Legal Pressure and Treatment Retention in a National Sample of Long-Term Residential Programs

Abstract

This study examined the association between legal pressure and treatment retention in a national sample of 2,605 clients admitted to 18 long-term residential facilities that participated in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Hierarchical linear models were used to assess the relationship of background factors and legal pressure with treatment participation for 90 days or longer. Two thirds of the sample entered residential treatment with moderate to high pressure from legal authorities, and they were significantly more likely than the low-pressure clients to stay 90 days or more. Moreover, the difference in retention between moderate-to-high-and low-pressure clients was even greater in programs with proportionally larger caseloads under legal surveillance. The criminal justice system (CJS) can influence treatment participation and retention, and it appears essential for the CJS and treatment programs to maintain an open and constructive relationship to maximize their potential combined impact.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anglin, M. D. (1988). The efficacy of civil commitment in treating narcotic addiction. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice (pp. 8-34). (NIDA Research Monograph 86, DHHS Publication No. ADM 88-1578). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Anglin, M. D. , Brecht, M. L. , & Maddahian, E. (1989). Pretreatment characteristics and treatment performance of legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance admissions. Criminology, 27, 537-557.

Anglin, M. D. , & Hser, Y. (1990). Legal coercion and drug abuse treatment: Research findings and social policy implications. In J. A. Inciardi & J. R. Biden, Jr. (Eds.), Handbook of drug control in the United States (pp. 151-176). New York: Greenwood.

Anglin, M. D. , Longshore, D. , Turner, S. , McBride, D. , Inciardi, J. , & Prendergast, M. (1996). Study of the functioning and effectiveness of treatment alternatives to street crime (TASC) programs: Final report. Los Angeles: UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center.

Anglin, M. D. , & McGlothlin, W. H. (1984). Outcome of narcotic addict treatment in California. In F. M. Tims & J. P. Ludford (Eds.), Drug abuse treatment evaluation: Strategies, progress, and prospects (pp. 106-128). (NIDA Research Monograph 51, DHHS Publication No. ADM 84-1329). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Anglin, M. D. , & Powers, K. I. (1991). Methadone treatment and legal supervision: Individual and joint effects on the behavior of narcotics addicts. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 515-531.

Aron, W. S. , & Daily, D. W. (1976). Graduates and splitees from therapeutic community drug treatment programs: A comparison. International Journal of the Addictions, 11, 1-18.

Belenko, S. , Sufian, M. , & Young, D. (1997, November). Predictors of treatment outcomes for felony drug offenders: Individual risk factors and legal pressure. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Diego, CA.

Blood, L. , & Cornwall, A. (1994). Pretreatment variables that predict completion of an adolescent substance abuse treatment program. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 182, 14-19.

10.

Brecht, M. L. , Anglin, M. D. , & Wang, J. C. (1993). Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance clients. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 19, 89-106.

11.

Broome, K. M. , Flynn, P. M. , & Simpson, D. D. (in press). Psychiatric comorbidity and retention in drug abuse treatment. Health Services Research.

12.

Broome, K. M. , Knight, K. , Hiller, M. L. , & Simpson, D. D. (1996). Drug treatment process indicators for probationers and prediction of recidivism. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 13, 487-491.

13.

Broome, K. M. , Knight, D. K. , Knight, K. , Hiller, M. L. , & Simpson, D. D. (1997). Peer, family, and motivational influences on drug treatment process and recidivism for probationers. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 387-397.

14.

Brown, B. (1996). The state of drug abuse treatment. (NIDA Resource Paper).

15.

Bryk, A. , & Raudenbush, S. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

16.

Bryk, A. , Raudenbush, S. , & Congdon, R. (1996). Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

17.

Cole, S. G. , & James, L. R. (1975). A revised treatment typology based on the DARP. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 2, 37-49.

18.

Collins, J. J. , & Allison, M. (1983). Legal coercion and retention in drug abuse treatment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 34, 1145-1149.

19.

Condelli, W. S. (1994). Domains of variables for understanding and improving retention in therapeutic communities. International Journal of the Addictions, 29, 593-607.

20.

