Differential Reinforcement in Context: Prior Imprisonment as a Condition for Kin-Based Criminal Influence on Recidivism

Abstract

This study examines the role of differential reinforcement (DR)—a primary mechanism of social learning theory (SLT)—within intimate family and friendship networks and its impact on recidivism. We hypothesize that kin-based DR is more consequential than friends, and that its influence has a more significant impact on men that are more deeply embedded in the correctional system. To test this, we utilized a life history calendar approach administered to a sample of 249 formerly incarcerated men in Ohio, linked with administrative records to track recidivism over a 3-year follow-up period. Cox regression models reveal a potent conditional effect: direct and anticipated reinforcement from kin networks (though not from non-kin peers) more than tripled the hazard of recidivism among individuals with one or more prior incarcerations, providing conditional support for SLT. We suggest that reentry policies should prioritize family-focused interventions to mitigate these deep-seated social influences.

Keywords

recidivism prisoner reentry criminology life course longitudinal

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akers

R. L.

(1985). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Wadsworth Publishing Co.

Akers

R. L.

(1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press.

Akers

R. L.

Krohn

M. D.

Lanza-Kaduce

Radosevich

(1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 636–655. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/389120/

Antenangeli

Durose

M. R.

(2021). Recidivism of prisoners released in 24 states in 2008: A 10-year follow-up period (2008-2018). US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Bachman

R. D.

Paternoster

(2016). Statistics for criminology and criminal justice. Sage.

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bellair

P. E.

Light

Sutton

(2018). Prisoners’ personal networks in the months preceding prison: A descriptive portrayal. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63(3), 383–405. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30207180/

Bellair

P. E.

Sutton

J. R.

(2017). Reliability and validity of prisoner self-reports gathered using the life event calendar method. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(1), 107–130. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3768153/

Berg

M. T.

Huebner

B. M.

(2011). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 382–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2010.498383

10.

Brauer

J. R.

(2009). Testing social learning theory using reinforcement’s residue: A multilevel analysis of self-reported theft and marijuana use in the National Youth Survey. Criminology, 47(3), 929–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00164.x

11.

Brauer

J. R.

Tittle

C. R.

(2012). Social learning theory and human reinforcement. Sociological Spectrum, 32(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2012.646160

12.

Bronson

Berzofsky

(2017). Indicators of mental health problems reported by prisoners and jail inmates, 2011–12. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/imhprpji1112.pdf

13.

Burgess

R. L.

Akers

R. L.

(1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14(2), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/798612

14.

Burt

R. S.

(1984). Network items and the General Social Survey. Social Networks, 6(4), 293–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(84)90007-8

15.

Carson

E. A.

(2020). Prisoners in 2019. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/prisoners-2019

16.

Chen

Cohen

Chen

(2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics–Simulation and Computation, 39(4), 860–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610911003650383

17.

Clemmer

(1940). The prison community. Christopher Publishing House.

18.

Cornwell

Schumm

L. P.

Laumann

E. O.

Graber

(2009). Social networks in the NSHAP study: Rationale, measurement, and preliminary findings. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64B(Suppl. 1), i47–i55. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp042

19.

Council of State Governments Justice Center (CSG). (2018). Justice reinvestment 2.0 in Ohio [Prepared for the Ohio Justice Reinvestment 2.0 Advisory Committee].

20.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

21.

de Cuyper

Dirkzwager

Völker

van der Laan

Nieuwbeerta

(2013). Personal networks of prisoners prior to incarceration: A comparison with the general Dutch population. Social Science Research, 42(6), 1612–1621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.006

22.

Durose

M. R.

Cooper

A. D.

Snyder

H. N.

(2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010 (Vol. 28). US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

23.

Freedman

Thornton

Camburn

Alwin

Young-DeMarco

(1988). The life history calendar: A technique for collecting retrospective data. Sociological Methodology, 18, 37–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/271044

24.

Gendreau

Little

Goggin

(1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology, 34(4), 575–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01220.x

25.

Goffman

(1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Anchor Books.

26.

Gottfredson

M. R.

Hirschi

(1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.

27.

Grambsch

P. M.

Therneau

T. M.

(1994). Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika, 81(3), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/81.3.515

28.

Haney

(2001). The psychological impact of incarceration: Implications for post-prison adjustment. Urban Institute.

29.

Harding

D. J.

Morenoff

J. D.

Nguyen

A. P.

Bushway

S. D.

(2018). Imprisonment and labor market outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 124(1), 49–110. https://doi.org/10.1086/697507

30.

