This article describes how allegations of child sexual abuse are investigated and adjudicated in Israel. Believing that children may well be harmed by repeated interrogation and demands to testify and be cross-examined, Israeli legislators enacted special provisions several decades ago to ensure that children were spared these traumas. Recent evaluations of the system they established suggest that the protections concerned may have led inadvertently to various practices, including the failure to prosecute, that have not served children well. Possible remedies and a research program related to these issues are described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berliner, L. , & Barbieri, M. K. (1984). The testimony of child victims of sexual assault. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 125-137.
2.
Boychuk, T. D. (1991). Criteria-based content analysis of children's statements about sexual abuse: A field-based validation study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.
3.
Cohen, N. (1993). The youth investigators' reasons for prohibiting or permitting children to testify in court. In M. Hovav (Ed.), Sexual offenses against children: The law, the investigator, and the court (pp. 84-94). Tel Aviv, Israel: Shirikova. (in Hebrew)
4.
Cutshall, J. L. , & Yuille, J. C. (1990). Field studies of eyewitness memory of actual crimes. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods for investigation and evidence (pp. 97-124). New York: Springer.
5.
David, H. (1989). The role of the youth interrogator. In J. R. Spencer, G. Nicholson, R. Flin, & R. Bull (Eds.), Children's evidence in legal proceedings: An international perspective (pp. 97-103). Cambridge, England: Cambridge Law Faculty.
6.
Eden, L. (1984). Sexual offenses against minors. In L. Eden & P. Rudick (Eds.), Moral offenses against children. Jerusalem: Ministry of Labor and Welfare. (in Hebrew)
7.
Eden, L. (1987, November). Investigation and treatment of children involved in moral offenses. Paper presented at the Regional Congress of the World Association of Social Psychiatry, Budapest, Hungary.
8.
Eigelstein, S. (1991). A survey of youth investigators. Jerusalem: Ministry of Labor and Welfare. (in Hebrew)
9.
Eigelstein, S. (1993). A survey of youth investigators: Second and third time. Jerusalem: Ministry of Labor and Welfare. (in Hebrew)
10.
Goodman, G. S. , Taub, E. P., Jones, D. P. H., England, P., Port, L. K., Rudy, L., & Prado, L. (1992). Testifying in criminal court. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57 (5, Serial No. 229).
11.
Harnon, E. (1988). Examination of children in sexual offenses: The Israeli law and practice. Criminal Law Review, pp. 263-274.
12.
Harnon, E. (1989). Children's evidence in the Israeli criminal justice system with special emphasis on sexual offenses. In J. R. Spencer, G. Nicholson, R. Flin, & R. Bull (Eds.), Children's evidence in legal proceedings: An international perspective (pp. 81-96). Cambridge, England: Cambridge Law Faculty.
13.
Hochman, I. , & Karniel, I. (1994). Investigations with children: Victims, witnesses, and suspects involved in sexual offenses and physical offenses by their parents (Annual Report, 1993). Jerusalem: Ministry of Labor and Welfare. (in Hebrew)
14.
Horowitz, D. , & Hovav, M. (1993). The youth investigator in the eyes of the court. In M. Hovav (Ed.), Sexual abuse of children: The law, the investigator, and the court (pp. 133-256). Tel Aviv, Israel: Shirikova. (in Hebrew)
15.
Hovav, M. (Ed.). (1993). Sexual abuse of children: The law, the investigator, and the court. Tel Aviv, Israel: Shirikova. (in Hebrew)
16.
Jones, D. P. H. , & McQuiston, M. G. (1988). Interviewing the sexually abused child. London: Gaskell.
17.
Kadman, I. (1993). The law and its punishment: The correction to the law of evidence and its application: A critical view. In M. Hovav (Ed.), Sexual offenses against children: The law, the investigator, and the court (pp. 95-108). Tel Aviv, Israel: Shirikova. (in Hebrew)
18.
Karniel, I. (1993). The work of the youth investigator: Professional, ethical, and personal conflicts. In M. Hovav (Ed.), Sexual offenses against children: The law, the investigator, and the court (pp. 73-83). Tel Aviv, Israel: Shirikova. (in Hebrew)
19.
Lamb, M. E. , Hershkowitz, I., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., Hovav, M., Manor, T., & Yudilevitch, L. (in press). Effects of investigative utterance types on Israeli children's responses. International Journal of Behavioral Development.
20.
Lamb, M. E. , Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (1994). Factors influencing the reliability and validity of statements made by young victims of sexual maltreatment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 255-280.
21.
Lamb, M. E. , Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (1995). Making children into competent witnesses: Reactions to the amicus brief In re Michaels. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1, 438-449.
22.
Lamers-Winkelman, F. , & Buffing, F. (1996). Children's testimony in the Netherlands: A study of statement validity analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 304-321.
23.
Libai, D. (1969). The protection of the child victim of a sexual offense in the criminal justice system. Wayne State Law Review, 15, 977-1032.
24.
Melamed, A. (1987). Report by the Committee on Sexual Offenses Against Minors. Jerusalem: Committee on Sexual Offenses Against Minors. (in Hebrew)
25.
Melamed, A. (1993). The role of the youth investigator as perceived by legislators, judges, and the public. In M. Hovav (Ed.), Sexual abuse of childrenL: The law, the investigator, and the court (pp. 28-59). Tel-Aviv, Isreal: Shirikova. (in Hebrew)
26.
Nizan, Y. (1988). Children as witnesses in child sex crimes: Revisiting the issues. Law, 18, 297-336.
27.
Raskin, D. C. , & Esplin, P. W. (1991). Statement validity assessment: Interview procedures and content analysis of children's statements of sexual abuse. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 265-291.
28.
Raskin, D. C. , & Esplin, P. W. (1992). Assessments of children's statements of sexual abuse. In. J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections: Implications for eyewitness testimony (pp. 153-164). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29.
Raskin, D. , & Yuille, J. C. (1989). Problems of evaluating interviews of children in sexual abuse cases. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 184-207). New York: Springer-Verlag.
30.
Reifen, D. (1973). The juvenile court in a changing society: Young offenders in Israel. Jerusalem: Keter.
31.
Runyon, D. R. , Everson, M. D., Edelsohn, C. A., Hunter, W. M., & Coulter, M. L. (1988). Impact of legal intervention on sexually abused children. Journal of Pediatrics, 113, 647-653.
32.
Saywitz, K. J. , Geiselman, R. E., & Bornstein, G. K. (1992). Effects of cognitive interviewing and practice on children's recall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 744-756.
33.
Steller, M. , & Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria-based statement analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217-245). New York: Springer.
34.
Sternberg, K. J. , Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Yudilevitch, L., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., & Hovav, M. (1995). Effects of rapport-building style on children's abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse. Manuscript in preparation.
35.
Tedesco, J. F. , & Schnell, S. V. (1987). Children's responses to sex abuse investigation and litigation. Child Abuse & Neglect, 11, 267-272.
36.
Undeutsch, U. (1982). Statement reality analysis. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 27-56). Stockholm: Norstedt.
37.
Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In A. Trankel (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 27-56). Stockholm: Novsteat.
38.
Yuille, J. C. , & Cutshall, J. L. (1986). A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 291-301.
39.
Yuille, J. C. , & Cutshall, J. L. (1989). Analysis of the statements of victims, witnesses, and suspects. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 175-191). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
