“Knowing and Working With Someone Who Has Made It Means I’m Going to Make It Too”: Experiential Knowledge as a Catalyst for Transformation in Reentry and Beyond
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2025
“Knowing and Working With Someone Who Has Made It Means I’m Going to Make It Too”: Experiential Knowledge as a Catalyst for Transformation in Reentry and Beyond
Of the 2.2 million adults incarcerated in the United States, between 600,000 and 700,000 return to society annually. The U.S. federal evaluations reveal over a quarter of these individuals are rearrested within 6 months, while studies in more than 40 states find that close to half are reincarcerated within 3 years. Recidivism rates reveal a pressing need to understand reentry from the perspective of those who have experienced it. This study analyzes interviews with previously incarcerated individuals, identifying four key categories of experiential knowledge: impact of clinical staff, re-entry programming staff, mentors, and founder’s experiences. Experiential knowledge, and understandings acquired through direct personal experience, emerge as pivotal in supporting successful reintegration. The discussion highlights its impact beyond reentry, aligning with individuals’ aspirations to help others. By emphasizing the significance of experiential knowledge, conclusions advocate for its integration into re-entry programs to enhance support and services for justice-involved individuals.
AlbertA. (2024). “Social workers by day and terrorists by night?” Wounded healers, restorative justice, and ex-prisoner reentry. Punishment & Society, 26(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/146247452312081
2.
AlexanderM. (2020). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.
BaillergeauE.DuyvendakJ. W. (2016). Experiential knowledge as a resource for coping with uncertainty: Evidence and examples from the Netherlands. Health, Risk & Society, 18(7-8), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2016.1269878
5.
BeckettK. (2022). Ending mass incarceration: Why it persists and how to achieve meaningful reform. Oxford University Press.
6.
BedellP.WilsonJ. L.WhiteA. M.MorseD. S. (2015). “Our commonality is our past”: A qualitative analysis of re-entry community health workers’ meaningful experiences. Health & Justice, 3(19), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-015-0031-5
7.
BellinJ. (2022). Incarceration nation: How the United States became addicted to prisons and jails and how it can recover. Cambridge University Press.
8.
BozkurtS. S.MericoM.ArestiA.DarkeS. (2020). Crossing borders, pushing boundaries and privileging “marginalised” voices: Surviving motherhood and prison. In Convict criminology for the future (pp. 21–34). Routledge.
CrenshawK. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
17.
CrenshawK. W. (2017). On intersectionality: Essential writings. The New Press.
18.
DavisA. Y. (1983). Women, race & class. Vintage.
19.
DavisA. Y. (2011). Blues legacies and black feminism: Gertrude Ma Rainey, Bessie Smith, and Billie Holiday. Vintage.
20.
DuroseM. R.AntenangeliL. (2021). Recidivism of prisoners released in 34 states in 2012: A 5-year follow-up period (2012–2017). Bureau of Justice Statistics.
21.
DuroseM. R.CooperA. D.SnyderH. N. (2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010 (Vol. 28). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/rprts05p0510.pdf
22.
ElishaE. (2022). Inmates in the role of the “wounded healer”: The virtuous of peer-to-peer programs in prison. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 11, 11–14. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2022.11.02
23.
ElishaE. (2023). Ex-convicts in an official role of peer-supporters: Toward convict therapy. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 67(15), 1565–1580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X231159890
24.
EnnsP. K. (2014). The public’s increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 857–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12098
25.
EsterbergK. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. McGraw Hill.
26.
EvansD. N.SzkolaJ.St JohnV. (2019). Going back to college? Criminal stigma in higher education admissions in Northeastern U.S. Critical Criminology, 27(2), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09443-x
FaulknerA. (2017). Survivor research and mad studies: The role and value of experiential knowledge in mental health research. Disability & Society, 32(4), 500–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1302320
29.
FeldmanM. S. (1995). Strategies for interpreting qualitative data. Sage.
30.
FrankelA.DePoyE. (2023). Thoughts beyond stigma-implications for change reflected in the voices of previously incarcerated citizens. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology. https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.497f21ab
31.
FranklinT. W. (2013). Sentencing native Americans in US federal courts: An examination of disparity. Justice Quarterly, 30(2), 310–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.605072
32.
FreireP. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum. (Original work published in 1968)
33.
GunnA. J. (2022). Stigma, surveillance, and wounded healing: Promoting a critical ethics of care in research with formerly incarcerated Black women. Journal of Community Psychology, 50(8), 3438–3454. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22845
34.
GunnA. J.HardestyM.OverstreetN.WallaceS. (2022). “Every time I tell my story I learn something new”: Voice and inclusion in research with Black women with histories of substance use and incarceration. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 22(4), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895821100582
35.
HalkovicA.GreeneA. C. (2015). Bearing stigma, carrying gifts: What colleges can learn from students with incarceration experience. The Urban Review, 47(4), 759–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0333-x
36.
HallD.LeeL.-W.ManseauM. W.PopeL.WatsonA. C.ComptonM. T. (2019). Major mental illness as a risk factor for incarceration. Psychiatric Services, 70(12), 1088–1093. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800425
HarawayD. (2013). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge (Original work published in 1991)
39.
HardingS. G. (1986). The science question in feminism. Cornell University Press.
40.
HardingS. G. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.
41.
HeidemannG.CederbaumJ. A.MartinezS.LeBelT. P. (2016). Wounded healers: How formerly incarcerated women help themselves by helping others. Punishment & Society, 18(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474515623101
42.