Harman

H. H.

(1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press.

31.

Hirschi

Gottfredson

(1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89(3), 552–584. https://doi.org/10.1086/227905

32.

Hogan

Janulis

Phillips

G. L.

II Melville

Mustanski

Contractor

Birkett

(2020). Assessing the stability of egocentric networks over time using the digital participant-aided sociogram tool Network Canvas. Network Science, 8(2), 204–222. http://doi:10.1017/nws.2019.27

33.

Jolliffe

I. T.

(2002). Principal component analysis (2nd ed.). Springer.

34.

Kolbeck

S. G.

Bellair

P. E.

Lopez

(2022). Race, work history, and the employment recidivism relationship. Criminology, 60(4), 637–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12317

35.

Kolbeck

S. G.

Lopez

Bellair

(2024). Does stable employment after prison reduce recidivism irrespective of prior employment and offending? Justice Quarterly, 41(1), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2023.2201330

36.

Laub

J. H.

Sampson

R. J.

(2006). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Harvard University Press.

37.

Lösel

(2012). Offender treatment and rehabilitation: What works. In Maguire

Morgan

Reiner

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 986–1016). Oxford University Press.

38.

Marsden

P. V.

(1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), 435–463. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/2083277

39.

Maruna

(2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American Psychological Association.

40.

Matsueda

R. L.

Anderson

(1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology, 36(2), 269–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01249.x

41.

Merluzzi

T. V.

Burt

C. H.

(2013). Social networks and health. In Nezu

A. M.

Nezu

C. M.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive and behavioral therapies (pp. 483–502). Oxford University Press.

42.

Mowen

T. J.

Boman

J. H.

(2018). Do we have it all wrong? The protective roles of peers and criminogenic risks from family during prison reentry. Crime & Delinquency, 65(5), 688–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128718800286

43.

Naser

R. L.

Visher

C. A.

(2006). Family members’ experiences with incarceration and reentry. Western Criminology Review, 7(2), 20–31.

44.

Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC). (2021). Recidivism report.

45.

Pager

(2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975. https://doi.org/10.1086/374403

46.

Pratt

T. C.

Cullen

F. T.

Sellers

C. S.

Thomas

K. A.

Madensen

T. D.

(2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 765–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820903379610

47.

Rebellon

C. J.

(2006). Do adolescents engage in delinquency to attract the attention of peers? An extension and longitudinal test of the social reinforcement hypothesis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(4), 387–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427806291259

48.

Rose

D. R.

Clear

T. R.

(1998). Incarceration, social capital, and crime: Implications for social disorganization theory. Criminology, 36(3), 441–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01255.x

49.

Rubin

D. B.

(1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley & Sons.

50.

Sampson

R. J.

(1999). Techniques of research neutralization. Theoretical Criminology, 3(4), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480699003004004

51.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Harvard University Press.

52.

Sampson

R. J.

Wilson

W. J.

(1995). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In Hagan

Peterson

R. D.

(Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 37–54). Stanford University Press.

53.

Schoenfeld

D. R.

(1982). Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika, 69(1), 239–241. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335876

54.

Sutherland

E. H.

(1939). Principles of criminology (3rd ed.). J. B. Lippincott.

55.

Sutherland

E. H.

(1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). J. B. Lippincott.

56.

Sutton

J. E.

Bellair

P. E.

Kowalski

B. R.

Light

Hutcherson

D. T.

(2011). Reliability and validity of prisoner self-reports gathered using the life event calendar method. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9101-y

57.

Visher

C. A.

Travis

(2003). Transitions from prison to community: Understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.095931

58.

Völker

De Cuyper

Mollenhorst

Dirkzwager

van der Laan

Nieuwbeerta

(2016). Changes in the social networks of prisoners: A comparison of their networks before and after imprisonment. Social Networks, 47, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.04.004

59.

Walters

G. D.

(2003). Changes in criminal thinking and identity in newly admitted prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(4), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854803253137

60.

Wheeler

(1961). Socialization in correctional communities. American Sociological Review, 26(5), 697–712. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/2090199

61.

Wojciechowski

(2026). Heterogeneity in the development of differential reinforcement: Examining predictive power of definitions and differential association from a social learning perspective. Applied Developmental Science, 30(2), 203–220.

62.

Young

J. T. N.

Rebellon

C. J.

Barnes

J. C.

Weerman

F. M.

(2014). Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology, 52(1), 60–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12029