Deferring to Clarity,Parsimony,and Evidence in Reply to Ward,Yates,and Willis

Andrews D. A. (1980). Some experimental investigations of the principles of differential association through deliberate manipulation of the structure of service systems. American Sociological Review, 45, 448-462.

Andrews D. A. Bonta J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory–Revised. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.

Andrews D. A. Bonta J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis Matthew Bender.

Andrews D. A. Bonta J. Hoge R. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.

Andrews D. A. Bonta J. Wormith J. S. (2004). Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI): An offender assessment system. User’s manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.

Andrews D. A. Bonta J. Wormith J. S. (2011). The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model: Does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 735-755. doi:10.1177/009385481140635610.1177/0093854811406356

Andrews D. A. Guzzo L. Raynor P. Rowe R. Rettinger L. J. Brews A. Wormith J. S. (2011). Are the major risk/need factors predictive of both female and male reoffending? A test with the eight domains of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. doi:10.1177/0306624X1039571610.1177/0306624X10395716

Andrews D. A. Zinger I. Hoge R. D. Bonta J. Gendreau P. Cullen F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.

Bonta J. (2011). Obituary: Donald Arthur Andrews, 13 June 1941–22 October, 1010. Psychology, Crime and Law, 17, 93-95. doi:10.1177/009385480832153210.1177/0093854808321532

Bonta J. Bourgon G. Rugge T. Scott T.-L. Yessine A. K. Gutierrez L. Li J. (2011). An experimental demonstration of training probation officers in evidence-based community supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1127-1148.

Campbell M. A. French S. Gendreau P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 567-590. doi:10.1177/009385480933361010.1177/0093854809333610

Cullen F. T. (2011). Beyond adolescence-limited criminology: Choosing our future. The American Society of Criminology 2010 Sutherland Address. Criminology, 49, 287-330. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00224.x10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00224.x

Cullen F. T. Gendreau P. (2001). From nothing works to what works: Changing professional ideology in the 21st century.Federal Probation, 66, 43-49.

Cumming G. Finch S. (2005). Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. AmericanPsychologist, 60, 170-180. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.17010.1037/0003-066X.60.2.170

Davidson W. Gottschalk L. Gensheimer L. Mayer J. (1984). Interventions with juvenile delinquents: A meta-analysisof treatment efficacy. Washington, DC: National Institute of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

Flagel D. C. Gendreau P. (2008). Commentary: Sense, common sense, and nonsense. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1354-1361. doi:10.1177/009385480832153210.1177/0093854808321532

Gendreau P. (1996). The rehabilitation of offenders: What we know and what has to be done. Criminal Justice andBehavior, 23, 144-161.

Gendreau P. Andrews D. A. Thériault Y. L. (2010). Correctional Program Assessment Inventory–2010 (CPAI-2010). Scoring manual. Beresford, New Brunswick, Canada.

Gendreau P. Goggin C. Smith P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the “unparalleled” measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 397-426.

Gendreau P. Goggin C. Cullen F. T. Paparozzi M. (2002). The Common Sense Revolution and correctional policy. In McGuire J. (Ed.). (2002). Offender rehabilitation and treatment: Effective programs and policies to reduce re-offending (pp. 360-386). Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons.

Gendreau P. Ross R. R. (1979). Effective correctional treatment: Bibliotherapy for cynics. Crime & Delinquency, 25, 463-489.

Gendreau P. Smith P. (2007). Influencing the “people who count”: Some perspectives on the reportingof meta-analytic results for prediction and treatment outcomes with offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1536-1559. doi:10.1177/009385480730702510.1177/0093854807307025

Gendreau P. Smith P. Thériault Y. L. (2009). Chaos theory and correctional treatment: Common sense, correctional quackery, and the law of fartcatchers. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 25, 384-396. doi:10.1177/104398620934455210.1177/1043986209344552

Hogg S. M. (2011). The Level of Service Inventory (Ontario Revision) scale validation for gender and ethnicity: Addressing reliability and predictive validity (Unpublished MA dissertation). University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Hunter J. E. Schmidt F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

Latessa E. J. Cullen F. T. Gendreau P. (2002). Beyond correctional quackery: Professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment. Federal Probation, 66, 43-49.

Lipsey M.W. (1989, November). The efficacy of intervention for juvenile delinquency: Results from 400 studies. Paper presented at the 41st annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Reno, NV.

Lowenkamp C. T. Latessa E. J. Smith P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 575-594.

Luong D. Wormith J. S. (2011). Applying risk/need assessment to probation practice and its impact on the recidivism of young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1177-1199.

Martinson R. (1974). What works?—Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 35, 22-54.

Maruna S. LeBel T. P. (2010). The desistance paradigm in correctional practice: From programmes to lives. In McNeil F. Raynor P. Trotter C. (Eds.), Offender supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice (pp. 65-87). New York, NY: Willan.

Maruna S. LeBel T. P. Mitchell N Naples M. (2004). Pygmalion in the reintegration process: Desistence from crime through the looking glass. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 271-281. doi:10.1080/1068316041000166276210.1080/10683160410001662762

National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2011). Treating offenders with drug problems: Integrating public health and public safety. A research update from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nida.nih.gov/pdf/tib/drugs_crime.pdf

Rosenthal R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Ross R. Fabiano E. (1985). Time to think: A cognitive model of delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation. Johnson City, TN: Institute of Social Sciences and Arts.

Schmidt F. L. (1992). What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173-1181.

Schmidt F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for the training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.

Scoones C. D. Willis G. M. Grace R. C. (2011). Beyond static and dynamic risk factors: The incremental validity of release planning for predicting sex offender recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/088626051141647210.1177/0886260511416472

Smith P. Gendreau P. Swartz K. (2009). Validating the principles of effective intervention: A systematic review of the contributions of meta-analysis in the field of corrections. Victims and Offenders, 4, 148-169. doi:10.1080/1556488080261258110.1080/15564880802612581

Tong L. S. J. Farrington D. P. (2006). How effective is the “Reasoning and Rehabilitation” programme in reducing reoffending? A meta-analysis of evaluations in four countries. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 3-24. doi:10.1080u1068316051233131625310.1080u10683160512331316253

Yates P. Ward T. (2008). Good Lives, Self-Regulation, and Risk Management: An Integrated Model of Sexual Offender Assessment and Treatment. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand, 1, 2-19.

Vose B. Cullen F. T. Smith P. (2008). The empirical status of the Level of Service Inventory. Federal Probation, 72, 22-29.

Ward T. Melser J. Yates P. M. (2007). Reconstructing the risk-need-responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 208-228. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.07.00110.1016/j.avb.2006.07.001

Ward T. Yates P. M. Willis G. M. (2012).The good lives model and the risk-need-responsivity model: A critical response to Andrews, Bonta, and Wormith (2011). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 94-110.

Whitehead P. R. Ward T. Collie R. M. (2007). Time for a change: Applying the good lives model of rehabilitation to a high-risk violent offender. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 578-598. doi:10.1177/0306624X0629623610.1177/0306624X06296236

Wilkinson L. , with the Task Force on Statistical Inference, APA Board of Scientific Affairs. (1999). Statistical methods inpsychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.

Willis G. W. Ward T. (2010). Striving for a good life: The good lives model applied to released child molesters. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(3), 290-303. doi:10.1080/13552600.2010.50534910.1080/13552600.2010.505349

Wormith J. S. (1984). Attitude and behavior change in correctional clientele: A three year follow-up. Criminology, 22, 595-618.

Wormith J. S. (2011). The legacy of D. A. Andrews in the field of criminal justice: How theory and research can change policy and practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 78-82.