HenneK.TroshynskiE. I. (2013). Mapping the margins of intersectionality: Criminological possibilities in a transnational world. Theoretical Criminology, 17(4), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480613494990
43.
HenneK.TroshynskiE. I. (2019). Intersectional criminologies for the contemporary moment: Crucial questions of power, praxis, and technologies of control. Critical Criminology, 27(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09441-z
44.
HeteyR. C.EberhardtJ. L. (2018). The numbers don’t speak for themselves: Racial disparities and the persistence of inequality in the criminal justice system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418763931
45.
HlavkaH.WheelockD.JonesR. (2015). Exoffender accounts of successful reentry from prison. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 54(6), 406–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2015.1057630
46.
hooksb. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Pluto Press.
47.
hooksb. (2014). Teaching to transgress. Routledge.
48.
IllichI. (1976). Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health. Pantheon Books.
49.
KenemoreT. K.InB. S. (2020). Relationship matters with citizens returning from prison: Qualitative findings from a mentoring program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 59(6), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2020.1767257
50.
KjellstrandJ.ClarkM.CafferyC.SmithJ.EddyJ. M. (2022). Reentering the community after prison: Perspectives on the role and importance of social support. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(2), 176–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09596-4
51.
KjellstrandJ.MatulisJ.JacksonA.SmithJ.EddyJ. M. (2023). The importance of positive social support during reentry from prison: Examining the role of volunteer mentoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 67(5), 567–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211059316
52.
KlassD.ShinnersB. (1983). Professional roles in a self-help group for the bereaved. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 13(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.2190/VE7L-7ULX-CR86-50U2
LauriaM.SlotterbackC. S. (Eds.). (2020). Learning from Arnstein’s ladder: From citizen participation to public engagement. Routledge.
55.
LeBelT. P. (2007). An examination of the impact of formerly incarcerated persons helping others. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 46(1–2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670802071485
56.
LeBelT. P.RichieM.MarunaS. (2015). Helping others as a response to reconcile a criminal past: The role of the wounded healer in prisoner reentry programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814550029
57.
MarunaS. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American Psychological Association.
MizelM. L.AbramsL. S. (2020). Practically emotional: Young men’s perspectives on what works in reentry programs. Journal of Social Service Research, 46(5), 658–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2019.1617225
NixonS. (2020). “Giving back and getting on with my life”: Peer mentoring, desistance and recovery of ex-offenders. Probation Journal, 67(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550519900249
64.
O’HanlonR.BroomeJ. (2022). The experiences of older formerly incarcerated adults in a specialized reentry program during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 61(6), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2022.2081647
65.
OrtizJ. M.JackeyH. (2019). The system is not broken, it is intentional: The prisoner reentry industry as deliberate structural violence. The Prison Journal, 99(4), 484–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885519852090
66.
PfaffJ. (2017). Locked in: The true causes of mass incarceration-and how to achieve real reform. Basic Books.
67.
Reingle GonzalezJ. M.RanaR. E.JetelinaK. K.RobertsM. H. (2019). The value of lived experience with the criminal justice system: A qualitative study of peer re-entry specialists. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63(10), 1861–1875. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19830596
SchlesingerT. (2011). The failure of race neutral policies: How mandatory terms and sentencing enhancements contribute to mass racialized incarceration. Crime and Delinquency, 57(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128708323629
SellsD.CurtisA.Abdur-RaheemJ.KlimczakM.BarberC.MeadenC.HassonJ.FallonP.Emigh-GuyM. (2020). Peer-mentored community reentry reduces recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820901562
75.
SmithD. E. (1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. University of Toronto Press.
76.
SmithD. E. (2002). Texts, facts and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. Routledge.
77.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage.
78.
TigheS. (2014). “Of course we are crazy”: Discrimination of Native American Indians through criminal justice. Justice Policy Journal, 11, 1.
79.
TroshynskiE. I.BejinariuA. (2021a). Exploring the rhetoric: How state gender diversity laws address rights for sex/gender diverse students. Critical Criminology, 29, 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-021-09563-3
TroshynskiE. I.KennedyM. A.SousaW. H.MadensenT. D.WillisC. (2016). Prisoner reentry in Nevada: Final report on the HOPE for Prisoners program (Research in Brief 4). Center for Crime and Justice Policy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. https://hopeforprisoners.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/nv-prisonerreentry.pdf
82.
TroshynskiE. I.WillisC. (2023). “They are usually borderline homeless”: Exploring the nexus of homelessness, housing instability, successful reentry, and long term reintegration. The Journal of Qualitative Criminology and Criminal Justice, 1, 42. https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.0190c3d6
83.
TroshynskiE. I.WillisC. (2024). Coming home during a pandemic: Lessons on community engagement for reentry success. In AzarT. (Ed.), Community engagement and the Covid-19 pandemic. Vernon Press.
VisherC. A.TravisJ. (2011). Life on the outside: Returning home after incarceration. The Prison Journal, 91(3), 102S–119S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885511415228
86.
WalklateS.MythenG. (2011). Beyond risk theory: Experiential knowledge and “knowing otherwise.”Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811398456
WilliamJ. M.SpencerZ.WilsonS. K. (2021). I am not your felon: Decoding the trauma, resilience, and recovering mothering of formerly incarcerated Black women. Crime & Delinquency, 67(8), 1103–1136.
