Justice, 6, 51.
24.
Matson, S., & Lieb, R. ( 1996). Sex offender community notification: A review of laws in 32 states. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
25.
McGrath, R., & Hoke, S. ( 2002). Vermont Assessment of Sex Offender Risk Manual (Vol. 2005). Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://www.csom.org/pubs/VASOR.pdf
26.
Megan’s Law, Public Law 104-45, Stat 110 (1996).
27.
Mercado, C., Alvarez, S., & Levenson, J. ( 2008). The impact of specialized sex offender legislation on community re-entry. Sexual Abuse, 20, 188-205.
28.
National Alliance to End Sexual Violence. ( 2007). Legislative analysis: The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from http://www.naesv.org/Policypapers/Adam_Walsh_SumMarch07.pdf
29.
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. ( 2009, December 23). Registered sex offenders in the United States . Retrieved December 23, 2009, from http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/documents/sex-offender-map.pdf
30.
National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics. (2009). SEARCH survey on state compliance with the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA). Sacramento, CA. Retrieved December 3, 2009, from http://www.search.org/files/pdf/SORNA-StateComplianceSurvey2009.pdf
31.
Office of the Ohio Public Defender. (2009). Adam Walsh Act: Attorney information. Retrieved November 23, 2009, from http://www.opd.ohio.gov/AWA_Attorney_Forms/AWA__Attorney_Forms.htm
32.
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. ( 2007). Best practices tool-kit: Sex offender registration and notification. Columbus: Author . Retrieved September 17, 2009, from http://www.drc.ohio.gov/web/iej_files/SO_RegistrationNotification.pdf
33.
Ohio Office of Criminal Justice Services. ( 2006). Report to the Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission: Sex offenders. Columbus: Author.
34.
Ohio Senate Bill 10, Ohio Revised Code §§ 2950 (2007).
35.
Prescott, D., & Levenson, J. ( 2007). Youth who have sexually abused: Registration, recidivism, and risk. ATSA Forum, 18(2).
36.
Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to end the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003, Pub. L. No. 108-21, 117 Stat. 650 (2003).
37.
Tewksbury, R. ( 2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 67-82.
38.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2008). The national guidelines for sex offender registration and notification: Final guidelines. Retrieved October 8, 2009, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/smart/pdfs/final_sornaguidelines.pdf
39.
U.S. Department of Justice, (2009, September 23). Justice Department announces first two jurisdictions to implement Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (Press release). Washington, DC: Author.
40.
Willis, G., & Grace, R. ( 2009). Assessment of community reintegration planning for sex offenders: Poor planning predicts recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 494-512.
41.
Willis, G., & Grace, R. ( 2008). The quality of community reintegration planning for child molesters: Effects on sexual recidivism. Sexual Abuse, 20, 218-240.