Condelli, W. S. , & De Leon, G. (1993). Fixed and dynamic predictors of client retention in therapeutic communities. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 10, 11-16.

21.

Condelli, W. S. , & Dunteman, G. H. (1993). Issues to consider when predicting retention in therapeutic communities. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 25, 239-244.

22.

Craddock, S. G. , Rounds-Bryant, J. L. , Flynn, P. M. , & Hubbard, R. L. (1997). Characteristics and pretreatment behaviors of clients entering drug abuse treatment: 1969 to 1993. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 23, 43-59.

23.

De Leon, G. (1984). The therapeutic community: Study of effectiveness (NIDA Research Monograph Series, DHHS Publication No. ADM 84-1286). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

24.

De Leon, G. (1985). The therapeutic community: Status and evolution. International Journal of the Addictions, 20, 823-844.

25.

De Leon, G. (1988a). Legal pressure in therapeutic communities. Journal of Drug Issues, 18, 625-640.

26.

De Leon, G. (1988b). Legal pressure in therapeutic communities. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice (NIDA Research Monograph 86, DHHS Publication No. ADM.88-1578, 160-177). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

27.

De Leon, G. (1991). Retention in drug-free therapeutic communities. In R. W. Pickens , C. G. Leukefeld , & C. R. Schuster (Eds.), Improving drug abuse treatment (NIDA Research Monograph 106, DHHS Publication No. ADM 91-1754, pp. 218-244). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

28.

De Leon, G. , & Schwartz, S. (1984). Therapeutic communities: What are the retention rates. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 10, 267-284.

29.

Flynn, P. M. , Craddock, S. G. , Hubbard, R. L. , Anderson, J. , & Etheridge, R. M. (1997). Methodological overview and research design for the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 230-243.

30.

Gerstein, D. R. , & Harwood, H. J. (Eds.). (1990). Treating drug problems: Vol. 1. A study of the evolution, effectiveness, and financing of public and private drug treatment systems (Committee for the Substance Abuse Coverage Study Division of Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

31.

Hiller, M. L. , Knight, K. , Broome, K. M. , & Simpson, D. D. (1996). Compulsory community-based substance abuse treatment and the mentally ill criminal offender. The Prison Journal, 76, 180-191.

32.

Hiller, M. L. , Knight, K. , & Simpson, D. D. (1996). An assessment of comorbid psychological problems in a residential criminal justice drug treatment program. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 10, 181-189.

33.

Hubbard, R. L. , Collins, J. J. , Rachal, J. V. , & Cavanaugh, E. R. (1988). The criminal justice client in drug abuse treatment. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice (NIDA Research Monograph 86, DHHS Publication No. ADM 88-1578, pp. 57-79). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

34.

Hubbard, R. L. , Marsden, M. E. , Rachal, J. V. , Harwood, H. J. , Cavanaugh, E. R. , & Ginzburg, H. M. (1989). Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

35.

Joe, G. W. , & Simpson, D. D. (1976). Treatment retention for drug users: 1972-1973 DARP admissions. In S. B. Sells & D. D. Simpson (Eds.), The effectiveness of treatments for drug abuse (Vol. 5, Part II, pp. 167-228). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.

36.

Leukefeld, C. G. (1991). Opportunities for enhancing drug abuse treatment with criminal justice authority. In R. W. Pickens , C. G. Leukefeld , & C. R. Schuster (Eds.), Improving drug abuse treatment (NIDA Research Monograph 106, DHHS Publication No. ADM 91-1754, pp. 328-337). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

37.

Leukefeld, C. G. , & Tims, F. M. (1988). Compulsory treatment: A review of findings. In C. G. Leukefeld , & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice (NIDA Research Monograph 86, DHHS Publication No. ADM 88-1578, pp. 236-251). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

38.

Leukefeld, C. G. , & Tims, F. M. (1993). Drug abuse treatment in prisons and jails. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 10, 77-84.

39.

Lewis, B. F. , & Ross, R. (1994). Retention in therapeutic communities: Challenges for the nineties. In F. M. Tims , G. De Leon , & N. Jainchill (Eds.), Therapeutic communities: Advances in research and application (NIDA Research Monograph 144, DHHS Publication No. 94-3633, pp. 99-116). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

40.

