Both law and psychiatry continue to be the privileged and pivotal divide by and through which decisions are made regarding mentally ill defendants. The present article conceptually explores the overlapping effects of medicolegal decision making. Under consideration is the guilty-but-mentally-ill (GBMI) verdict and how knowledge is both constructed and articulated in the forensic courtroom context. Utilization of a Lacanian postmodern framework demonstrates how discourse, desire, and subjectivity are important themes in the sense-making process. The article concludes by speculating on how such organizing principles in law and psychiatry, as manifested in the GBMI verdict, function as a form of violence in language or punishment through speech.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, F. , Abraham, R., & Shaw, C. (1990). A visual introduction to dynamical systems theory for psychology. Santa Cruz, CA: Aerial Press.
2.
Arrigo, B. (1993a). An experientially-informed feminist jurisprudence: Rape and the move toward praxis. Humanity and Society, 17, 28-47.
3.
Arrigo, B. (1993b). Madness, language, and the law. Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston.
4.
Arrigo, B. (1994). Legal discourse and the disordered criminal defendant: Contributions from psychoanalytic semiotics and chaos theory. Legal Studies Forum, 18, 93-112.
5.
Arrigo, B. (1995a). The contours of psychiatric justice: A postmodern critique of mental illness, criminal insanity, and the law. New York: Garland.
6.
Arrigo, B. (1995b).[De]construction classroom instruction: Theoretical and methodological contributions of the postmodern sciences for crimino-legal instruction. Social Pathology, 1, 3-42.
7.
Arrigo, B. (1995c). Subjectivity in law, medicine, and science: A semiotic perspective on punishment. In C. Sistare (Ed.), Punishment: Social control and coercion (pp. 21-45). New York: P. Lang.
8.
Arrigo, B. (1996). Desire in the psychiatric courtroom: On Lacan and the dialectics of linguistic oppression. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 16, 159-187.
9.
Bracher, M. (1988). Lacan's theory in the four discourses. Prose Studies, 11, 32-49.
10.
Butz, M. (1992). Chaos: An omen of transcendence in the psychotherapeutic process. Psychological Reports, 71, 827-843.
11.
Callahan, L. , Mayer, C., & Steadman, H. J. (1987). Insanity defense reform in the United States—post Hinckley. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 11, 54-59.
12.
Cornell, D. (1991). Beyond accommodation: Ethical feminism, deconstruction and the law. New York: Routledge.
13.
Cornell, D. (1993). Transformations: Recollective imagination and sexual difference. New York: Routledge.
14.
Deleuze, G. , & Guattari, F. (1977). Capitalism and schizophrenia: The anti-Oedipus (R. Hurley, M. Seem, & P. R. Lane, Trans.) New York: Viking.
15.
Deleuze, G. , & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
Dews, P. (1987). Logics of disintegration: Post-structural thought and the claims of critical theory. New York: Verso.
17.
Foucault, M. (1965). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
18.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of a prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
19.
Gergen, K. (1991). The saturated self. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Oxford, UK: Polity.
21.
Giddens, A. (1990). Consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Gilligan, C. , Lyons, N. P., & Hanmer, T. J. (1990). Making connections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Guattari, F. (1984). Molecular revolution: Psychiatry and politics. (R. Sheed, Trans.). New York: Penguin.
25.
Henry, S. , & Milovanovic, D. (1991). Constitutive criminology: The maturation of critical theory. Criminology, 29, 293-315.
26.
Keilitz, I. (1987). Researching and reforming the insanity defense. Rutgers Law Review, 39, 289-322.
27.
Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits: A selection (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Norton.
28.
Lacan, J. (1985). Feminine sexuality (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Norton.
29.
Lacan, J. (1991). L'envers de la psychanalyse [The opening of psychoanalysis]. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
30.
Laclau, E. (1989). Preface. In S. Zieck, The sublime object of ideology (pp. ix-xv). New York: Verso.
31.
Lee, J. S. (1990). Jacques Lacan. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
32.
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
33.
MacCabe, C. (1979). James Joyce and the revolution of the world. London: MacMillan.
34.
MacGraw, B. D. , Farthing-Capowich, D., & Keilitz, I. (1985). The guilty but mentally ill plea and verdict: Current state of the knowledge. Villanova Law Review, 169, 205-221.
35.
Manning, P. (1988). Symbolic communication: Signifying calls and the police response. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Mayer, C. (1987, June). Insanity defense reforms: Pre- and post-Hinckley. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Law and Society Association, Washington, DC.
37.
Melville, S. (1987). Psychoanalysis and the place of jouissance. Critical Inquiry, 13, 349-370.
38.
Milovanovic, D. (1988). Jailhouse lawyers and jailhouse lawyering. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 16, 455-475.
39.
Milovanovic, D. (1992). Postmodern law and disorder: Psychoanalytic semiotics and juridic exegesis. Liverpool, UK: Deborah Charles.
40.
Milovanovic, D. (1993). Lacan, chaos, and practical discourse in law. In R. Kevelson (Ed.), Flux, complexity, illusion in law (pp. 311-337). New York: P. Lang.
41.
Milovanovic, D. (1995). Postmodern law and subjectivity: Lacan and the linguistic turn. In D. Caudill & S. Gold (Eds.), Radical philosophy of law: Contemporary challenges to mainstream legal theory and practice (pp. 38-53). Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press.
42.
Petrella, R. C. , Benedek, E. P., Bank, S. C., & Packer, I. K. (1985). Examining the application of the guilty but mentally ill verdict in Michigan. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 36, 254-259.
43.
Pfohl, S. J. (1984). Predicting dangerousness: A social deconstruction. In L. Teplin (Ed.), Mental health and criminal justice (pp. 201-226). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
Ragland-Sullivan, E. (1986). Jacques Lacan and the philosophy of psychoanalysis. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
45.
Richer, P. (1992). An introduction to deconstructionist psychology. In S. Kavale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 102-113). London: Sage.
46.
Salecl, R. (1988). Homage to the great one. Prose Studies, 11, 84-93.
47.
Sarup, M. (1989). Post-structuralism and postmodernism. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
48.
Schwartz, M. , & Freidrichs, D. (1994). Postmodern thought and criminological discontent: New metaphors for understanding violence. Criminology, 32, 221-246.
49.
Silverman, K. (1988). The acoustic mirror: The female voice in psychoanalysis and cinema. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
50.
Simon, R. J. , & Aaronson, D. E. (1988). The insanity defense: A critical assessment of law and policy in the post-Hinckley era. New York: Praeger.
51.
Singer, R. G. (1985). The aftermath of an insanity acquittal: The Supreme Court's recent decision in Jones v. United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1, 114-124.
52.
Smith, G. A. , & Hall, J. A. (1982). Evaluating Michigan's guilty but mentally ill verdict: An empirical study. Journal of Law Reform, 16, 75-112.
53.
Steadman, H. J. , McGreevy, M., Morrissey, J., Callahan, L., Clark, T., Robbins, P., & Cirincione, C. (1993). Before and after Hinckley: Evaluating insanity defense reform. New York: Guilford.
54.
Wolinsky, S. H. (1991). Trances people live with: Healing approaches to quantum psychology. Norfolk, CT: Bramble.
55.
Wolinsky, S. H. (1993). Quantum consciousness: The guide to experiencing quantum psychology. Norfolk, CT: Bramble.
