“They Take it Out on All of Us”: Collective Punishment in Carceral Spaces

Abstract

Legitimacy plays a crucial role in fostering order in prisons. When carceral staff are perceived as just, residents are more likely to follow institutional rules. Achieving procedural legitimacy is complicated by systemic barriers, including the use of collective punishment. Collective punishment is the sanctioning of a group because of the actions of one individual. Collective punishment can compromise rehabilitation and diminish procedural fairness. This study explores perceptions of collective punishment by analyzing data from interviews with residents and staff across eight prisons in four states. Findings reveal that residents and staff recognize collective punishment as pervasive. Residents report strain and injustice, whereas staff express concerns about its unintended consequences. The findings suggest that when punishment is indiscriminate, it undermines authority. By situating these findings within broader discussions on procedural legitimacy across hierarchical institutions, this research highlights the need for policies that prioritize fairness and targeted disciplinary measures over collective punishment.

Keywords

collective punishment prison qualitative methodology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew

(1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x

AirSight. (2018, September 6). Pennsylvania DOC announced new safety protocols and measures for all state prisons. https://www.airsight.com/en/news/pennsylvania-doc-announced-new-safety-protocols-and-measures-for-all-state-prison

Ansems

van den Bos

Mak

(2024). Speaking of justice: A qualitative interview study on perceived procedural justice among defendants in Dutch criminal cases. Law & Society Review, 54(3), 643–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12499

Beijersbergen

Dirkzwager

Molleman

van der Laan

Nieuwbeerta

(2015). Procedural justice in prison: The importance of staff characteristics. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(4), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13512767

Bihu

(2020). Using unstructured interviews in educational and social science research. Global Scientific Journals, 8(10), 712–721. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4435828

Blakinger

(2025, September 2). Four deaths in two weeks: What’s behind the surge in violence at one Texas prison. Houston Chronicle. https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/investigations/article/texas-prison-violence-peaks-drug-crackdown-20809033.php

Blevins

Listwan

Cullen

Jonson

(2010). A general strain theory of prison violence and misconduct: An integrated model of inmate behavior. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(2), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986209359369

Bottoms

Tankebe

(2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 102(1), 119–170. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol102/iss1/4

Brady

(2018, August 30). Prison officials in 3 states investigating illnesses related to smuggled drugs. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2018/08/30/643445810/prison-officials-in-3-states-investigating-illnesses-related-to-smuggled-drugs

10.

Butler

Solomon

DeLisi

(2021). Time served in prison, in-prison experiences, and perceptions of procedural justice. Justice Quarterly, 38(7), 1519–1541. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.1985159

11.

Cen

(2008). Chinese adolescents’ attitudes towards collective and communicable responsibility. Journal of Moral Education, 37(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240802009470

12.

Chapkovski

(2021). Strike one hundred to educate one: Measuring the efficacy of collective sanctions experimentally. PLOS ONE, 16(4), Article e0248599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248599

13.

Charmaz

(2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.

14.

Clemmer

(1940). The prison community. Rinehart.

15.

Corbin

Strauss

(1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. https://link-springer-com-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/article/10.1007/bf00988593

16.

Creswell

Poth

(2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

17.

Crewe

Ievins

(2021). “Tightness,” recognition and penal power. Punishment & Society, 23(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520928115

18.

Darcy

(2010). Prosecuting the war crime of collective punishment: Is it time to amend the Rome statue. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqp083

19.

Durand

(2025). The shadow of the law: Adverserial formalism in prisoner-staff relations. Law & Social Inquiry, 50(2), 349–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2025.8

20.

Fabricant

(2011). War crimes and misdemeanors: Understanding “zero-tolerance” policing as a form of collective punishment and human rights violation. Drexel Law Review, 3(2), 373–414. https://drexel.edu/law/lawreview/issues/Archives/v3-2/fabricant/

21.

Fagan

(2017). Race and the new policing. In Luna

(Ed.), Reforming criminal justice: A report of the Academy for Justice on bridging the gap between scholarship and reform (Vol. 2, pp. 83–116). Academy for Justice. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2058/

22.

Friedman

Farber

(1992). Professional self-concept as a predictor of teacher burnout. Journal of Education Research, 86(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9941824

23.

Gawlik v. Reis, No. 3:23-CV-1194 (D. Conn. 2025).

24.

The Geneva Conventions. (1949, August 12). Convention (IV) relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gciv-1949

25.

Gibson

(1998). Semi-structured and unstructured interviewing: A comparison of methodologies in research with patients following discharge from an acute psychiatric hospital. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 5(6), 469–477. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2850.1998.560469.x

26.

Goffman

(1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. AldineTransaction.

27.

Heckathorn

(1990). Collective sanctions and compliance norms: A formal theory of group-mediated social control. American Sociological Review, 55(3), 366–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095762

28.

Ingel

Carlisle

(2024). Pay to talk: The financial barriers, consequences, and solutions to prison and jail communication. In Budd

Dillaway

Lane

Muschert

Nair

Smith

(Eds.), Agenda for social justice 3 (pp. 19–25). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447371410.ch003

29.

Ingel

Richards-Karamarkovich

Bietsch

Rudes

(2021). Privacy violations and procedural justice in the United States prisons and jails. Sociology Compass, 15(2), Article e12847. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12847

30.

Jackson

Tyler

Bradford

Taylor

Shiner

(2010). Legitimacy and procedural justice in prisons. Prison Service Journal, 191, 4–10. https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/29676

31.