Lipton, D. S. (1995). The effectiveness of treatment for drug abusers under criminal justice supervision (National Institute of Justice: Research Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

41.

McFarlain, R. A. , Cohen, G. H. , Yoder, J. , & Guidry, L. (1977). Psychological test variables associated with retention of narcotic addicts in treatment. International Journal of the Addictions, 12, 399-410.

42.

McGlothlin, W. H. , Anglin, M. D. , & Wilson, B. P. (1977). A follow-up of admissions to the California Civil Addict Program. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 4, 179-199.

43.

Nurco, D. N. , Hanlon, T. E. , Bateman, R. W. , & Kinlock, T. W. (1995). Drug abuse treatment in the context of correctional surveillance. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 12, 19-27.

44.

Platt, J. (1995). Heroin addiction theory, research, treatment: Vol. 2. The addict, the treatment process, and social control. Malabar, FL: Krieger.

45.

Pompi, K. F. , & Resnick, J. (1987). Retention in court-referred adolescents and young adults in the therapeutic community. International Journal of the Addictions, 13, 309-325.

46.

Prendergast, M. L. , Anglin, M. D. , & Wellisch, J. (1995). Treatment for drug-abusing offenders under community supervision. Federal Probation, 59, 66-75.

47.

Sansone, J. (1980). Retention patterns in a therapeutic community for the treatment of drug abuse. International Journal of the Addictions, 15, 711-736.

48.

Shwartz, M. , Mulvey, K. P. , Woods, D. , Brannigan, P. , & Plough, A. (1997). Length of stay as an outcome in an era of managed care: An empirical example. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 14, 11-18.

49.

Siddall, J. W. , & Conway, G. L. (1988). Interactional variables associated with retention and success in residential drug treatment. International Journal of the Addictions, 23, 1241-1254.

50.

Simpson, D. D. (1979). The relation of time spent in drug abuse treatment to posttreatment outcome. American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 1449-1453.

51.

Simpson, D. D. (1981). Treatment for drug abuse: Follow-up outcomes and length of time spent. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 875-880.

52.

Simpson, D. D., & Curry, S. J. (Eds.). (1997). Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS) [Special Issue]. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11.

53.

Simpson, D. D. , & Friend, H. J. (1988). Legal status and long-term outcomes for addicts in the DARP follow-up project. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice (NIDA Research Monograph 86, DHHS Publication No. ADM 88-1578, pp. 81-98). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

54.

Simpson, D. D. , Joe, G. W. , Broome, K. M. , Hiller, M. L. , Knight, K. , & Rowan-Szal, G. A. (1997). Program diversity and treatment retention rates in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 279-293.

55.

Simpson, D. D. , Joe, G. W. , & Brown, B. S. (1997). Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 294-307.

56.

Simpson, D. D. , Joe, G. W. , & Rowan-Szal, G. A. (1997). Drug abuse treatment retention and process effects on follow-up outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 47, 227-235.

57.

Simpson, D. D. , & Sells, S. B. (1982). Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: An overview of the DARP research program. Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse, 2, 7-29.

58.

Simpson, D. D. , & Sells, S. B. (Eds.). (1990). Opioid addiction and treatment: A 12-year follow-up. Malabar, FL: Krieger.

59.

Sirotnik, K. A. , & Roffe, M. W. (1977). An investigation of the feasibility of predicting outcome indices in the treatment of heroin addiction. International Journal of the Addictions, 12, 755-775.

60.

Stark, M. J. (1992). Dropping out of substance abuse treatment: A clinically oriented review. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 93-116.

61.

Torres, S. (1997). An effective supervision strategy for substance-abusing offenders. Federal Probation, 61, 38-44.

62.

Vickers-Lahti, M. , Garfield, F. , McCusker, J. , Hindin, R. , Bigelow, C. , Love, C. , & Lewis, B. (1995). The relationship between legal factors and attrition from a residential drug abuse treatment program. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 27, 17-25.

63.

Wexler, H. K. , & De Leon, G. (1977). The therapeutic community: Multivariate prediction of retention. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 4, 145-151.