Jashnani

Bustamante

Stoudt

(2021). Legal process as racialized punishment: The material consequences of discretionary arrests in New York City. Critical Criminology, 29(4), 873–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-021-09595-9

32.

Kolber

(2012). Unintentional punishment. Legal Theory, 18(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1352325211000218

33.

Kopp

(2021, August 18). Why I am against collective punishment. Prison Journalism Project. https://prisonjournalismproject.org/2021/08/18/why-i-am-against-collective-punishment/

34.

Kushmerick-McCune

Ingel

Bauer

Rudes

(2024). Hunger, health, and harm: Perceptions of prison food, medical care, and well-being. In Link

Novisky

Fahmy

(Eds.), Handbook on contemporary issues in health, crime, and punishment (pp. 258–273). Routledge.

35.

Liebling

(2008). Incentives and earned privileges revisited: Fairness, discretion, and the quality of prison life. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 9(Suppl. 1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14043850802450773

36.

Liebling

(2011). Moral performance, inhuman and degrading treatment and prison pain. Punishment & Society, 13(5), 530–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474511422159

37.

Liebling

Arnold

(2004). Prisons and their moral performance: A study of values, quality, and prison life. Oxford University Press.

38.

Liu

Visher

O’Connell

(2020). The strain from procedural injustice on parolees: Bridging procedural justice theory and general strain theory. Crime & Delinquency, 66(2), 250–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719839376

39.

Mazerolle

Bennett

Davis

Sargeant

Manning

(2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(3), 245–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9175-2

40.

Mears

Aranda-Hughes

Pesta

(2021). Managing prisons through extended solitary confinement: A necessary approach or a signal of prison system failure? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 68(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211058948

41.

Meissner

Mello

(2022). The unintended consequences of UN sanctions: A qualitative comparative analysis. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(2), 243–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2059226

42.

Morris

Carriaga

Diamond

Piquero

(2012). Does prison strain lead to prison misbehavior? An application of general strain theory to inmate misconduct. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(3), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.12.001

43.

Newman

(1958). Research interviewing in prison. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 49(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/1140922

44.

New York Senate. (2021, March 18). Senate passes the “HALT” solitary confinement act. https://www.nysenate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021/senate-passes-halt-solitary-confinement-act

45.

Palankis

Horwitz

Green

Wisdom

Duan

Hoagwood

(2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Service Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

46.

Reisig

Mesko

(2009). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner misconduct. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802089768

47.

Rozek

(2021, April 7). Let’s end collective punishment in U.S. prisons. National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws. https://www.narsol.org/2021/04/lets-end-collective-punishment-in-u-s-prisons/

48.

Rudes

(2022). Surviving solitary: Living and working in restricted housing units. Stanford University Press.

49.

Rudes

Magnuson

Ingel

Hartwell

(2021). Rights-in-between: Resident perceptions of an accessibility to rights within restricted housing units. Law & Society Review, 55(2), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12550

50.

Rudes

Magnuson

Portillo

Hattery

(2021). Sex logics: Negotiating the prison rape elimination act against its’ administrative, safety, and cultural burdens. Punishment & Society, 23(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520952155

51.

Ryan

Bergin

(2022). Procedural justice and legitimacy in prisons: A review of extant empirical literature. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211053367

52.

Santo

(2015, May 12). Adding pepper spray to the prison arsenal. The Marshall Project. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2015/05/12/adding-pepper-spray-to-the-prison-arsenal

53.

Shaw

Seaward

Pageau

Wangmo

Elger

(2023). Perceptions of collective and other unjust punishment in Swiss prisons: A qualitative exploration. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 19(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-06-2021-0059

54.

Sheuerman

(2013). The relationship between injustice and crime: A general strain theory approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(6), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.06.019

55.

Slater

(2017, July/August). North Dakota’s Norway experiment: Can humane prisons work in America? A red state aims to find out. Mother Jones. https://www.motherjones.com/criminal-justice/2017/07/north-dakota-norway-prisons-experiment/

56.

Steiner

Wooldredge

(2018). Prison officer legitimacy, their exercise of power, and inmate rule breaking. Criminology, 56(4), 750–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12191

57.

Sykes

(1958). The society of captives. Princeton University Press.

58.

Texas Department of Criminal Justice. (2023, October 18). Systemwide lockdown and comprehensive search. https://www.tdcj.texas.gov/news/archive/systemwide_lockdown_and_comprehensive_search.html

59.

Thomas

Kelsey

Vaish

(2024). No one is going to recess: How children evaluate collective and targeted punishment. Social Development, 33(2), Article e12730. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12730

60.

Toch

(1992). Mosaic of despair: Human breakdowns in prison. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10136-000

61.

Tracy

(2019). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.

62.

Tyler

(2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357. https://doi.org/10.1086/652233

63.

Tyler

(2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.

64.

Ugelvik

(2014). Power and resistance in prison: Doing time, doing freedom. Palgrave Macmillan.

65.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (n.d.). The United Nations standard minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules). https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/Nelson_Mandela_Rules-E-ebook.pdf

66.

Unnever

Gabbidon

(2011). A theory of African American offending: Race, racism, and crime. Routledge.

67.

Walters

Bolger

(2019). Procedural justice perceptions, legitimacy beliefs, and compliance with the law. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(3), 341–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9338-2

68.

Worcester Police Department. (2008, May 6). OC aerosol spray guidelines (Policy 400.2). https://public.powerdms.com/WorcesterPolice/documents/1515702

69.

Zweig

Yahner

Visher

Lattimore

(2015). Using general strain theory to explore the effects of prison victimization experiences on later offending and substance use. The Prison Journal, 95(1), 84–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885514563283